Table 2

Detailed list of 13 types of working condition samples.

Case ID Degradation type (dominant) Simulation method Sample count
Normal Normal condition No degradation applied 50
F1 Jamming Friction coefficient increased to 0.15 50
F2 Lubrication failure Damping coefficient increased by 40% 50
F3 Link rod deformation 0.8 mm initial bending displacement applied 50
F4 Jamming + lubrication failure (jamming) Combined F1 and F2 50
F5 Jamming + Link deformation (jamming) Combined F1 and F3 50
F6 Lubrication failure + link deformation (lubrication) Combined F2 and F3 50
F7 Triple composite (jamming) Combined F1, F2, and F3 50
F8 Jamming + lubrication failure (lubrication) Combined F1 and F2, with lubrication effect dominant 50
F9 Jamming + link deformation (link) Combined F1 and F3, with link deformation dominant 50
F10 Lubrication failure + link deformation (Link) Combined F2 and F3, with link deformation dominant 50
F11 Triple composite (lubrication) Combined F1, F2, and F3, with lubrication dominant 50
F12 Triple composite (link) Combined F1, F2, and F3, with link deformation dominant 50
Total 650

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.