Table 6

Details of the composite fault decoupling success rate and recall rate of each degradation type.

Composite fault case Fault Method Decoupling success rate (%) Jamming recall (%) Lubrication recall (%) Link rod recall (%)
F4: J+L (J) Proposed 94.7 96.2 93.5
SVM Fusion 68.1 72 65
ResNet 52.4 60 55
F5: J+Link (J) Proposed 92.1 95 90.5
SVM Fusion 65.3 70 62
ResNet 50.8 58 53
F6: L+Link (L) Proposed 91.8 94 89.2
SVM Fusion 67.5 71 64
ResNet 51.2 56 54
F7: Triple (J) Proposed 89.3 91 88.5 87
SVM Fusion 63 68 66 61
ResNet 48.5 55 52 50
F8: J+L (L) Proposed 93.9 94.5 95.2
SVM Fusion 66.8 69 68
ResNet 51.6 57 56
F9: J+Link (Link) Proposed 90.5 92 93
SVM Fusion 64.2 67 65
ResNet 49.7 56 52
F10: (Link) L+Link Proposed 89.7 90 92.5
SVM Fusion 65.9 67 66
ResNet 50.1 54 55

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.