A hybridised CSAGA method for damage detection in structural elements

Open Access

Table 1

Comparison of the results from CSAGA and FEA.

Sl. No.	FEA result							CSAGA result				Percentage of error				Total error

	rfnf	rsnf	rtnf	rcd₁	rcl₁	rcd₂	rcl₂	rcd₁	rcl₁	rcd₂	rcl₂	rcd₁	rcl₁	rcd₂	rcl₂
1	0.99893	0.9989	0.9984	0.125	0.1375	0.4375	0.1625	0.12228	0.1344	0.4273	0.159	2.17	2.25	2.31	2.11	2.21
2	0.99737	0.9973	0.99685	0.15625	0.225	0.53125	0.2625	0.15276	0.2173	0.5196	0.25633	2.23	2.3	2.18	2.35	2.265
3	0.99722	0.9970	0.9991	0.21875	0.1875	0.46875	0.225	0.21347	0.18335	0.4569	0.2198	2.41	2.21	2.51	2.28	2.3525
4	0.99612	0.9959	0.9956	0.1875	0.2375	0.5	0.2875	0.18307	0.2316	0.488	0.2804	2.36	2.47	2.39	2.46	2.42
5	0.9975	0.9921	0.9973	0.25	0.2	0.5625	0.3375	0.2444	0.19494	0.5497	0.3289	2.24	2.53	2.27	2.53	2.3925

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.