Table 6
Performance comparison under special bridge deck structure conditions.
| Bridge deck type | Experimental group MAE (%) | Control group MAE (%) | Experimental group wind speed error (%) | Control group wind speed error (%) | Experimental group prediction time (s) | Control group prediction time (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Irregular Curved Box Girder | 3.58 | 5.12 | 3.98 | 6.24 | 19.2 | 26.7 |
| Multi-Chamber Twin-Web Closed Box | 3.06 | 4.47 | 3.12 | 5.85 | 18.5 | 24.9 |
| Tapered Section with Reinforced Ribs | 3.44 | 5.08 | 4.22 | 6.91 | 20.1 | 27.3 |
| Convex-Concave Composite Deck | 3.31 | 4.85 | 3.41 | 6.05 | 19 | 25.8 |
| Wavy-Edged Open Box Girder | 3.15 | 4.66 | 3.18 | 5.79 | 18.9 | 24.4 |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.