EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 6 / No 4 (Juillet-Août 2005) Mécanique & Industries, 6 4 (2005) 431-437 References
Open Access
Issue
Mécanique & Industries
Volume 6, Number 4, Juillet-Août 2005
3es Assises Machines et Usinage Grande Vitesse
Page(s) 431 - 437
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/meca:2005051
Published online 28 September 2005
  1. A. Dugas, M. Terrier, J.Y. Hascoët, Free Form Surface Measurement Method and Machine Qualification for High Speed Milling, Int. Conf. on Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering, Clermont-Ferrand, France, 14–16 May, 2002, CD Rom [Google Scholar]
  2. J.P. Merlet, Les robots parallèles, Édition Hermès, 1990 [Google Scholar]
  3. J.P. Merlet, An initiative for the kinematics study of parallel manipulators, Workshop on Fundamental Issues and Future Research Directions for Parallel Mechanisms and Manipulators, Quebec City, Canada, 3, 4 October, 2002, pp. 2–9 [Google Scholar]
  4. I. Bonev, Delta Parallel Robot – the story of success, ParalleMIC, 2001, http://www.parallemic.org/ Reviews/Review002.html (Accès décembre 2003) [Google Scholar]
  5. F. Xi, D. Zhang, Z. Xu, C.M. Mechefske, A comparative study on tripod units for machine tools, Int. J. Machine Tools and Manufacture 43 (2003), 721–730 [Google Scholar]
  6. S.A. Joshi, L.W. Tsai, The kinematics of a class of 3-DOF 4-Legged parallel manipulators, ASME 2002 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computer and Information in Engineering Conference, Montreal, Canada, 29 September–2 October, 2002, pp. 1–10 [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Herrero, M. Zatarain, X. Almandoz, Development of a five-drive parallel kinematics machine, II. International Seminar on Improving Machine Tool Performance, La Baule, France, 3–5 July, 2000, CD Rom (ref. B16) [Google Scholar]
  8. http://www.smttricept.com (Accès décembre 2003) [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Weck, D. Staimer, Parallel Kinematic Machine Tools – Current State and Future Potentials, Annals of the CIRP, 51/2 (2002) 1–13 [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Geldart, P. Webb, H. Larsson, M. Backstrom, N. Gindy, K. Rask, A direct comparison of the machining performance of a variax 5 axis parallel kinetic machining centre with conventional 3 and 5 axis machine tools, Int. J. Machine Tools and Manufacture, in press [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Dugas, CFAO et UGV. Simulation d'usinage de formes complexes, Thèse de Doctorat, École centrale de Nantes, Université de Nantes, France, 13 décembre 2002 [Google Scholar]
  12. J.Y. Hascoet, A. Dugas, J.J. Lee, Rapport Final – Tâche III – Simulation des opérations d'usinage, Rapport final du projet "Saut technologique UGV", Institut de Recherche en Communications et Cybernétique de Nantes (IRCCyN), France, juin 2001, 161 p. [Google Scholar]
  13. Laboratoire Universitaire de Recherche en Production Automatisée, École normale supérieure de Cachan, 61 avenue du Président Wilson, 94235 Cachan Cedex, France, tél: +(33)1 47 40 22 15, fax: +(33)1 47 40 22 20 [Google Scholar]
  14. E. Duc, C. Lartigue, S. Laporte, Assessment of the description format of tool trajectories in 3-axis HSM, Third International Conference on Metal cutting and High Speed Machining, Metz, France, June 2001, pp. CANC6 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.