Open Access
Issue
Mécanique & Industries
Volume 7, Number 3, Mai-Juin 2006
Page(s) 277 - 286
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/meca:2006041
Published online 17 November 2006
  1. P. Maurice, Les plans d'expériences par la méthode de Taguchi, ISBN 2-7081-2031-X, 1997 [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Unal, Response surface model building and multidisciplinary optimization using D-Optimal Design, Engineering Management Department, Old Dominion University Norfolk, VA23529-1998 [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Coutin, Les aciers à haute limite d'élasticité à dispersoîdes, propriétés de formage, Cetim Informations, 74, février 1982, ISSN 0399-0001, pp. 60–68 [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Mkaddem, R. Bahloul, A. Potiron, H.S.L.A. steel sheet metal characterisation for metal forming processes by using experimental approaches, The 7th International ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming 2004, Apr. 28–30, Trondheim, Norway [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Mkaddem, Expérimentation et simulation du pliage de tôles H.L.E. Prévision du comportement en service des pièces pliées, Thèse de doctorat, ENSAM Angers, 16 décembre 2003 [Google Scholar]
  6. J.L. Chaboche, Continuous damage mechanics-A tool to describe phenomena before crack initiation, Nucl. Engrg. Des. 64 (1981) 233–247 [Google Scholar]
  7. R. Hambli, Finite element simulation of fine blanking processes using a pressure- dependant damage model, J. Materials Processing Technology 116 (2001) 252–264 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Lemaitre, A continuous damage mechanics model for ductile fracture, J. Engineering Materials and Technology 107 (1985) 83–89 [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Lemaitre, J.L. Chaboche, Mécanique des matériaux solides, Dunod Paris, ISBN2-04-018618-2, 1988, pp. 343–444 [Google Scholar]
  10. M.A. Criesfield, Non linear finite element analysis of solids and structures, 1, Wiley, 1991 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hibbit, Karlsson and Sorensen, Inc, ABAQUS Theory Manual, USA, 2001, version 6.2 [Google Scholar]
  12. L. Guillaumat, Aide au pré-dimensionnement de structures composites impactées, Mec. Ind. 1 (2000) 235–240 [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Benoist, Notions sur les plans d'expériences, Technip, 1974 [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Alexis, Pratique industrielle de la méthode de Taguchi, Afnor 1995 [Google Scholar]
  15. S.G. Gilmour, R. Mead, A Bayesian design criterion for locating the optimum point on response surface, Statics & Probability Letters 64 (2003) 235–242 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. H. Martins Gomesa, A. Miguel Awruchb, Comparison of response surface and neural network with other methods for structural reliability analysis, Structural Safety 26 (2004) 49–67 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Wolfram, Le logiciel Mathematica, version 4.2 [Google Scholar]
  18. The Optimization Toolbox with MATLAB. MA: The Mathworks, Inc.; June 18, 2002, version 6.2 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.