Open Access
Issue
Mécanique & Industries
Volume 8, Number 6, Novembre-Décembre 2007
Page(s) 515 - 527
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/meca:2007075
Published online 06 February 2008
  1. J.M. Ko, Y.Q. Ni, Technology developments in structural health monitoring of large-scale bridges, Eng. Structures 27 (2005) 1715–1725 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. V. Lekidis, M. Tsakiri, K. Makra, C. Karakostas, N. Klimis, I. Sous, Evaluation of dynamic response and local soil effects of the Evripos cable-stayed bridge using multi-sensor monitoring systems, Eng. Geology 79 (2005) 43–59 [Google Scholar]
  3. W.X. Ren, X.L. Peng, Y.Q. Lin, Experimental and analytical studies on dynamic characteristics of a large span cable-stayed bridge, Eng. Structures 27 (2005) 535–548 [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Meo, G. Zumpano, On the optimal sensor placement techniques for a bridge structure, Eng. Structures 27 (2005) 1488–1497 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. T.H. Yan, R.M. Lin, General optimization of sizes or placement for various sensors/actuators in structure testing and control, Smart Materials and Structures 15 (2006) 724–736 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Inaudi, State of the art in fiber optic sensing technology and EU structural health monitoring projects, in Proc. of the First International Conference on Structural Health Monitoring and Intelligent Infrastructure, Tokyo, Japan, 2003 [Google Scholar]
  7. Y. Zhao, F. Ansari, Quasi-distributed fiber-optic strain sensor: principle and experiment, Appl. Opt. 40 (2001) 3176–3181 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. SMARTEC (http://www.smartec.ch), SOFO Products (Standard Deformation Sensor, SMARTape Deformation Sensor and Dynamic Reading Unit) [Google Scholar]
  9. FOGALE (http://www.fogale.fr), Product: LISE SYSTEM, OCT-EXTEND. [Google Scholar]
  10. FOX-TEK (http://www.fox-tek.com) [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Inaudi, S. Vurpillot, Monitoring of Concrete Bridges with Long-Gage Fiber Optic Sensors, J. Intell. Mtals. Sys. Struct. 10 (1999) 280–292 [Google Scholar]
  12. D. Inaudi, B. Glisic, Combining Static and Dynamic deformation monitoring with long-gauge fiber optic sensors, in Proceedings of the International Association for Bridge Maintenance and Safety, Kyoto, Japan, 2004 [Google Scholar]
  13. E. Reynders, G. De Roeck, Measurement of modal curvature using optical fiber strain sensors and application to damage identification using vibration monitoring, in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Optical Fiber Sensors, 2005, pp 1076–1079 [Google Scholar]
  14. B. Glisic, D. Inaudi, Sensing tape for easy integration of optical fiber sensors in composite structures, in Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Optical Fiber Sensors, Nara, Japan, 2003 [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Courteville, M. Delaveau, S. Delepine-Lesoille, E. Merliot, L. Quetel, New concept of low intrusion quasi-distributed optical fibre extensometer, in Proceedings of Photonics Europe, 2006 [Google Scholar]
  16. F. Casciati, M. Domaneschi, D. Inaudi, A. Figini, B. Glisic, A. Gupta, Long-gauge fiber optic sensors: a new approach to dynamic system identification, in Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Structural Control, 2004 [Google Scholar]
  17. F. Bourquin, Towards Modal Fiber Optical Sensors for Slender Beams, in Proceedings of the 2nd European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Munich, Germany, 2004, pp. 1193–1198 [Google Scholar]
  18. J.M. Lopez-Higuera, Handbook of Optical Fibre Sensing Technology, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2002 [Google Scholar]
  19. F. Ansari, Y. Libo, Mechanics of Bond and Interface Shear Transfer in Optical Fiber Sensors, J. Eng. Mech. 124 (1998) 385–394 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. J.P. Perez, Optique: fondements et applications avec 250 exercices et problèmes résolus, Dunod, Paris, 2004 [Google Scholar]
  21. J.S. Sirkis, H.W. Haslach, Interferometric Strain Measurement by Arbitrarily Configured, Surface-Mounted, Optical Fibers, J. Lightwave Technology 10 (1990) 1497–1503 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. T.G. Giallorenzi, J.A. Bucaro, A. Dandrige, G.H. Sigel, J.H. Cole, S.C. Rashleigh, R.G. Priest, Optical Fiber Sensor Technology, J. Quantum Electronics 4 (1982) 626–665 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Deltheil, Cours de mathématiques générales: II- Éléments de calcul intégral : Applications géométriques de l'analyse, Baillière, 1947 [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Géradin, D. Rixen, Théorie des vibrations: Application à la dynamique des structures, Masson, 1996 [Google Scholar]
  25. H. Park, H.S. Jung, Y.H. Kwon, J.H. Seo, Mathematical models for assessment of the safety of steel beams based on average strains from long gage optic sensors, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 125 (2006) 109–113 [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Delepine-Lesoille, E. Merliot, C. Boulay, L. Quétel, M. Delaveau, A. Courteville, Quasi-distributed optical fibre extensometers for continuous embedding into concrete: design and realization, Smart Materials and Structures 15 (2006) 931–938 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Y. Zhao, F. Ansari, Quasi-distributed white light fiber optic strain sensor, Optics communication 196 (2001) 133–137 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. S. Delepine-Lesoille, M. Quiertant, E. Merliot, Y. Gautier, J. Dumoulin, S. Dubroca, L. Quétel, M. Delaveau, A. Courteville, Quasi-distributed optical fibre extensometers for continuous embedding into concrete: Design, Realization, Laboratory and Field Tests, in Proceedings of the Third European Workshop on Structural Health monitoring, Grenade, Spain, 2006, pp. 946–953 [Google Scholar]
  29. T.M. Nguyen, Dynamique non linéaire des systèmes mécaniques couplés : Réduction de modèle et Identification, Thèse, ENPC-MODES, 2006 [Google Scholar]
  30. T.P. Le, P. Argoul, Continuous wavelet transform for modal identification using free decay response, J. Sound Vib. 277 (2004) 73–100 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.