Open Access
Issue
Mechanics & Industry
Volume 19, Number 2, 2018
Article Number 211
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/meca/2018010
Published online 25 September 2018
  1. W.M. Thomas, E.D. Nicholas, J.C. Needham, M.G. Murch, P. Templesmith, C.J. Dawes, International Patent Application PCT/GB92/02203 and GB Patent Application No.9125978.8, 1991, UK Patent Office, London [Google Scholar]
  2. R.S. Mishra, M.W. Mahoney, Friction stir processing, in: R.S. Mishra, M.W. Mahoney (Eds.), Friction Stir Welding and Processing, ASM International, 2007, pp. 309–350 [Google Scholar]
  3. N.Z. Khan, A.N. Siddiquee, Z.A. Khan, S.K. Shihab, Investigations on tunneling and kissing bond defects in FSW joints for dissimilar aluminum alloys, J. Alloy. Compd. 648 (2015) 360–367 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A.N. Siddiquee, S. Pandey, N.Z. Khan, Friction stir welding of austenitic stainless steel: a study on microstructure and effect of parameters on tensile strength, Mater. Today Proc. 2 (2015) 1388–1397 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Heydarian, K.N. Dehghani, T. Slamkish, Optimizing powder distribution in production of surface nano-composite via friction stir processing, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 45B (2014) 821–826 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Hashemi, G. Hussain, Wear performance of Al/TiN dispersion strengthened surface composite produced through friction stir process: a comparison of tool geometries and number of passes, Wear 324 (2015) 45–54 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. E.R.I. Mahmoud, M. Takahashi, T. Shibayanagi, K. Ikeuchi, Effect of friction stir processing tool probe on fabrication of SiC particle reinforced composite on aluminium surface, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 14 (2009) 413–425 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Dolatkhah, P. Golbabaei, M.K.B. Givi, F. Molaiekiya, Effects of process parameters on microstructural and mechanical properties of Al5052/SiC metal matrix composite fabricated via friction stir processing, Mater. Des. 37 (2012) 458–464 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. T.G. Santos, N. Lopes, M. Machado, P. Vilaca, R.M. Miranda, Surface reinforcement of AA5083-H111 by friction stir processing assisted by electrical current, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 216 (2015) 375–380 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. K. Elangovan, V. Balasubramanian, Influences of pin profile and rotational speed of the tool on the formation of friction stir processing zone in AA2219 aluminium alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 459 (2007) 7–18 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. K. Elangovan, V. Balasubramanian, Influences of tool pin profile and tool shoulder diameter on the formation of friction stir processing zone in AA6061 aluminium alloy, Mater. Des. 29 (2008) 362–373 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Dixit, J.W. Newkirt, R.S. Mishra, Properties of friction stir-processed Al 1100–NiTi composite, Scr. Mater. 56 (2007) 541–544 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Rai, A. De, H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia, T. DebRoy, Review: friction stir welding tools, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 16 (2011) 325–342 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. P.A. Colegrove, H.R. Shercliff, Two-dimensional CFD modelling of flow round profiled FSW tooling, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 9 (2004) 483–492 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. K. Kumar, S.V. Kailas, The role of friction stir welding tool on material flow and weld formation, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 485 (2008) 367–374 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. J.A. Schneider, A.C. Nunes Jr, Characterization of plastic flow and resulting microstructures in a friction stir weld, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 35 B (2004) 777–783 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S.M. Chowdhury, D.L. Chen, S.D. Bhole, X. Cao, Effect of pin tool thread orientation on fatigue strength of friction stir welded AZ31B-H24 Mg butt joints, Procedia Eng. 2 (2010) 825–833 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. T.U. Seidel, A.P. Reynolds, Two-dimensional friction stir welding process model based on fluid mechanics, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 8 (2003) 175–183 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.