Open Access
Mechanics & Industry
Volume 24, 2023
Article Number 11
Number of page(s) 9
Published online 17 April 2023
  1. J.P. Moehle, Seismic analysis, design, and review for tall buildings, Struct. Des. Tall Spe Build. 15, 495–513 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. D.W. Ko, H.S. Lee, Shaking table tests on a high-rise RC building model having torsional eccentricity in soft lower storeys, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 35, 1425–1451 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. H.S. Lee, D.W. Ko, Seismic response characteristics of high-rise RC wall buildings having different irregularities in lower stories, Eng. Struct. 29, 3149–3167 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A.M. Riyaz, C.A. Taylor, An experimental investigation into earthquake-induced failure of medium to low height concrete gravity dams, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 24, 373–393 (1995) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Tinawi, P. Leger, M. Leclerc, G. Cipolla, Seismic safety of gravity dams: from shake table experiments to numerical analysis, J. Struct. Eng. 126, 518–529 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. D.G. Zou, B. Xu, X.J. Kong, Study of influence of different methods for calculating Rayleigh damping coefficient on high earth-rock dam seismic response, Rock Soil Mech. 32, 797–803 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  7. M.A. Hosam-Eddin, A.M. Abdel-Ghaffar, Seismic energy dissipation for cable-stayed bridges using passive devices, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 23, 877–893 (1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. K.R. Karim, F. Yamazaki, Effect of earthquake ground motions on fragility curves of highway bridge piers based on numerical simulation, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 30, 1839–1856 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. B.B. Chen, Z.R. Feng, H.M. You, Seismic response analysis of long-span cable-stayed bridge with nonlinear viscous dampers under different periodic seismic waves, Civ. Eng. J. 27, 114–131 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  10. L.D. Jacobs, D.R. Reginald, T.L. Roberto, Seismic behavior of a Jumbo container crane including uplift, Earthq. Spectra 27, 745–773 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. T. Kanayama, A. Kashiwazaki, Study on the dynamic behavior of container cranes under strong earthquakes. ASME PVP, Seismic Eng. 364, 276–284 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Yamamoto, T. Sugano, T. Tanabe, The shaking table test of the interaction between the pier type wharf and the container crane during earthquakes. Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng. 68, 3209–3216 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. T. Eto, Model experiment on dynamic interaction of a container crane and a pier in a large-scale earthquake, Kuren. 37, 20660–20665 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  14. M.L. Lou, X.G. Shao, Coefficient selection of damping matrix in explicit calculation of soil layer seismic response, J. Tongji. Univ. 41, 1126–1132 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  15. Z.Q. Song, C.H. Su, Computation of rayleigh damping coefficients for the seismic analysis of a hydro-powerhouse, Shock Vib. 2046345 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  16. A.K. Chopra, R.K. Goel, A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31, 561–582 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Z.G. Xu, X.L. Du, C.S. Xu, C.Y. Zang, J.W. Jiang, Comparison of determination methods of site Rayleigh damping coefficients in seismic responses analysis of underground structures, Rock Soil Mech. 40, 4838–4847 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  18. N. Yoshida, S. Kobayashi, I. Suetomi, Equivalent linear method considering frequency dependent characteristics of stiffness and damping, Soil Dyn. Earthq Eng. 22, 205–222 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Z. Li, C. Xu, S.Y. Wu, Calculating the Rayleigh damping coefficient under seismic dynamic simulation of a quayside container crane, Aust. J. Mech. Eng. 1–10 (2019) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.