Open Access
Issue
Mechanics & Industry
Volume 25, 2024
Article Number 4
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/meca/2024003
Published online 14 February 2024
  1. A. Thompson, D. McNally, I. Maskery, R.K. Leach, X-ray computed tomography and additive manufacturing in medicine: A review, Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 8, (2017) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Surya Teja, M. Lokesh, S. Deepak Kumar, P.S.V. Ramana Rao, 3D Printing of complex structures: case study of Eiffel Tower, Mater. Today Proc. 76, 640–646 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  3. T. Siripongpreda, V.P. Hoven, B. Narupai, N. Rodthongku, Emerging 3D printing based on polymers and nanomaterial additives: enhancement of properties and potential applications, Eur. Polym. J. 184, 111806 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. K. Kandananond, Surface roughness prediction of FFF-fabricated workpieces by artificial neural network and Box-Behnken method, Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 12, (2021) [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Lieneke, V. Denzer, G.A.O. Adam, D. Zimmer, Dimensional tolerances for additive manufacturing: experimental investigation for fused deposition modeling, Procedia CIRP. 43, 286–291 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. N.K. Maurya, V. Rastogi, P. Singh, Investigation of dimensional accuracy and international tolerance grades of 3D printed polycarbonate parts, Mater. Today Proc. 25, 537–543 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Minetola, F. Calignano, M. Galati, Comparing geometric tolerance capabilities of additive manufacturing systems for polymers, Addit. Manuf. 32, 1–10 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  8. L.M. Galantucci, I. Bodi, J. Kacani, F. Lavecchia, Analysis of dimensional performance for a 3D open-source printer based on fused deposition modeling technique, Procedia CIRP. 28, 82–87 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Maurya, B. Malik, P. Sharma, A. Singh, R. Chalisgaonkar, Investigation of different parameters of cube printed using PLA by FDM 3D printer, Mater. Today Proc. 61, 1217–1222 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  10. V.B. Nidagundi, R. Keshavamurthy, C.P.S. Prakash, Studies on parametric optimization for fused deposition modelling process, Mater. Today Proc. 2, 1691–1699 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. C.W. Wu, W.L. Pearn, S. Kotz, An overview of theory and practice on process capability indices for quality assurance, Int. J. Prod. Econ. 117, 338–359 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. M.Z. Anis, M. Tahir, On some subtle misconceptions about process capability indices, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 87, 3019–3029 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Mahshid, Z. Mansourvar, H.N. Hansen, Tolerance analysis in manufacturing using process capability ratio with measurement uncertainty, Precis. Eng. 52, 201–210 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. E.E. Günay, A. Velineni, K. Park, G.E. Okudan Kremer, An Investigation on Process Capability Analysis for Fused Filament Fabrication, Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 21, 759–774 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  15. N. Ranjan, Materials today: proceedings process capability analysis for fabrication of high elongated PVC polymer using extrusion process selection of thermoplastic polymer (PVC) average feedstock filament has been calculated for reducing of measurement error sel, J. Mater. Today: Proc. 48, 1731–1734 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Y. Wooluru, D.R. Swamy, P. Nagesh, The process capability analysis - a tool for process performance measures and metrics - a case study, Int. J. Qual. Res. 8, 399–416 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Aclan, R. Oezden, S. Danho, Investigation of the geometric change of plastic articles made by polyamide, in: MATEC Web Conf., EDP Sciences, 2018 [Google Scholar]
  18. I. Clavería, D. Elduque, J. Santolaria, C. Pina, C. Javierre, A. Fernandez, The influence of environmental conditions on the dimensional stability of components injected with PA6 and PA66, Polym. Test. 50, 15–25 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Markforged, X7 Gen2, (2021) 1. https://s3.amazonaws.com/mf.product.doc.images/Datasheets/F-PR-3012.pdf.(accessed October 16, 2021) [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Vlaicu, L.I. Repanovici, Acta technica napocensis, Acta Tech. Napocensis. 64, 207–210 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  21. D.R. Hetrick, S.H.R. Sanei, C.E. Bakis, O. Ashour, Evaluating the effect of variable fiber content on mechanical properties of additively manufactured continuous carbon fiber composites, J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 40, 365–377 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. D. Nikiema, P. Balland, A. Sergent, Study of the mechanical properties of 3D-printed onyx parts: investigation on printing parameters and effect of humidity, Chinese J. Mech. Eng. Addit. Manuf. Front. 2, 100075 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Singh Rathor, A. Sharma, Y.K. Modi, PROCESS Capability Analysis of Fused Deposition Modeling Process, Int. j. adv. eng. technol. 11, 147–154 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  24. ELLISTAT, (n.d.). https://ellistat.com/. (accessed March 18, 2023) [Google Scholar]
  25. S. Khodaygan, M.R. Movahhedy, Functional process capability analysis in mechanical systems, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 73, 899–912 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. J. Rajashekharaiah, Six sigma benchmarking of process capability analysis and mapping of process parameters, J. Oper. Supply Chain Manag. 9, 60 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  27. DIN EN ISO 286-1:2010, Geometrical product specifications (GPS) — ISO code system for tolerances on linear sizes — Part 1: Basis of tolerances, deviations and fits, Iso. 2010 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  28. P.R. Gradl, D.C. Tinker, J. Ivester, S.W. Skinner, T. Teasley, J.L. Bili, Geometric feature reproducibility for laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) additive manufacturing with Inconel 718, Addit. Manuf. 47, (2021) [Google Scholar]
  29. S. Maurya, B. Malik, P. Sharma, A. Singh, R. Chalisgaonkar, Investigation of different parameters of cube printed using PLA by FDM 3D printer, Mater. Today Proc. 64, 1217–1222 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. S.M. Mora, J.C. Gil, A.M.C. López, Influence of manufacturing parameters in the dimensional characteristics of ABS parts obtained by FDM using reverse engineering techniques, Procedia Manuf. 41, 968–975 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. D.H. Stamatis, Quality System Requirements, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203734742-3. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.