Mechanics & Industry
Volume 25, 2024
Advanced Approaches in Manufacturing Engineering and Technologies Design
Article Number 19
Number of page(s) 9
Published online 17 June 2024
  1. Patent US 8831914B2 - Pseudo-physical modeling of draw bead in stamping simulations [Google Scholar]
  2. Patent US 5572896A - Strain path control in forming processes [Google Scholar]
  3. Patent US 6832501B2 - Method for Producing Components using a Flowable Active Medium and a Forming Tool [Google Scholar]
  4. K. Siegert, CNC hydraulic multipoint blank-holder system for sheet metal forming presses, Ann. CIRP 42, 319–322 (1993) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Thirvarudchelvan, W. Lewis, The redrawing of cups at redraw ratio of 3 using an annular urethane pad, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 87, 128–130 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  6. M.A. Hassan, N. Takakura, K. Yamaguchi, Friction aided deep drawing using newly developed blank-holder divided into eight segments, Int. J. Machine Tools Manuf. 43, 637–646 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Breunig, F. Hoppe, P. Groche, Blank holder pressure control in cup drawing through tilting of the Ram, NUMIFORM 2019, The 13th International Conference on Numerical Methods in Industrial Forming Processes, June 23–27, Portsmouth, New Hampshire, USA [Google Scholar]
  8. V. Paunoiu, V.G. Teodor, N. Baroiu, G.A. Morosanu, Deep drawing die with kinetic control, UGAL Invent 2021 Exhibition and Conferences, Galati, Romania [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Valjavec, D.E. Hardt, Closed-loop shape control of the stretch forming process over a reconfigurable tool: precision airframe skin fabrication, in: Proceedings of the ASME symposium on advances in metal forming, Nashville, November 1999 [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Naceur, B.H.S. Hedi, Ability of the flexible hydroforming using segmented tool, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 89, 1431–1442 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  11. V. Paunoiu, N. Baroiu, C. Maier, A. Epureanu, V. Marinescu, Reconfigurable deep drawing equipment, Patent number RO 128719–A2, 2011 [Google Scholar]
  12. V. Paunoiu, D. Boazu, Hydro-multipoint Forming, a Challenge in Sheet Metal Forming, Springer International Publishing AG 2017, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-56430-2_7 [Google Scholar]
  13. V. Paunoiu, V. Teodor, N. Baroiu, G.-A. Morosanu, A. Epureanu, Contribution to a new method for deep drawing with kinetic control, NEWTECH 2022, 8–10 September 2022, Rennes, France, MATEC Web of Conf., A. Gavrus, G. Germain V. Paunoiu Eds., Published online: 31 October 2022 [Google Scholar]
  14. D.E. Hardt, N.A. Norfleet, V.M. Valentin, A. Parris, In-process control of strain in a stretch forming process, Trans. ASME 123, 496–503 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Gavrus, M. Banu, E. Ragneau, C. Maier, An inverse analysis of the erichsen test applied for automatic identification of sheet metal behavior, Engineering 2, 471–474 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. F. Barlat, D.J. Lege, J.C. Brem, A six-component yield function for anisotropic materials, Int. J. Plast. 7, 693–712 (1991) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.