EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 27 (2026) Mechanics & Industry, 27 (2026) 14 References
Issue
Mechanics & Industry
Volume 27, 2026
Robotic Process Automation for Smarter Devices in Manufacturing
Article Number 14
Number of page(s) 14
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/meca/2026009
Published online 03 April 2026
  1. O. Boubaker, The inverted pendulum benchmark in nonlinear control theory: a survey, Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 10, 1–10 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  2. K. Kaheman, U. Fasel, J.J. Bramburger, B. Strom, J.N. Kutz, S.L. Brunton, The experimental multi-arm pendulum on a cart: a benchmark system for chaos, learning, and control, HardwareX 15, 465 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  3. B. Bekkar, K. Ferkous, Design of online fuzzy tuning LQR controller applied to rotary single inverted pendulum: Experimental validation, Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 48, 6957–6972 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Mishra, A. Arora, A Huber reward function-driven deep reinforcement learning solution for cart-pole balancing problem, Neural Comput. Appl. 35, 16705–16722 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  5. F. Peker, I. Kaya, E. Cokmez, S. Atic, Cascade control approach for a cart inverted pendulum system using controller synthesis method, in: Proceedings of the 26th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation 2018, pp. 1–6 [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Mahapatra, S. Chauhan, B. Hemakumar, Servo control and stabilization of linear inverted pendulum on a cart using LQG, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Power, Energy, Environment and Intelligent Control, 2018, pp. 783–788 [Google Scholar]
  7. S.K. Mishra, D. Chandra, Stabilization and tracking control of inverted pendulum using fractional order PID controllers, J. Eng. 2014, 1–9 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Ramakrishnan, D.S. Nachimuthu, Design of state feedback LQR based dual mode fractional-order PID controller using inertia weighted PSO algorithm for control of an underactuated system, J. Inst. Eng. (India) Ser. C 102, 1–12 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  9. K.M. Goher, S.O. Fadlallah, Control of a two-wheeled machine with two-directions handling mechanism using PID and PD-FLC algorithms, Int. J. Autom. Comput. 16, 511–533 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  10. V. Bassi, S.K. Mishra, E.E. Omizegba, Automatic tuning of proportional–integral–derivative (PID) controller using particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Appl. 2, 25–34 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  11. K. Isik, G.C. Thomas, L. Sentis, A fixed structure gain selection strategy for high impedance series elastic actuator behavior, J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 141, 021009 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Banerjee, A. Pal, Stabilization of inverted pendulum on cart based on LQG optimal control, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Development, 2018, pp. 1–6 [Google Scholar]
  13. A.D. Kuo, An optimal control model for analyzing human postural balance, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 42, 87–101 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  14. C.A. Monje, Y.Q. Chen, B.M. Vinagre, D. Xue, V. Feliu, Fractional-order Systems and Controls. Fundamentals and Applications, Springer, London, 2010 [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Magdy, A. El Marhomy, M.A. Attia, Modeling of inverted pendulum system with gravitational search algorithm optimized controller, Ain Shams Eng. J. 10, 129–149 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  16. E.Y. Bejarbaneh, M. Masoumnezhad, D.J. Armaghani, B.T. Pham, Design of robust control based on linear matrix inequality and a novel hybrid PSO search technique for autonomous underwater vehicle, Appl. Ocean Res. 101, 102231 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  17. D.H. Al-Janan, H.C. Chang, Y.P. Chen, T.K. Liu, Optimizing the double inverted pendulum’s performance via the uniform neuro multiobjective genetic algorithm, Int. J. Autom. Comput. 14, 641–654 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  18. Z. Sun, N. Wang, Y. Bi, Type-1/type-2 fuzzy logic systems optimization with RNA genetic algorithm for double inverted pendulum, Appl. Math. Model. 39, 569–584 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  19. A.S. Al-Araji, An adaptive swing-up sliding mode controller design for a real inverted pendulum system based on Culture-Bees algorithm, Eur. J. Control 45, 1–9 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  20. S.J. Chacko, R.J. Abraham, On LQR controller design for an inverted pendulum stabilization, Int. J. Dyn. Control 11, 1584–1592 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  21. F.M. Escalante, A.L. Jutinico, M.H. Terra, A.A.G. Siqueira, Robust linear quadratic regulator applied to an inverted pendulum, Asian J. Control 25, 2564–2576 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  22. L. Wang, H. Ni, W. Zhou, P.M. Pardalos, J. Fang, M. Fei, MBPOA-based LQR controller and its application to the double-parallel inverted pendulum system, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 36, 376–386 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  23. P. Dwivedi, S. Pandey, A.S. Junghare, Stabilization of unstable equilibrium point of rotary inverted pendulum using fractional controller, J. Franklin Inst. 354, 7754–7773 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  24. Z. Ben Hazem, M.J. Fotuhi, Z. Bingül, Development of a fuzzy-LQR and fuzzy-LQG stability control for a double link rotary inverted pendulum, J. Franklin Inst. 357, 10529–10556 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  25. C. Lei, R. Li, Q. Zhu, Design and stability analysis of semi-implicit cascaded proportional-derivative controller for underactuated cart-pole inverted pendulum system, Robotica 42, 87–117 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  26. R. Mondal, J. Dey, A novel design methodology on cascaded fractional order (FO) PI-PD control and its real time implementation to cart-inverted pendulum system, ISA Trans. 130, 469–480 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  27. N. Verma, S.K. Valluru, ANN based ANFIS controller design using hybrid meta-heuristic tuning approach for cart inverted pendulum system, Multimed. Tools Appl. 1–23 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  28. N. Verma, S.K. Valluru, Comparative study of parametric disturbances effect on cart-inverted pendulum system stabilization, Lect. Notes Electr. Eng. 948, 1–10 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  29. S.K. Valluru, M. Singh, M. Singh, V. Khattar, Experimental validation of PID and LQR control techniques for stabilization of cart inverted pendulum system, in: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Recent Trends in Electronics, Information and Communication Technology (RTEICT), Bangalore, India, 2018, pp. 708–712. [Google Scholar]
  30. S.M. Schlanbusch, J. Zhou, Adaptive backstepping control of a 2-DOF helicopter system with uniform quantized inputs, in: Proceedings of the IECON–Industrial Electronics Conference, 2020, 1–6 [Google Scholar]
  31. T. Pangaribuan, M.N. Nasruddin, E. Marlianto, M. Sigiro, The influences of load mass changing on inverted pendulum stability based on simulation study, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 237, 012005 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  32. S.K. Valluru, M. Singh, Performance investigations of APSO tuned linear and nonlinear PID controllers for a nonlinear dynamical system, J. Electr. Syst. Inf. Technol. 5, 653–663 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  33. R. Mondal, J. Dey, Performance analysis and implementation of fractional order 2-DOF control on cart-inverted pendulum system, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 56, 7055–7066 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  34. A.K. Patra, S.S. Biswal, P.K. Rout, Backstepping linear quadratic Gaussian controller design for balancing an inverted pendulum, IETE J. Res. 68, 88–100 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  35. L. Abualigah, A. Diabat, A comprehensive survey of the Grasshopper optimization algorithm: Results, variants, and applications, Neural Comput. Appl. 32, 15529–15557 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  36. N. Verma, S.K. Valluru, Comparative analysis of GOA, WCA and PSO tuned fractional order-PID controller for cart-inverted pendulum, in: Proceedings of the IEEE International Power and Renewable Energy Conference, Kollam, India, 2022, pp. 1–6 [Google Scholar]
  37. A.H. Saleh, S.A. Al-khafaji, Anti-swing rejection based on PID controller optimized by firefly algorithm, Math. Model. Eng. Probl. 10, 178–184 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  38. I. Jarraya, L. Degaa, N. Rizoug, M.H. Chabchoub, H. Trabelsi, Comparison study between hybrid Nelder–Mead particle swarm optimization and open circuit voltage–recursive least square for the battery parameters estimation, J. Energy Storage 50, 104424 (2022) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.