EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 18 / No 7 (2017) Supplement Mechanics & Industry, 18 7 (2017) 703 Full HTML
Issue
Mechanics & Industry
Volume 18, Number 7, 2017
STANKIN: Innovative manufacturing methods, measurements and materials
Article Number 703
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/meca/2017050
Published online 30 December 2017

© AFM, EDP Sciences 2017

1 Introduction

Liquid quenching media such as water and oil are featured by the maximum heat transfer coefficient among the whole variety of quenching media. Nevertheless, these media have some disadvantages. In particular, it is difficult to control their cooling ability and, moreover, cooling in a liquid medium is always non-uniform [1–2].

Polymer quenchants provide a possibility to vary the heat transfer coefficient while changing the polymer concentration in the water. Like any liquid, polymer medium is characterized by a non-uniform cooling of the parts being quenched [3–5].

Usage of cooling gaseous high-pressure media enables to easily control their cooling ability by changing the quenching gas pressure. Moreover, such media ensure the maximum cooling uniformity due to the quick and uniform gas flow around the parts being quenched. Such media have an important advantage; they allow not performing the washing of finished parts after the quenching [6–8].

The necessity of experimental determination of quenching medium heat transfer coefficient is caused by the problems of quenching and hardening capacity of parts with certain geometrical dimension as well as by the possibility to apply mathematical modeling to predict quenching results. Experimental evaluation of heat removal intensity is also important for modeling of other processes, such as the controlled cooling of casts to form the required structure [9].

2 Materials and methods

There are methods to determine the heat transfer coefficient [10–11] by measuring the temperature directly at the probe surface and some distance from it. This temperature gradient is proportional to the heat flow from the probe surface during the cooling and the heat transfer coefficient of the surrounding medium; therefore the probes of such design are called gradient probes.

While gradient probe cools, heat flux comes from massive heated probe body and distributes across the thin plate placed on the probe body surface (Fig. 1) [12]. Quenchant takes the heat away from the plate surface. Thermocouple 2 measures temperature at the plate center, thermocouples 1 and 3 measure temperature at its edges. Heat transfer coefficient is calculated according to the formula: (1)

The probe body (Fig. 1a) and the thermosensitive element (Fig. 1b) are manufactured of X12CrNiTi18-9 steel (0,12% C, 18% Cr, 10% Ni, up to 1% Ti), and the plate at the probe surface is made of nickel. Hot junctions for K-type thermocouples are welded to the plate.

The paper [13] presents the method to determine the quenchant cooling ability with the help of a prismatic probe. It has been discovered that average surface temperature (tS) and average mass temperature (tM) isotherms are situated inside while cooling a square prism, a cube, and a short cylinder. Their position in the cross-section of a long square prism is shown in Figure 2a. Coordinates of points S and M are situated at the place of intersections of the isotherms and the diagonal of the prism, and the position of these points changes only at the early stage of cooling. At the main stage of the cooling position of points S and M stabilizes, and their relative coordinates are XS/x = 0.84 and XM/x = 0.57. The advantage of this method is that it is not necessary to place the thermocouple on the surface to measure the probe surface temperature. Heat transfer coefficient α during the quenching cooling is calculated according to the formula: (2)

According to [13], the probe was 200 mm long with the prism side A = 40 mm. Thermocouples were placed along the prism axis and the diagonal distance of 0.84x and 0.57x from it (x is the length of half the diagonal of the prism) in points S and M. The paper [14] substantiates the reduction of probe size and demonstrates that cooling the side surfaces of the probe does not influence the cooling of lateral faces with the ratio of prism side to its length 1:3. Two probes were manufactured. Dimensions of the first one: prism side А = 20 mm, prism height B = 60 mm, depth of openings for thermocouples C = 30 mm, XS = 11.8 mm, XM = 8.1 mm. Dimensions of the second probe: А = 30 mm, B = 72 mm, C = 36 mm, XS = 17.6 mm, XM = 12.1 mm (Fig. 2b). The probe bodies were manufactured of X12CrNiTi18-9 steel, and N-type cable thermocouples were placed in the openings with the diameter of 1.5 mm.

Gradient and prismatic probes were tested in liquid quenching media: water, TNK Thermo Oil quenching oil, and the polymer quenchant (15% solution of Kamgidrol-ZAK [15]). This quenchant consists of polyalkylene oxide, water, anticorrosive, antifoaming and bactericide additives. Kamgidrol-ZAK belongs to the group of polymer media with inverse solubility and ensures a more uniform cooling of the parts' surface [16–17]. The probes were heated in the electric pit furnace up to 850 °C, kept until the warm-up across the whole section (gradient was for 100 min, prismatic with the 30 mm side was for 60 min). Then they were cooled in a quenching medium tank, the cooling curves were registered via the computer and an analog-to-digital converter.

To compare the properties of liquid and gaseous quenching media, the cooling ability of high-pressure nitrogen was studied. Gradient and prismatic probes of two-dimension types were heated in the vacuum furnace 10.0VPT-4020/24N manufactured by SECO/WARWICK up to 1100 °C, kept for 100 min (gradient), 60 min (prismatic with the side of 30 mm) and 40 min (prismatic with the side of 20 mm). Then they were cooled in the nitrogen flow at the pressure of 0.2 to 0.73 MPa, with the cooling curves registered.

thumbnail Fig. 1

Gradient probe body (a) and thermosensitive element (b)
thumbnail Fig. 2

Temperature measuring diagram (a) and prismatic probe body (b)

3 Results and discussion

Figure 3 shows temperature dependences of the heat transfer coefficients of the media mentioned above. These coefficients were calculated based on cooling curves of the probes applying formulas (1) and (2). Heat transfer coefficients of water for various sensors differ significantly, because of the instability of cooling properties of this medium. Heat transfer coefficients of oil and Kamgidrol-ZAK differ insignificantly (maximum difference makes 17%).

Figure 4 shows temperature dependences of the heat transfer coefficients calculated according to the cooling curves of the three probes. The maximum difference of heat transfer coefficients at the same gas pressure does not exceed 20%.

Analysis of dependences demonstrated in Figures 3 and 4  shows that the maximum heat transfer coefficient of high-pressure nitrogen is several times lower than the heat transfer coefficient of quenching oil.

To estimate the adequacy of the results obtained, the process of quenching cooling of steel cylinders was simulated in ANSYS. The first cylinder was made of 100Cr6 steel (1% C, 1.5% Cr) with the diameter of 20 mm and the height of 60 mm was quenched in Kamgidrol-ZAK polymer medium. The second cylinder was made of 20CrNi4 steel (0.2% C, 1% Cr, 4% Ni) with the diameter of 52 mm and the height of 64 mm were quenched in nitrogen at the pressure of 0.73 MPa. They were produced to perform the comparison with the calculated data. Two thermocouples were placed inside the cylinders in the geometric center and near the lateral surface. Cooling curves were registered during quenching.

Temperature dependences of heat-transfer coefficient of Kamgidrol-ZAK and nitrogen at the pressure of 0.73 MPa were given as boundary conditions for the simulation of steel cylinders of the same size and types of steel quenching. Figure 5 shows the comparison of calculated and experimental cooling curves of 100Cr6 steel cylinder in Kamgidrol-ZAK. Figure 6 shows the comparison of calculated and experimental cooling curves of 20CrNi4 steel cylinder in nitrogen at the pressure of 0.73 MPa. The difference in experimental and calculated curves is insignificant. The reason for the difference is in the thermal effect of martensitic transformation in steels which is difficult to take into consideration for simulation.

Example of practical application of data about the cooling ability of high-pressure nitrogen for predicting the results of quenching of alloyed steel parts is given in [18]. Results obtained during the simulation can be used to predict structural transformations and mechanical properties of parts after quenching [19–20].

thumbnail Fig. 3

Heat transfer coefficients of liquid quenchant (solid lines are for gradient probe, dashed lines are for prismatic probe with the side length 30 mm)
thumbnail Fig. 4

Heat transfer coefficients of high-pressure nitrogen (solid lines are for gradient probe, dashed lines are for prismatic probe with the side length 30 mm, dotted lines are for prismatic probe with the side length 20 mm)
thumbnail Fig. 5

Calculated (dashed lines) and experimental (solid lines) cooling curves at the center and near the surface of the 100Cr6 steel cylinder in Kamgidrol-ZAK 15% solution
thumbnail Fig. 6

Calculated (dashed lines) and experimental (solid lines) cooling curves at the center and near the surface of the 20CrNi4 steel cylinder in nitrogen at the pressure of 0.73 MPa

4 Conclusions

Temperature dependences of heat transfer coefficients for some liquid and gaseous quenching media were obtained using the probes of two different designs. The tests were carried out with liquid and gaseous quenching media. It was shown that the maximum heat transfer coefficient of the high-pressure nitrogen at a pressure of 0.73 MPa six times less than the heat transfer coefficient of the quenching oil. It was demonstrated that design and size of the probe do not significantly influence the value of heat transfer coefficient, which is the property of quenching medium itself and not depends on the way of its determination. The maximum difference between two probes results not exceed 20%. Therefore a smaller and simpler probe can be used for experimental determination of heat transfer coefficients.

Nomenclature

δ: Plate thickness

Δτ: Calculation range duration, s

λ: Thermal conductivity of plate material, W/(m·К)

ρ: Density of plate material, kg/m3

cN: Thermal capacity of plate material, J/(kg·К)

c: Average thermal capacity of probe material within the temperature range of tM1-tM2, J/(kg·К)

F: Probe surface area, m2

m: Probe mass, kg

R: Plate radius, mm

tМ1 andtM2: Average temperature within probe mass at the beginning and the end of calculation range, °С

tS1 and tS2: Average temperature of probe surface at the beginning and the end of calculation range, °С

tP and tC: Temperature at plate edges and plate center, °С

t*P andt*C: Temperature at plate edges and plate center at the previous time step, °С

t0: Temperature of the environment (quenching medium), °С

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation in the framework of the state task in the field of scientific activity of MSTU STANKIN No. 9.7453.2017/6.7.

References

  1. G.E. Totten, C.E. Bates, M.A. Clinton, Handbook of Quenchants and Quenching Technology, Materials Park, ASM International, United States 1993 [Google Scholar]
  2. B. Liscic, H.M. Tensi, L.C.F. Canale, G.E. Totten, Quenching Theory and Technology, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, Florida, United States 2010 [Google Scholar]
  3. G. Ramesh, K. Narayan Prabhu, Effect of Polymer Concentration on Wetting and Cooling Performance During Immersion Quenching, Metall. end Mater. Trans. B 47 (2016) 859–881 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. G. Ramesh, K. Narayan Prabhu, Comparative Study of Wetting and Cooling Performance of Polymer-Salt Hybrid Quench Medium With Conventional Quench Media, Exp. Heat Transf. 28 (2015) 464–492 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. X.F. Chen, L.Y. Zhang, X.H. Jie, Y. Li, X.Y. Huang, Quenching Characteristics Of Glycerol Solution As A Potential New Quenchant, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 109 (2017) 209–214 [Google Scholar]
  6. N. Lior, The cooling process in gas quenching, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 155–156 (2004) 1881–1888 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Z. Wang, X. Wang, X. Shang, The Effects of Nozzle and Workpiece Placements on Cooling Rate in the Vacuum High-pressure Gas Quenching Furnace Based on CFD, Appl. Mech. Mater. 66–68 (2011) 673–676 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. V. Heuer, D.R. Faron, D. Bolton, M. Lifshits, K. Loeser, Distortion Control of Transmission Components by Optimized High Pressure Gas Quenching, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 22 (2013) 1833–1838 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Yu. Aksenenko, V.N. Klimov, N.V. Korobova, V.I. Luzgin, S. Yu. Shevchenko, Effect of electromagnetic mixing in crystallization on the structure of thixopreforms from castable aluminum alloys, Metal Sci. Heat Treat. 55 (2014) 665–669 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. B. Liscic, Measurement and Recording of Quenching Intensity in Workshop Conditions Based on Temperature Gradients, Mater. Perform. Charac. 5 (2016) 202–219 [Google Scholar]
  11. B. Liscic, B. Smoljan, Evaluation of the Hardening Capacity of Low-Alloyed Steels Quenched by HPGQ in Vacuum Furnaces, Mater. Sci. Forum 879 (2016) 1807–1812 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. A.G. Ksenofontov, B.A. Prusakov, S.Y. Shevchenko, Heat flow sensor, RF Patent 2221226. 7G01 K17/20, Byull. Izobr. Polezn. Modeli 1 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  13. D.V. Budrin, E.L. Sukhanov, V.M. Kondratov, Application of a prism-shape hot probe for determining the cooling capacity of quenching media, Izv. Vysh. Ucheb. Zaved. Chern. Metall. 2 (1966) 134–139 [Google Scholar]
  14. S.Y. Shevchenko, Determination of heat transfer coefficients of quenching media with the help of prismatic sensor, Tekhnol. Met. 5 (2009) 39–42 [Google Scholar]
  15. V.V. Goryushin, S.Y. Shevchenko, On The Use Of Polymer Quenchants In Industry, Metal Sci. Heat Treat. 52 (2010) 255–259 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. N.I. Kobasko, Cooling Intensity Of Inverse Solubility Polyalkylene Glykol Polymers And Some Results Of Investigations Focused On Minimizing Distortion Of Metal Components, EUREKA: Phys. Eng. 2 (2017) 55–62 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Onan, H.I. Ünal, S.H. Atapek, C. Onan, Understanding Of Polymer Quenchant (Polyalkylene Glycol) Characteristic During Quenching Process Of Tool Steels, Int. J. Microstruct. Mater. Prop. 9 (2014) 71–78 [Google Scholar]
  18. S.Y. Shevchenko, A.E. Smirnov, I.V. Kirillov, N.A. Kurpyakova, A Study Of Quenching Cooling In Gaseous Atmospheres, Metal Sci. Heat Treat. 58 (2016) 461–465 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Jan, E. Prabhu, X. Chen, U. Weiss, Enhanced Heat Transfer Coefficient (HTC) Method to Model Air Quench Process: HTC Patching for More Accurate FEA Temperature Calculation SAE, Int. J. Passeng. Cars − Mech. Syst. 9 (2016) 489–496 [Google Scholar]
  20. B. Smoljan, D. Iljkic, G.E. Totten, Mathematical Modeling and Simulation of Hardness of Quenched and Tempered Steel, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 46B (2015) 2666–2673 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: S.Y. Shevchenko, Y.A. Melnik, A.E. Smirnov, W.Y.M. Htet, Comparative evaluation of methods for the determination of heat transfer coefficients of liquid and gaseous quenching media, Mechanics & Industry 18, 703 (2017)

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

Gradient probe body (a) and thermosensitive element (b)
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

Temperature measuring diagram (a) and prismatic probe body (b)
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

Heat transfer coefficients of liquid quenchant (solid lines are for gradient probe, dashed lines are for prismatic probe with the side length 30 mm)
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

Heat transfer coefficients of high-pressure nitrogen (solid lines are for gradient probe, dashed lines are for prismatic probe with the side length 30 mm, dotted lines are for prismatic probe with the side length 20 mm)
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5

Calculated (dashed lines) and experimental (solid lines) cooling curves at the center and near the surface of the 100Cr6 steel cylinder in Kamgidrol-ZAK 15% solution
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 6

Calculated (dashed lines) and experimental (solid lines) cooling curves at the center and near the surface of the 20CrNi4 steel cylinder in nitrogen at the pressure of 0.73 MPa
In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.