Issue 
Mechanics & Industry
Volume 19, Number 1, 2018



Article Number  110  
Number of page(s)  9  
DOI  https://doi.org/10.1051/meca/2018012  
Published online  31 August 2018 
Regular Article
Probability prediction of tensile strength with acoustic emission count of a glass fiber reinforced polyamide
Laboratoire de Mécanique de Sousse, Ecole Nationale d'Ingénieurs de Sousse Université de Sousse,
Bp.264 Erriadh,
4023
Sousse, Tunisie
^{*} email: mhallamaki@yahoo.fr
Received:
21
June
2016
Accepted:
10
February
2018
The aim of this paper is to develop a probabilistic approach for predicting the tensile strength behavior of a glass fiber reinforced polyamide. In the present study, the reliability of tensile strength is proposed based on the developed mathematical models, in which three factors with three levels are implemented. Glass fiber content, temperature and strain rate are chosen as the main input parameters in this study. The tensile strength is considered as output response which is evaluated through experimental tests. The “StrengthLoad” method with Monte Carlo simulation is implemented for computing the tensile strength reliability. The proposed approach leads to predict useful the tensile strength behavior for different parameters. In addition, a sensitivity analysis of some input parameters on the reliability is discussed. This method has been also used to analyze and discuss the influence of the dispersions of the glass fiber content and the temperature of a glass fiber reinforced polyamide.
Key words: Reliability approach / response surface methodology / thermoplastic composites / MonteCarlo simulation
© AFM, EDP Sciences 2018
1 Introduction
Due to their high specific strength and stiffness, glass fiber reinforced polyamides have been increasingly used in many applications these last decades, such as: stressed functional automotive parts (fuel injection rails, steering column switches) and safety parts (sports and leisure). Injection molding process is considered as the most conventional methods used for processing fiber reinforced thermoplastics compounds. It improves the mechanical properties over the unreinforced ones [1]. However, voids are always present in these injected materials in which cracks can be initiated and propagated in one of three regions: the matrix, the fiber or the fiber/matrix interface [2]. In this context, several works have dealt with the mechanical properties of thermoplastic composites containing short fibers. These properties result from a combination of the fiber, the matrix properties and the ability to transfer stresses across the fiber/matrix interface, but it also depends on many variables such as fiber ratio, diameter, length, orientation and the strain rate which are of prime importance to the final properties of the thermoplastic composites [3,4].
Behavior evolution of composite materials is phenomena affected by high uncertainties where the deterministic approach fails to estimate exactly the damage fracture. In this area, reliability approaches become more and more considered as an engineering design in industrial application [5,6]. However, few studies have dealt with the case of reliability approach through composite materials [7,8]. Xueyong et al. [7] identified the uncertainties in composite material properties based on reliability optimization. They tacked into account the scatterings and the significant dispersions related to the geometrical and material parameters. The Response Surface Methodology is applied by Zhigang et al. [8] to investigate the reliability and to evaluate the risk of failure for complex structures such as a 2.5D /SiC composite.
The objectives of the present paper consist in:
(i) the response surface methodology (RSM) coupled with experimental tests is used to investigate the effect and the interaction between the different factors (glass fiber content, temperature and strain rate) on the tensile strength of a glass fiber reinforced polyamide;
(ii) developing a probabilistic approach for evaluating the tensile strength reliability of a glass fiber reinforced polyamide by taking into account the dispersions of the glass fiber content and the temperature. The ‘StrengthLoad’ method coupled with the Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) is implemented for computing the reliability of our material.
2 Background of the Monte Carlo method
To compute the reliability, several numerical methods can be used [9,10], such as: (i) analytical resolution, (ii) approximate computational methods (firstorder reliability method: FORM and secondorder reliability method: SORM) and (iii) MCS.
The StrengthLoad approach is considered to be one of the most reliably computational methods to evaluate the risk [11,12].
To compute the reliability, one considers a vector of random variables {X} representing uncertain structural quantities. Let xi be an element of the random vector {X}, with a probability density function f_{Xi}(Xi). A performance function G({X}), separating the security and the failure fields is written as follows: (1) where G({X}) = 0 is the limit state function, S({X}) is the strength function and L({X}) is the load function [12]. In that case, if the inequality G({X})>0 is satisfied, this indicates a structural safety condition. In the opposite case, if G({X}) < 0, this means a failure of such a structure (Fig. 1). (2)with f_{Xi}(Xi) is the joint density function of G({x}).
The failure probability is used to quantify risks that the behaviors of the fracture exceed a given criterion. To compute the failure probability P_{f} is very difficult with analytical method this is due to the difficulty to knowf_{Xi}(Xi). For this reason, we can use the MCS: which is widely used in the case of high number of random variables and also when f_{Xi}(Xi) is practically difficult to find. Using several random sampling, the Monte Carlo method aims to simulate a high number of load and strength values according to their PDF. For a total number of simulation N, all events are represented by the computed values of G({x}). It is well established that the failure event frequency, defined by G({x}) < 0, extends towards the failure probability P_{f} when N → +∞ [13]. Generally N is taken equal to 10^{4}, it is an acceptable computational cost especially in the case of explicit function [14].
The failure probability P_{f} is then expressed as follows:
Finally, the reliability R is given by the following relationship: (4)
In this paper, we used the MCS to compute the reliability but an explicit relationship of the limit state function G({x}) is needed, for this reason a response surface methodology [15] is performed to determinate the limit state function G({x}).
3 Experimental work
3.1 Design
In this study, experiments were designed based on the experimental work given by Mouhmid et al. [16,17]. The main objective of the factorial experiments consists in studying the relationship between the different parameter levels and the response as a dependent variable. This approach helps to understand better how the change in the levels of each parameter can affect the response. The design required 27 experiments with 3 levels. The design was analyzed and generated using MINITAB 16.0 statistical package. Temperature, glass fiber content and strain rate are chosen as the main input parameters in this study. Table 1 shows the factors and their levels in coded and actual values.
Experimental parameters and their levels.
3.2 Experimental procedure
The material used in the present study was short glass fiber reinforced polyamide P66 with 2 mm of total thickness. The length (L) and width (W) of plate are 250 and 25 mm, respectively. The tensile tests were carried out with an Instron machine (10 kN) equipped with a temperature controlled chamber. The compounds were molded with a molding machine with a capacity of 80 tons. Tests were carried out at different parameters such as: the glass fiber content is selected to be between 0 and 30%, temperature is considered to be between 20 and 80 °C and strain rate ranges from 1 to 49 mm/min.
The experiments have been carried out according to the designed experimentation as illustrated in Table 2.
Experimental results.
3.3 Reliability assessment
Reliability methods have been established to take into account the uncertainties involved in the analysis of an engineering problem. In this approach, the Response Surface Method (RSM) can be used to evaluate the reliability. The dispersions taken into account in the present study are: (i) the Glass fiber content, (ii) the temperature.
The general procedure used for computing the tensile strength reliability of the short glass fiber reinforced polyamide P66 is detailed trough the following steps:
Step1: Evaluation of tensile strength using the design of experiments
In this step, the design of experiments based on full factorial design is implemented. The glass fiber content, temperature and strain rate are chosen as the main input parameters. The MINITAB statistical package was used for predicting the effect and the interaction of the input parameters on the tensile strength.
Step2: Building the explicit limit state functions G({x}) based on RSM
The computation of failure probability P_{f} in equation (2) is not easy. For this reason, MCS is developed. An explicit limit state function G depending on different random parameters based on the surface method is then needed. The Design of Experiments based on a full factorial design is used to build an explicit relationship of the basic safety margin, which links the tensile strength as a function of glass fiber content, temperature and strain rate using the response surface method.
Step3: Reliability updating assessment
In this work, the MCS method is used to calculate the reliability of a short glass fiber reinforced polyamide based on the explicit relationship developed in step 2. The glass fiber content and temperature with their corresponding dispersions are taken into account in the computing of the reliability. The different steps are detailed in the flowchart as shown in Figure 2.
Fig. 2
Flow chart for the reliability computation. 
4 Results and discussion
4.1 Development of mathematical models
The response surface method coupled with the experimental results is implemented for predicting the mathematical relationships of the tensile strength and the as a function of the glass fiber content, temperature and strain rate.
The analytical expression, obtained from analyzing the influences of the various dominant parameters on the tensile strength is given by: (5)
In order to validate and check the accuracy of the constructed RS model, some points are generated. Figure 3 shows the verification point's results obtained using Experiment and RS models. The high value of Rsquared (superior to 98.8%) indicated that the model was highly reliable in predicting the tensile strength. The results of the RS models are in a good correlation with experimental results and provide accurate and satisfactory results.
Fig. 3
Goodness of fit of RS model (Tensile strength). 
4.2 Effect and sensitivity analysis of input factors
The effects of strain rate, temperature and glass fiber content on the tensile strength are illustrated in Figure 4.
It is observed that the temperature was found as a significant parameter in which an increase in the temperature value leading to decrease the tensile strength. However, an increasing of the strain rate and the glass fiber content leading to increase in the tensile strength.
The obtained results are used to evaluate the percentage contribution of each input factor as shown in Figure 5. Additional, the Pareto chart indicates main and interaction effects considered statistically significant. As apparent, the glass fiber content has the strongest effect of 66% on the tensile strength, and the temperature contributes 25%.
From this analysis, it is confirmed that the effect of the strain rate was trivial, with a percentage contribution equals to 3.5% on the tensile strength. This observation is in good agreement with the previous results [18], in which they have found that the effect of strain on the strength tensile was negligible on the glass fiber reinforced polyamide composites.
The results show a low interaction between fiber content and the other parameters were observed. This observation is coherent with previous studies [19].
In this study, an analytical model is developed to predict the tensile strength of fiber glass reinforced polyamide using Response Surface Methodology.
Fig. 4
Main effect plot of , T and v_{f} on the value of the tensile strength. 
Fig. 5
Pareto chart of standardized effects on the tensile strength. 
4.3 Reliability analysis
4.3.1 Application
Fiber content and temperature are the main parameters that should be in better control of the production process in order to reduce the failure probability for tensile strength.
The experimental results are coupled with the reliabilityapproach using the Response Surface Method. The basic idea of this method is to approximate the system response by an explicit function and to determine their distribution as a function of the required variables. The dispersion parameter is characterized by their coefficient of variation which is calculated as the ratio between the mean values and the standard deviation. The principle steps of computation the reliability is shown in the flowchart in Figure 2. MATLAB software is used to determine the distribution of tensile strength as a function of both temperature and fiber content. Then, the MCS is implemented for evaluating the failure probability, but before the computed reliabilities, it is necessary to optimize Monte Carlo sample size N. For the studied cases, the random parameters, their law and their characteristics are reported in Table 3. The variation of the reliability with used sample size is shown in Table 4. It is observed that the discord between the computed reliabilities decreases with the Monte Carlo sample size N. When N is higher than 10^{4}, the percentage of the relative reliability variation value becomes less than 0.1%. According to these results, the choice of the N equal to 10^{4} is accepted [9].
Figures 6 and 7 illustrate the loading dispersion zones: case 1: tensile strength as a function of fiber content in which temperature is assumed to be normally distributed (Cov = 5%), case 2: tensile strength as a function of temperature in which fiber content is assumed to be normally distributed (Cov = 5%).
Data characteristics.
Sampling reliability computation (σ_{r}_{c} = 58 MPa, Covσ_{rc} = 5%, v_{f} = 0%, CovV_{f} = 5%, σ_{r} = 55 MPa).
Fig. 6
Evolution of σ_{r} versus fiber content with Cov = 5%. 
Fig. 7
Evolution of σ_{r} versus temperature with Cov = 5%. 
4.3.2 Reliability results

From Figures 8 and 9, we can deduce the significant effect of the two factors T and v_{f} on the reliability index which is calculated using the MCS. It is interesting to note that the reliability decreases when the critical tensile strength increases.
we can conclude that the ratio of fiber has a very important effect on tensile strength such that if we add the fiber the reliability increases and is always in the field of safety. As a consequence, we can conclude that reliability decreases when critical tensile strength increases. For a reliability of 50%, it is necessary to have 3% of the fiber content for σ_{rc} equal to 65 MPa. On the other hand, it is necessary to have 16% of the fiber content for σ_{rc} equal to 75 MPa.
Then, we note the nonlinearity of the range between the extreme values of the temperature corresponding to 0% and 100% of the reliability. For a low value of temperature, it is noted that the reliability is equal to 100% against if the temperature exceeds 50 °C (the glass transition temperature Tg of the polyamide 66 practically equal to 50 °C) the reliability decreases and tends to 0%. These results are in good agreement with the experimental study [17], where it was observed that the change in the behavior of the polyamide occurs significantly in the vicinity of the glass transition temperature (Tg) which is between 50 and 60 °C.
for safety condition of a glass fiber reinforced polyamide, the optimal parameters were obtained under the condition of 30% glass fiber content and 20 °C temperature.

The developed probabilistic approach takes into account the dispersion of the fiber content and the temperature in which the tensile strength is considered as output parameters. In order to study the effect of different input parameters on the tensile strength of glass reinforced polyamide, we assume that all the probabilistic variables follow a normal distribution characterized by means and Coefficient of Variation (CoV) values. Two parameters are considered as probabilistic design parameters with different (CoV) values.

Figures 10 and 11 presents the computed reliability curves plotted for the case of a CoV of 3%, the case of a CoV of 5% and the case of 10% of fiber content and the temperature. It shows the dispersion of the 10^{4} design points for the three cases of study. For v_{f} = 13%, the reliability R is approximated equal to 100% in the first case of study. For the second and third cases, the reliability decreases respectively to 92.3% and 70.7%. Then for T = 60 °C, a reliability of 99.8% is estimates for the first case of study. For the second and third cases, the reliability decreases respectively to 97.1% and 86.7%. It is observed that the scatter of the glass fiber content increases when the Cov value of the input temperature increases. As a consequence, we can observe a change of the range between the extreme values of the glass fiber content and the temperature, corresponding to the reliabilities of 0% and 100%.
Finally, it can be concluded that the change in the coefficient of variation of the fiber content and temperature has a significant effect on the reliability of our composite material.
Fig. 8
Reliability versus Glass fiber content with different critical tensile strength. 
Fig. 9
Reliability versus Temperature with different critical tensile strength. 
5 Conclusions
In this paper, a probabilistic approach based on the developed mathematical models for predicting the tensile strength reliability of a glass fiber reinforced polyamide is proposed. The StrengthLoad method coupled with the MCS is implemented for evaluating the reliability with different conditions.The Response Surface Method (RSM) is used to calculate the performance function G({X}) and their corresponding design points based on experimental results. An empirical relationship was developed based on the RSM approach for correlating the tensile strength with predominant process parameters. The basic idea of this method is to approximate the system response by an explicit function of random variables.
The following conclusions can be drawn:

a probabilistic approach has been developed to evaluate the tensile strength reliability as a function of the temperature and fiber content. This approach leads to improve the deterministic models by taking into account the various dispersions of: (i) temperature and (ii) fiber content which are very significant and rarely considered. This observation clearly shows the capability of the probabilistic model to correctly take into account the statistical distribution of the input parameters in composite materials;

based on the experimental observations and response surface methodology, we can investigate the tensile strength of our material with an analytical model. This result can be used also, to characterize qualitatively the effect of the different temperature and fiber content modifications. Moreover, we observe that an empirical relationship has been used to determine the damage threshold in the studied composites.
Nomenclature
σ_{r}_{c}: critical tensile strength (MPa)
V_{f}: fiber volume fraction (%)
{X}: vector of random variables
f_{Xi}(Xi): probability density function of the variable xi
RSM: Response Surface Methodology
G, S, L: performance, strength and load functions, respectively
FORM: first order reliability method
µ: average value of the random variables
σ: standard deviation of the random variables
Cov: coefficient of variation (ratio of the standard deviation of a distribution to its arithmetic mean)
N: Monte Carlo simulation sample size
Fig. 10
Reliability versus fiber content with different Cov. 
Fig. 11
Reliability versus Temperature with different Cov. 
References
 M. Akay, D.F. Oregan, ‘Fracture behaviour of glass fibre reinforced polyamide mouldings, Polym. Test. 14 (1995) 149–162 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 J.P. Tancrez, J. Pabiot, F. Rietsch. Damage and fracture mechanisms in thermoplasticmatrix composites in relation to processing and structural parameters, Compos. Sci. Technol. 56 (1996) 725–731 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 J.L. Thomason, The influence of fibre properties of the performance of glassfibrereinforced polyamide 66, Compos. Sci. Technol. 59 (1999) 2315–2328 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 S.Y. Fu, B. Lauke, A. San, Effect of fiber length and fiber orientation distributions on the tensile strength of short fiber reinforced polymers, Compos. Sci. Technol. 56 (1996) 1179–1190 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 C. Bouraoui, R.B. Sghaier, R. Fathallah, An engineering predictive design approach of high cycle fatigue reliability of shot peened metallic parts, Mater. Des. 30 (2009) 475–486 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 R.B. Sghaier, C. Bouraoui, R. Fathallah, T. Hassine, A. Dogui, Probabilistic high cycle fatigue behaviour prediction based on global approach criteria, Int. J. Fatigue 29 (2007) 209–221 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Q. Xueyong, R.T. Haftka, Deterministic and reliabilitybased optimization of composite laminates for cryogenic environments, AIAA J. 41 (2013) 10–19 [Google Scholar]
 Z. Sun, C. Wang, X. Niu, Y. Song, A response surface approach for reliability analysis of 2. 5D C/SiC composites turbine blade, Compos. Part B 85 (2016) 277–285 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 M. Lemaire, A. Chateauneuf, J.C. Mitteau, Fiabilité des structures: couplage mécanofiabiliste statique, Edit Hermes Paris 52 (2005) 620, [In French] [Google Scholar]
 H. Karadeniz, Uncertainty modeling in the fatigue reliability calculation of offshore structures, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 74 (2001) 23–35 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Y.G. Zhao, T. Ono, Oment for structural reliability, Struct. Saf. 23 (2001) 47–75 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 P. Bjerager, Methods for structural reliability computation: Reliability problems: general principles and applications in mechanics of solid and structures, Springer Verlag, New York, Vol. 8, 1991, pp. 89–136 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 A. Haldar, S. Mahadevan, Probability, reliability, and statistical methods in engineering design, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000 [Google Scholar]
 R. Rackwitz, Reliability analysis: a review and some perspectives, Struct. Saf. 23 (2001) 365–395 [Google Scholar]
 R.H. Myers, D.H. Montgomery, Response surface methodology, John Wiley & Sons, USA, 1995 [Google Scholar]
 B. Mouhmid, A. Imad, N. Benseddiq, S. Benmedakhène and A. Maazouz, A study of the mechanical behaviour of a glass fibre reinforced polyamide 6, 6: Experimental investigation, Polym. Test. 25 (2006) 544–552 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 B. Mouhmid, Etude de l'endommagement et de la rupture d'un polyamide 66 chargé en fibres de verre courtes, Thèse, Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, 2007 [Google Scholar]
 V. Ceolho, Effects of strain rate and temperature on the mechanical properties of gfrp composites, Therm. Eng. 10 (2011) 03–06 [Google Scholar]
 M. Todo, K. Takahashi, P. Beguelin, H. Kausch, Strain rate dependence of the tensile fracture behaviour of woven cloth reinforced polyamide composites, Compos. Sci. Technol. 60 (2000) 763–771 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Cite this article as: M.M. Mhalla, A. Bahloul, C. Bouraoui, Probability prediction of tensile strength with acoustic emission count of a glass fiber reinforced polyamide, Mechanics & Industry 19, 110 (2018)
All Tables
Sampling reliability computation (σ_{r}_{c} = 58 MPa, Covσ_{rc} = 5%, v_{f} = 0%, CovV_{f} = 5%, σ_{r} = 55 MPa).
All Figures
Fig. 1
Probability density function of G (x) [12]. 

In the text 
Fig. 2
Flow chart for the reliability computation. 

In the text 
Fig. 3
Goodness of fit of RS model (Tensile strength). 

In the text 
Fig. 4
Main effect plot of , T and v_{f} on the value of the tensile strength. 

In the text 
Fig. 5
Pareto chart of standardized effects on the tensile strength. 

In the text 
Fig. 6
Evolution of σ_{r} versus fiber content with Cov = 5%. 

In the text 
Fig. 7
Evolution of σ_{r} versus temperature with Cov = 5%. 

In the text 
Fig. 8
Reliability versus Glass fiber content with different critical tensile strength. 

In the text 
Fig. 9
Reliability versus Temperature with different critical tensile strength. 

In the text 
Fig. 10
Reliability versus fiber content with different Cov. 

In the text 
Fig. 11
Reliability versus Temperature with different Cov. 

In the text 
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (fulltext article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 4896 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.