Open Access
Mécanique & Industries
Volume 11, Number 3-4, Mai-Août 2010
Giens 2009
Page(s) 215 - 221
Published online 27 October 2010
  1. O. Schenk, M. Hillmann, Optimal design of metal forming die surfaces with evolution strategies, Comput. Struct. 82 (2004) 1695–1705 [Google Scholar]
  2. T. Jansson, L. Nilsson, Minimizing the risk of failure in a sheet metal forming process, Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 31 (2006) 320–332 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. H.B. Shim, K.C. Son, Optimal blank shape design by sensitivity method, J. Materials Processing Technology 104 (2000) 191–199 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Hino, F. Yoshida, V.V. Toropov, Optimum blank design for sheet metal forming based on the interaction of high and low fidelity FE models, Arch. Appl. Mech. 75 (2006) 679–691 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. H. Naceur, Y.Q. Guo, J.L. Batoz, C. Knopf-Lenoir, Optimization of drawbead restraining forces and drawbead Design in sheet metal forming process, International J. Mechanical Sci. 43 (2001) 2407–2434 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. B.T. Lin, C.C. Kuo, Application of an integrated CAD/CAE/CAM system for stamping dies for automobiles, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 35 (2008) 1000–1013 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. L. Piegl, T. Wayne, The NURBS Book, 2nd ed. Springer, 1997 [Google Scholar]
  8. Document d’aide “Open Cascade Technology” version 6.1, 2006 [Google Scholar]
  9. S.A. Coons, Surfaces for computer aided design of space form. Technical rept., Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridge, USA, 1967 [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Laug, Topologie et maillage des surfaces paramétrées à partir d’une modélisation B-Rep, 17e Congrès Français de Mécanique, 2005, 1319 [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Laug, H. Borouchaki, BLSURF – Mailleur de surfaces composées de carreaux paramétrés – Manuel d’utilisation, thème 4, 1999 [Google Scholar]
  12. J.L. Zhou, A.L. Tits, A SQP algorithm for finely discretized continuous minimax problems and other minimax problems with many objective functions, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 6 (1993) 467–481 [Google Scholar]
  13. R.H. Myers, D.C. Montgomery, Response Surface Methodology, Wiley, NY, 2002 [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Lancaster, K. Salkauskas. Surfaces generated by moving least squares methods, Math. Comput. 37 (1981) 141–158 [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Sacks, W.J. Welch, T.J. Mitchell, H.P. Wynn, Design and analysis of computer experiments, Statist. Sci. 4 (1989) 409–435 [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Dong, Conception automatique et optimisation des surfaces additionnelles pour le procédé d’emboutissage de tôles minces en utilisant une approche inverse, Thèse de doctorat, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, mars 2009 [Google Scholar]
  17. J.L. Batoz, Y.Q. Guo, F. Mercier, The inverse approach with simple triangular shell elements for large strain predictions of sheet metal forming parts, Eng. Comput. 15 (1998) 864–892 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Y.Q. Guo, J.L. Batoz, S. Bouabdallah, H. Naceur, Recent developments on the Analysis and Optimum Design of Sheet Metal Forming Parts using a Simplified Inverse Approach, Int. J. Comput. Struct. 78 (2000) 133–148 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.