Open Access
Mécanique & Industries
Volume 12, Number 6, 2011
Page(s) 479 - 486
Published online 15 September 2011
  1. M. Terrier, Optimisation du processus de fabrication en usinage à grande vitesse sur machines-outils à structure parallèle, Thèse de doctorat en Génie Mécanique, École Centrale de Nantes, 2005 [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Pritschow, C. Eppler, T. Garber, Influence of the dynamic stiffness on the accuracy of PKM, 3rd Chemnitz parallel kinematic seminar, Chemnitz, Germany, 2002, pp. 313–333 [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Hertel, Requirement for parallel kinematics for powertrain manufacturing in the automotive industry, 3rd Chemnitz parallel kinematic seminar, Chemnitz, Germany, 2002, pp. 753–762 [Google Scholar]
  4. N. Hennes, Ecospeed – an innovative machinery concept for high performance 5 axis machining of large structural components in aircraft engineering, 3rd Chemnitz parallel kinematic seminar, Chemnitz, Germany, 2002, pp. 763–774 [Google Scholar]
  5. K.E. Neumann, Exechon Concept – Parallel Kinematic Machines in Research and Practice (PKS’2006), Chemnitz, Germany, 2006, pp. 787–802 [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Bonnemains, Étude du comportement mécanique des machines outils à structure parallèle en usinage grande vitesse, Thèse de doctorat, Université Blaise Pascal-Clermont II, 2009 [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Geldart, P. Webb, H. Larsson, M. Backstrom, N. Gindy, K. Rask, A direct comparison of the machining performance of a varix 5 axis parallel kinematic machining centre with conventional 3 and 5 axis machine tools, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 43 (2003) 1107–1116 [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Angeles, Fundamentals of Robotic Mechanical Systems, Springer-Verlag, ISBN: 0-387-95368-X, 1997 [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Tlusty, J. Ziegert, S. Ridgeway, Fundamental comparison of the use of serial and parallel kinematics for machine tools, Annals of CIRP 48 (1999) 351–356 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. H. Chanal, E. Duc, J.Y. Hascoët, P. Ray, Reduction of a parallel kinematics machine tool inverse kinematics model with regard to machining behaviour, Mech. Mach. Theory 44 (2009) 1371–1385 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. J.M. Langeron, E. Duc, C. Lartigue, P. Bourdet, A new format for 5 axis tool path computation using Bspline curves, Computer Aided Design 36 (2004) 1219–1229 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. K. Erkorkmaz, Y. Altintas, High speed CNC system design. Part I: jerk limited trajectory generation and quintic spline interpolation, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 41 (2001) 1323–1345 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. U. Bravo, O. Altuzarra, L.N. López de Lacalle, J.A. Sánchez, F.J. Campa, Stability limits of milling considering the flexibily of the workpiece and the machine, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 45 (2005) 1669–1680 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Seguy, G. Dessein, L. Arnaud, Surface roughness variation of thin wall milling, related to modal interactions, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 48 (2008) 261–274 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Bearee, Prise en compte des phénomènes vibratoires dans la génération de commande des machines-outils à dynamique élevée, Thèse de doctorat en Automatique, ENSAM Lille, 2005 [Google Scholar]
  16. V. Pateloup, E. Duc, P. Ray, Bspline approximation of circle arc and straight line for pocket machining, Computer Aided Design 42 (2010) 17–827 [Google Scholar]
  17. C. Castagnetti, E. Duc, P. Ray, The domain of Admissible Orientation concept: A new method for five axis tool path optimisation, Computer Aided Design 40 (2008) 938–950 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. J.P. Merlet, Les robots parallèles, Hermès, ISBN : 2-86601-599-1, 1997 [Google Scholar]
  19. T. Kim, S.E. Sarma, Tool path generation along directions of kinematic performance: a first cut at machine optimal paths, Computer-Aided Design 34 (2002) 453–468 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.