EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 14 / No 3 (2013) Mechanics & Industry, 14 3 (2013) 159-174 References
Open Access
Issue
Mechanics & Industry
Volume 14, Number 3, 2013
Page(s) 159 - 174
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/meca/2013056
Published online 12 June 2013
  1. L. Cambier, M. Gazaix, elsA: an efficient Object-Oriented solution to CFD complexity, 40th AIAA ASM, Reno, AIAA Paper 2002-0108, 2002 [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Gazaix, A. Jollès, M. Lazareff, The elsA Object-Oriented tool for industrial applications, 23rd ICAS meeting, Toronto, 2002 [Google Scholar]
  3. L. Cambier, J.-P. Veuillot, Status of the elsA Software for Flow Simulation and Multi-Disciplinary Applications, 46th AIAA ASM, Reno, AIAA Paper 2008-0664, 2008 [Google Scholar]
  4. L. Cambier, N. Kroll, MIRACLE – A joint DLR/ONERA Effort on Harmonization and Development of Industrial and Research Aerodynamic Computational Environment, Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 12 (2008) 555–566 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. L. Cambier, M. Gazaix, S. Heib, S. Plot, M. Poinot, J.-P. Veuillot, J.-F. Boussuge, M. Montagnac, An Overview of the Multi-Purpose elsA Flow Solver, Aerospace Lab 2 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Reneaux, P. Beaumier, P. Girodroux-Lavigne, Advanced Aerodynamic Applications with the elsA Software, Aerospace Lab 2 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Aupoix, D. Arnal, H. Bézard, B. Chaouat, F. Chedevergne, S. Deck, V. Gleize, P. Grenard, E. Laroche, Transition and turbulence modeling, Aerospace Lab 2 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  8. H. Bézard, T. Daris, Calibrating the Length Scale Equation with an Explicit Algebraic Reynolds Stress Constitutive Relation, 6th Int. Symp. on Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Measurements, in Sardinia, W. Rodi and M. Mulas (eds.), Elsevier (2005) 77–86 [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Deck, Zonal-Detached Eddy Simulation of the Flow over a High-Lift Configuration, AIAA J. 43 (2005) 2372−2384 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Deck, Recent improvements of the Zonal Detached Eddy Simulation (ZDES) formulation, Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 26 (2012) 523–550 [Google Scholar]
  11. T. Renaud, M. Costes, S. Péron, Computation of GOAHEAD configuration with Chimera assembly, Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 19 (2012) 50–57 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Péron, C. Benoit, Automatic off-body overset adaptive Cartesian mesh method based on an octree approach, J. Comput. Phys. 232 (2013) 153–173 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. G. Puigt, M. Gazaix, M. Montagnac, M.-C. Le Pape, M. de la Llave Plata, C. Marmignon, J.-F. Boussuge, V. Couaillier, Development of a new hybrid compressible solver inside the CFD elsA software, 20th AIAA CFD Conf., Honolulu, AIAA Paper 2011-3379, 2011 [Google Scholar]
  14. M. de la Llave Plata, V. Couaillier, M.-C. Le Pape, C. Marmignon,elsA-Hybrid: an all-in-one structured/unstructured solver for the simulation of internal and external flows. Application to turbomachinery, 4th EUCASS Conf., Saint-Petersburg, 2011 [Google Scholar]
  15. M. de la Llave Plata, V. Couaillier, C. Marmignon, M.-C. Le Pape, M. Gazaix, B. Cantaloube, Further developments in the multiblock hybrid CFD solver elsA-H, 40th AIAA ASM, Nashville, AIAA Paper 2012–1112, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Errera, A. Dugeai, P. Girodroux-Lavigne, M. Poinot, Multi-physics coupling approaches for aerospace numerical simulations, Aerospace Lab 2 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Dugeai, Y. Mauffrey, F. Sicot, Aeroelastic capabilities of the elsA solver for rotating machines applications, International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Paris, 2011 [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Peter, G. Carrier, D. Bailly, P. Klotz, M. Marcelet, F. Renac, Local and global search methods for design in aeronautics, Aerospace Lab 2 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Peter, R. Dwight, Numerical sensitivity analysis for aerodynamic optimization: A survey of approaches, Comput. Fluids 39 (2010) 373–391 [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Fosso-Pouangué, H. Deniau, F. Sicot, P. Sagaut, Curvilinear finite volume schemes using high order compact interpolation, J. Comput. Phys. 229 (2010) 5090 − 5122 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Fosso-Pouangué, H. Deniau, N. Lamarque, T. Poinsot, Comparison of outflow boundary conditions for subsonic aeroacoustic simulations, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids (2012) [Google Scholar]
  22. G. Dufour, F. Sicot, G. Puigt, C. Liauzun, A. Dugeai, Oscillating-Flap Simulations with the Time-Spectral and Linearized Methods, AIAA J. 48 (2010) 788–797 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. F. Sicot, G. Dufour, N. Gourdain, A time-domain harmonic balance method for rotor/stator interactions, J. Turbomach. 134 (2012) 011001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Y. Colin, H. Deniau, J.-F. Boussuge, A robust low speed preconditioning formulation for viscous flow computations, Comput. Fluids 47 (2011) 1–15 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. N. Gourdain, L. Gicquel, M. Montagnac, O. Vermorel, M. Gazaix, G. Staffelbach, M. Garcia, J.-F. Boussuge, T. Poinsot, High performance parallel computing of flows in complex geometries – part 1: methods, Comput. Sci. Discovery 2 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  26. H. Tartousi, P. Kulisa, F. Leboeuf, G. Ngo Boum, A. Lefebvre, A. Yammine, Numerical investigation of a turbocharger centrifugal compressor: volute influence on the performance of the compressor, 9th European Turbomachinery Conf., Istanbul, 2011 [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Mesbah, J.-F. Thomas, F. Thirifay, R. Viguié, F. Durieu, V. Iliopoulou, O. De Vriendt, Investigation of compressor blade vibrations due to subharmonic aerodynamic excitations, 13th Int. Symp. on Unsteady Aerodynamics, Aeroacoustics and Aeroelasticity of Turbomachines (ISUAAAT), Tokyo, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  28. B. Michel, P. Cinnella, A. Lerat, Multiblock residual-based compact schemes for the computation of complex turbomachinery flows, Int. J. Eng. Systems Model. Simul. 3 (2011) 2–15 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Lerat, P. Cinnella, B. Michel, F. Falissard, High-order residual-based compact schemes for aerodynamics and aeroacoustics, Comput. Fluids 61 (2012) 31–38 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. J. Babajee, T. Arts, Investigation of the laminar separation-induced transition with the γ-Reθt transition model on one very high-lift low-pressure turbine (T2) and one engine-like scale low-pressure turbine (TX) rotor blades at steady conditions and freestream turbulence, 47th 3AF Int. Symp. of Applied Aerodynamics, Paris, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Stanciu, Y. Fendler, J.-M. Dorey, Unsteady stator-rotor interaction coupled with exhaust hood effect for last stage steam turbines, 9th European Turbomachinery Conf., Istanbul, 2011 [Google Scholar]
  32. S. Péron, C. Benoit, A Python module for Chimera assembly, 10th Overset Grid Symposium, http://www.onera.fr/dsna/cassiopee/images/2010-09-OversetGridConnector.pdf, NASA Ames, Moffett Field, 2010 [Google Scholar]
  33. S. Wallin, A.-V. Johansson, An explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model for incompressible and compressible turbulent flows, J. Fluid Mech. 403 (2000) 89–132 [Google Scholar]
  34. V. Brunet, Random flow generation technique for civil aircraft jet simulations with the ZDES approach, 4th Symp. on Hybrid RANS-LES methods, Beijing, 2011 [Google Scholar]
  35. A. Smirnov, S. Shi, I. Celik, Random Flow Generation Technique for Large Eddy Simulations and Particle Dynamics Modeling, J. Fluid Eng. 123 (2001) 359–371 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. S. Mouton, M. Lyonnet, Y. Le Sant, Prediction of the aerodynamic effect of model deformation during transonic wind tunnel tests, 47th 3AF Int. Symp. of Applied Aerodynamics, Paris, 2012 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.