Open Access
Mechanics & Industry
Volume 16, Number 4, 2015
Article Number 404
Number of page(s) 10
Published online 27 April 2015
  1. H.G. Matthies, C.E. Brenner, C.G. Bucher, C. Guedes Soares, Uncertainties in probabilistic numerical analysis of structures solids-Stochastic finite elements, Struct. Safety 19 (1997) 283–336 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. G.I. Schuëller, A state-of-the-art report on computational stochastic mechanics, Probab. Eng. Mech. 12 (1997) 197–321 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Grigoriu, Stochastic mechanics, Int. J. Solids Struct. 37 (2000) 197–214 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. G.S. Fishman, Monte Carlo: Concepts, Algorithms and Applications, Springer-Verlag, 1996 [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Kleiber, T.D. Hien, The stochastic finite element method: basic perturbation technique computer implementation, John Wiley & Sons, Engl, 1992 [Google Scholar]
  6. R.G. Ghanem, P.D. Spanos, Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach, Springer-Verlag, 1991 [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Willcox, J. Peraire, Balanced model reduction via the proper orthogonal decomposition, AIAA J. 40 (2002) 2323–2330 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Chinesta, P. Ladevèze, E. Cueto, A short review on model order reduction based on proper generalized decomposition, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 18 (2011) 395–404 [Google Scholar]
  9. D. Moens, M. Hanss, Non-probabilistic finite element analysis for parametric uncertainty treatment in applied mechanics: Recent advances, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 47 (2011) 4–16 [Google Scholar]
  10. O. Dessombz, F. Thouverez, J.-P. Laîné, L. Jézéquel, Analysis of mechanical systems using interval computations applied to finite element methods, J. Sound Vib. 239 (2001) 949–968 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. R.L. Muhanna, R.L. Mullen, Uncertainty in mechanics problems–Interval-based approach, J. Eng. Mech. 127 (2001) 557–566 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. J.-P. Merlet, Interval analysis for certified numerical solution of problems in robotics, Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 19 (2009) 399–412 [Google Scholar]
  13. F. Massa, K. Ruffin, T. Tison, B. Lallem, A complete method for efficient fuzzy modal analysis, J. Sound Vib. 309 (2008) 63–85 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. G. Quaranta, Finite element analysis with uncertain probabilities, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 200 (2011) 114–129 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Y. Ben-Haim, Information-gap Decision Theory: Decisions Under Severe Uncertainty, 2nd edition, Academic Press, 2006 [Google Scholar]
  16. G.J. Klir, Uncertainty information: foundations of generalized information theory, John Wiley & Sons, 2005 [Google Scholar]
  17. H. Bae, R.V. Grhi, R.A. Canfield, An approximation approach for uncertainty quantification using evidence theory, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety 86 (2004) 215–225 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. C. Soize, A nonparametric model of random uncertainties for reduced matrix models in structural dynamics, Probab. Eng. Mech. 15 (2000) 277–294 [Google Scholar]
  19. C. Soize, Maximum entropy approach for modeling random uncertainties in transient elastodynamics, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109 (2001) 1979–1996 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Ladevèze, G. Puel, T. Romeuf, Lack of knowledge in structural model validation, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 195 (2006) 4697–4710 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. F. Louf, P. Enjalbert, P. Ladevèze, T. Romeuf, On lack-of-knowledge theory in structural mechanics, C. R. Mécanique 338 (2010) 424–433 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Papadrakakis, A. Kotsopulos, Parallel solution methods for stochastic finite element analysis using Monte Carlo simulation, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 168 (1999) 305–320 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. G.I. Schuëller, C.G. Bucher, U. Bourgund, W. Ouypornprasert, On efficient computational schemes to calculate structural failure probabilities, Probab. Eng. Mech. 4 (1989) 10–18 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. R.E. Caflisch, Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte Carlo methods, Acta Numerica 7 (1998) 1–49 [Google Scholar]
  25. G. Blatman, B. Sudret, M. Berveiller, Quasi random numbers in stochastic finite element analysis, Mech. Ind. 8 (2007) 289–298 [Google Scholar]
  26. J.C. Helton, F.J. Davis, Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety 81 (2003) 23–69 [Google Scholar]
  27. O. Ditlevsen, H.O. Madsen, Structural Reliability Methods, John Wiley & Sons, 1996, Vol. 178 [Google Scholar]
  28. B. Huang, X. Du, Probabilistic uncertainty analysis by mean-value first order saddlepoint approximation, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety 93 (2008) 325–336 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. B. Sudret, A. Der Kiureghian, Stochastic finite element methods reliability: a state-of-the-art report, Department of Civil Environmental Engineering, University of California, 2000 [Google Scholar]
  30. G. Stefanou, The stochastic finite element method: past, present and future, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 198 (2009) 1031–1051 [Google Scholar]
  31. C.-C. Li, A. Der Kiureghian, Optimal discretization of random fields, J. Eng. Mech. 119 (1993) 1136–1154 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. B. Van den Nieuwenhof, J.-P. Coyette, Modal approaches for the stochastic finite element analysis of structures with material and geometric uncertainties, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 192 (2003) 3705–3729 [Google Scholar]
  33. M. Shinozuka, G. Deodatis, Response variability of stochastic finite element systems, J. Eng. Mech. 114 (1988) 499–519 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. F. Yamazaki, M. Shinozuka, G. Dasgupta, Neumann expansion for stochastic finite element analysis, J. Eng. Mech. 114 (1988) 1335–1354 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. M. Papadrakakis, V. Papadopoulos, Robust efficient methods for stochastic finite element analysis using Monte Carlo simulation, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 134 (1996) 325–340 [Google Scholar]
  36. D. Xiu, G.E. Karniadakis, The Wiener-Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 24 (2002) 619–644 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  37. G. Blatman, B. Sudret, Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression, J. Comput. Phys. 230 (2011) 2345–2367 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. A. Doostan, R.G. Ghanem, J. Red-Horse, Stochastic model reduction for chaos representations, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 196 (2007) 3951–3966 [Google Scholar]
  39. D. Ryckelynck, A priori hyperreduction method: an adaptive approach, J. Comput. Phys. 202 (2005) 346–366 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. G. Rozza, D.B.P. Huynh, A.T. Patera, Reduced basis approximation and a posteriori error estimation for affinely parametrized elliptic coercive partial differential equations, Archives Comput. Methods Eng. 15 (2008) 229–275 [Google Scholar]
  41. E. Balmès, Efficient sensitivity analysis based on finite element model reduction, In Proc. IMAC XVII, SEM, Santa Barbara, CA, 1998, pp. 1168–1174 [Google Scholar]
  42. A. Nouy, A priori model reduction through proper generalized decomposition for solving time-dependent partial differential equations, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 199 (2010) 1603–1626 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  43. F. Chinesta, A. Ammar, A. Leygue, R. Keunings, An overview of the proper generalized decomposition with applications in computational rheology, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 166 (2011) 578–592 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. A. Nouy, O.P. Le Maître, Generalized spectral decomposition for stochastic nonlinear problems, J. Comput. Phys. 228 (2009) 202–235 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. F. Louf, L. Champaney, Fast validation of stochastic structural models using a PGD reduction scheme, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 70–71 (2013) 44–56 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. F. Chinesta, A. Ammar, E. Cueto, Recent advances and new challenges in the use of the proper generalized decomposition for solving multidimensional models, Archives Comput. Methods Eng. 17 (2010) 327–350 [Google Scholar]
  47. C. Soize, random matrix theory for modeling uncertainties in computational mechanics, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 194 (2005) 1333–1366 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. C. Soize, Generalized probabilistic approach of uncertainties in computational dynamics using random matrices and polynomial chaos decompositions, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 81 (2010) 939–970 [Google Scholar]
  49. P. Ladevèze, G. Puel, T. Romeuf, On a strategy for the reduction of the lack of knowledge (LOK) in model validation, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety 91 (2006) 1452–1460 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. S. Audebert, SICODYN international benchmark on dynamic analysis of structure assemblies: variability and numerical-experimental correlation on an industrial pump, Mécanique & Industries 11 (2010) 439–451 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  51. S. Audebert, A. Mikchevitch, I. Zentner, SICODYN international benchmark on dynamic analysis of structure assemblies: variability numerical-experimental correlation on an industrial pump (part 2), Mechanics & Industry 15 (2014) 1–17 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  52. A. Batou, C. Soize, S. Audebert, Model identification in computational stochastic dynamics using experimental modal data, Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 50-51 (2015) 307–322 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.