Open Access
Mechanics & Industry
Volume 18, Number 6, 2017
Article Number 605
Number of page(s) 8
Published online 02 February 2018
  1. R. Kopp, J. Schulz, Flexible sheet forming technology by double-sided simultaneous shot peen forming, J. Manuf. Technol. 51 (2002) 195–198 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. D.L. Baughman, An overview of peen forming technology, Pangborn Company, Proc. 2nd Conf. Shot Peening (ICSP2), 1968 [Google Scholar]
  3. E. Mohseni, E. Zalnezhad, A.A.D. Sarhan, A.R. Bushroa, A study on surface modification of Al7075-T6 alloy against fretting fatigue phenomenon, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2014 (2014) 1–17 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Y.F. Al-Obaid, Shot peeing mechanics: experimental and theoretical analysis, J. Mech. Mater. 19 (1995) 251–260 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Bagherifard, R. Ghelichi, M. Guagliano, A numerical model of severe shot peening (SSP) to predict the generation of a nanostructured surface layer of material, J. Surf. Coat. Technol. 204 (2010) 4081–4090 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. H.Y. Miao, D. Demers, S. Larose, C. Perron, M. Lévesque, Experimental study of shot peening and stress peen forming, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 210 (2010) 2089–2102 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Bhuvaraghan, S.M. Srinivasan, B. Maffeo, R.D. McCLain, Y. Potdar, O. Prakash, Shot peening simulation using discrete and finite element method, J. Adv. Eng. Softw. 41 (2010) 1266–1276 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. L. Zhiming. S. Laimin, Z. Shenjin, T. Zhidong, J. Yazhou, Effect of high energy shot peening pressure on the stress corrosion cracking of the weld joint of 304 austenitic stainless steel, J. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 637 (2015) 170–174 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. B.L. Sun, Y.J. Wang, J. Y. Xiao, G.Q. Gao, M.J. Qiao, X.D. Xiao, Evaluation of microstructure and properties of induced by shot peening, Procedia Eng. 81 (2014) 1043–1048 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. S.A. Meguid, G. Shagal, J.C. Stranart, 3D FE analysis of peening of strain-rate sensitive materials using multiple impingement model, Int. J. Impact Eng. 27 (2002) 119–134 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. H.Y. Miao, S. Larose, C. Perron, M. Lévesque, Numerical simulation of the stress peen forming process and experimental validation, J. Adv. Eng. Softw. 42 (2011) 963–975 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Seddik, A. Bahloul, A. Atig, R. Fathallah, A simple methodology to optimize shot-peening process parameters using finite element simulations, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 90 (2017) 2345–2361 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. O. Unal, Optimization of shot peening parameters by response surface methodology, Surf. Coat. Technol. 305 (2016) 99–109 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Y.S. Nam, U. Jeon, H.K. Yoon, B.C. Shin, J.H. Byun, Use of response surface methodology for shot peening process optimization of an aircraft structural part, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 87 (2016) 2967–2981 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Badreddine, E. Rouhaud, M. Micoulaut, D. Retraint, S. Remy, M. François, P. Viot, G. Doubre-Baboeuf, D.L. Saunier, V. Desfontaine, Simulation and experimental approach for shot velocity evaluation in ultrasonic shot peening, J. Mech. Ind. 12 (2011) 223–229 [Google Scholar]
  16. J.E. Rodriguez-Sanchez, A. Rodriguez-Castellanos, F. Perez-Guerrero, Shot peening effect on fatigue crack repaired weldments, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017 (2017) 1–11 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Zhang, S. Lu, Z. Zhou, T. Wu, G. Xu, Modeling of multiple shots for analyzing shot peening controlled parameters on formed curvature radius, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. (2017), doi:10.1007/s00170-017-0629-y [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Shivpuri, X. Cheng, Y. Mao, Elasto-plastic pseudo-dynamic numerical model for the design of shot peening process parameters, Mater. Des. 30 (2009) 3112–3120 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. A.I. Khuri, S. Mukhopadhyay, Response surface methodology, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Stat. 2 (2010) 128–144 [Google Scholar]
  20. H. Sahai, M.M. Ojeda, Analysis of variance for random models (2004), doi:10.1007/978-0-8176-8168-5 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Design-Expert 7.1 User's Guide, 2007 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.