Open Access
Mechanics & Industry
Volume 21, Number 6, 2020
Article Number 619
Number of page(s) 8
Published online 18 December 2020
  1. K. Gjika, P. Mahadevan, A. Costeux, Turbocharger synchronous vibration control on high speed balancer. Test and prediction, ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 136, 071603 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. K. Gjika, A. Costeux, P. Mahadevan, W. Meacham, L. Stuart, G. Gaude, VUCT − a consolidated product–process approach for DFM, balancing technology performance and vibration control on vehicle, The Exponent 6 , (2014) [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Wilson, F. Daguin, G. Gaude, K. Gjika, P. Francois, P. Talbert, Turbocharger noise: a continuous challenge, The Exponent 6 , (2014) [Google Scholar]
  4. B. Schweizer, M. Sievert, Nonlinear oscillations of automotive turbocharger turbine, Journal of Sound and Vibration 321 , 955–975 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  5. K.L. Cavalca, P.F. Cavalcante, E.P. Okabe, An investigation on the influence of the supporting structure on the dynamics of the rotor system, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 19 , 157–174 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Dakel, S. Baguet, R. Dufour, Steady-state dynamic behavior of an on-board rotor under combined base motions, Journal of Vibration and Control 20 , 2254–2287 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. D.J. Ewins, Modal testing: theory and practice, Research Studies Press LTD., Letchworth Hertfordshire, England, 1984 [Google Scholar]
  8. T. Yamaguchi, M. Ogawa, T. Kasahara, N. Arakawa, Advanced measurement method of frequency response function, Proceedings of the 3rd International Modal Analysis Conference , Orlando, Florida, Volume I, pp. 565–568, 1985 [Google Scholar]
  9. J.C. Nicholas, J.K. Whalen, S.D. Franklin, Improving critical speed calculations using flexible bearing support FRF compliance data, Proceedings of the 15th Turbomachinery Symposium , Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 1986 [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Xu, J.M. Vance, Experimental determination of rotor foundation parameters for improved critical speed predictions, ASME Paper No. 97-GT-449, 1997 [Google Scholar]
  11. J.A. Vazquez, L.E. Barrett, R.D. Flack, Including the effects of flexible bearing supports in rotating machinery, International Journal of Rotating Machinery 7 , 223–236 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. J.A. Vazquez, L.E. Barrett, R.D. Flack, Flexible bearing supports, using experimental data, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 124 , 369 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  13. K. Shaposhnikov, X. Wu, C. Gao, Influence of foundation and support structure elasticity on rotordynamics of 2 MW gas turbine engine, Proceedings of the International Gas Turbine Congress 2019, Tokyo [Google Scholar]
  14. K. Gjika, Turbocharger bearing systems technology − challenges and strategic developments, Garrett Booster Magazine, pp. 6–11 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  15. G. LaRue et al., Turbocharger with hydrodynamic foil bearings, United States Patent No: US 7, 108, 488 B2, 2006 [Google Scholar]
  16. T.A. Harris, M.N. Kotzalas, Rolling bearing analysis, 5th edition, CRC Press, Boca Baton, Florida, 2006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Sánchez‐Rubio, F. Chinas‐Castillo, F. Ruiz‐Aquino, J. Lara‐Romero, A new focus on the Walther equation for lubricant viscosity determination, Lubrication Science 18 , 95–108 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. O. Pinkus, B. Sternlicht, Theory of hydrodynamic lubrication, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 1961 [Google Scholar]
  19. J.M. Stone, A.F. Underwood, Load carrying capacity of journal bearings, SAE Quarterly Transactions 1 , 56–70 (1947) [Google Scholar]
  20. D. Childs, Turbomachinery rotordynamics, D. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., NY, 1993 [Google Scholar]
  21. ANSYS 2020 release 1, [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.