EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 22 (2021) Mechanics & Industry, 22 (2021) 31 References
Open Access
Issue
Mechanics & Industry
Volume 22, 2021
Article Number 31
Number of page(s) 15
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/meca/2021018
Published online 20 April 2021
  1. K. Manmatha, K. Sukanta, Single phase and two-phase flow through thin and thick orifices in horizontal pipes, Journal of Fluids Engineering 134, 091301-1-14 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Wu, A. Wan, Flows through energy dissipaters with sudden reduction and sudden enlargment forms, Journal of Hydrodynamics 22, 360–365 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  3. M.G. De Giorgi, D. Fontanarosa, A. Ficarella, Characterization of cavitating flow regimes in an internal sharp-edged orifice by means of Proper Orthogonal Decomposition, Journal of Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 9, 242–256 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Testud, P. Moussou, A. Hirschberg, Y. Aurégan, Noise generated by cavitating single-hole and multi-hole orifices in a water pipe, Journal of Fluids and Structures 23, 163–189 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  5. Z. Zhang, J. Cai, Compromise orifice geometery to minimize pressure drop, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 125, 1150–1153 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Reader-Harris, N. Barton, D. Hodges, The effect of contaminated orifice plates on the discharge coefficient, Journal of Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 25, 2–7 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Ramamurthi, S.R. Patnaik, Influence of periodic disturbances on inception of cavitation in sharp-edged orifices, Journal of Experiments in Fluids 33, 720–727 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  8. K. Kowalski, S. Pollak, R. Skoda, J. Hussong, Experimental study on cavitation induced air release in orifice flows, Journal of Fluids Engineering, 140, 061201-1-7 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  9. W. Ai, T. Ding, Orifice plate cavitation mechanism and its influencing factors, Water Science and Engineering 3, 321–330 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  10. W. Ai, J. Wang, Minimum wall pressure coefficient of orifice plate energy dissipater, Water Science and Engineering 8, 85–88 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  11. T. Ding, Y. Wang, Comparison research on hydraulic characteristics of three type's orifice plate, The Open Fuels & Energy Science 8, 43–46 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  12. W. Jianhua, A. Wanzheng, Z. Qi, Head loss coefficient of orifice plate energy dissipato. Journal of Hydraulic Research 48, 526–530 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  13. T. Zhao, J. Zhang, L. Ma, A general structural design methodology for multi-hole orifices and its experimental application, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 25, 2237–2246 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  14. J.P. Tullis, Hydraulics of pipelines. Pumps, valves, cavitation, transients, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1989 [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Maynes, G.J. Holt, J. Blotter, Cavitation inception and head loss due to liquid flow through perforated plates of varying thicknes, Journal of Fluids Engineering 135, 031302-1-11 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. G. Ferrarese, G.V. Messa, M. Rossi, S. Malavasi, New method for predicting the incipient cavitation index by means of single-phase computational fluid dynamics model, Journal of Advances in Mechanical Engineering 7, 1–11 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  17. J.P. Tullis, Cavitation Guide for Control Valve. NRC Publication NUREG/CR-6031, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. (1993) [Google Scholar]
  18. Considerations for evaluating control valve cavitation. Report no. ISA-RP75.23-1995, Durham, NC: Research Triangle Park, (1995). http://webdelprofesor.ula.ve/ingenieria/oscaror/CursosDictados/web%20instrumentaion%20industrial/3%20desarrollo%20de%20proyectos/normas%20ISA/STANDARD/RP_7523.PDF [Google Scholar]
  19. Industrial-process control valves (CEI IEC 60534-8-2), 2nd ed., Bureau central de la Commission Electrotechnique Internationale, Geneva, 2005 [Google Scholar]
  20. M.R. Chowdhury, Determination of pressure loss and discharge coefficients for non-Newtonian fluids in long square edged orifices, Master of Technology Dissertation, Department of Chemical Engineering, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, 2010 [Google Scholar]
  21. N. He, Z. Zao, Theoretical and numerical study of hydraulic characteristics of orifice energy dissipator, Water Science and Engineering 3, 190–199 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  22. W. Zheng, Z. Qi, Hydraulic characteristics of multi-stage orifice plate, Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University 19, 361–366 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  23. P. Testud, Noise generated by cavitating single-hole and multi-hole orifices in a water pipe. Journal of Fluids and Structures 23, 163–189 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Fossa, G. Guglielmini, Pressure drop and void fraction profiles during horizontal flow through thin and thick orifices, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 26, 513–523 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  25. Y. Yan, R.B. Thorpe, Flow regime transitions due to cavitation in the flow through an orifice, International Journal of Multiphase Flow 16, 1023–1045 (1990) [Google Scholar]
  26. Z. Zhang, J. Cai, Compromise orifice geometry to minimize pressure drop, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 125, 1150–1153 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Wu, A. Wanzheng, Head loss coefficient of orifice plate energy dissipator, Journal of Hydraulic Research 48, 526–530 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  28. K. Takahashi, H. Matsua, Cavitation charactericstics of restriction orifices, Proceedings of 4th International Symposium on Cavitation, CAV2001: sessionA9.006 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  29. W. Ai, Energy dissipation characteristics of sharp-edged orifice plate, Advances in Mechanical Engineering 7, 1–6 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. P. Rudolf, D. Kubina, J. Kozák, M. Hudec, F. Pochylý, Dynamics of the cavitating flow downstream of the orifice plate, AIP Conference Proceedings 1889, 020033 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  31. A. Simpson, V. Ranade, Modelling of hydrodynamic cavitation with orifice: influence of different orifice designs, Journal of Chemical Engineering Research and Design 136, 698–711 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  32. C.R. Mali, A.W. Patwardhan, G.K. Pandey, I. Banerjee, V. Vinod, CFD study on the effect of various geometrical parameters of honeycomb type orifices on pressure drop and cavitation characteristics, Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Design 370, 110880 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  33. ISO 5167, Measurement of fluid flow by means of pressure differential devices inserted in circular cross-section conduits running full Part 1: General principles and requirements, 2003 [Google Scholar]
  34. G.G. Dastane, H. Thakkar, R. Shah, S. Perala, J. Raut, A.B. Pandit, Single and multiphase CFD simulations for designing cavitating venturi, Journal of Chemical Engineering Research and Design 149, 1–12 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  35. J. Bardina, P. Huang, T. Coakley, J. Bardina, P. Huang, T. Coakley, Turbulence modeling validation, in: 28th Fluid Dynamics Conference, California (1997) [Google Scholar]
  36. F. Menter, Zonal two equation k-w turbulence models for aerodynamic flows, 23rd Fluid Dynamics, Plasma dynamics and Lasers Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1993 [Google Scholar]
  37. A. Simpson, V.V., Ranade, Modelling of Hydrodynamic Cavitation with Orifice: Influence of different orifice designs. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 136, 698-711 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. G.H. Schnerr, J. Sauer, Physical and numerical modeling of unsteady cavitation dynamics, Fourth International Conference on Multiphase Flow, 2001 [Google Scholar]
  39. P.J. Zwart, A.G. Gerber, T. Belamri, A two-phase flow model for predicting cavitation dynamics, Fifth International Conference on Multiphase Flow, Japan, 2004 [Google Scholar]
  40. A.K. Singhal, M.M. Athavale, H. Li, Y. Jiang, Mathematical basis and validation of the full cavitation model, Journal of Fluids Engineering 124, 617–624 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  41. B. Ebrahimi, G. He, Y. Tang, M. Franchek, D. Liu, J. Pickett, F. Springett, D. Franklin, Characterization of high-pressure cavitating flow through a thick orifice plate in a pipe of constant cross section, International Journal of Thermal Science 114, 229–240 (2017) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.