EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 27 (2026) Mechanics & Industry, 27 (2026) 7 References
Open Access
Issue
Mechanics & Industry
Volume 27, 2026
Article Number 7
Number of page(s) 16
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/meca/2026008
Published online 10 March 2026
  1. F. Vicentini, Collaborative robotics: a survey, J. Mech. Des. 143, 040802 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  2. A. De Santis, B. Siciliano, A. De Luca, A. Bicchi, An atlas of physical human–robot interaction, Mech. Mach. Theory 43, 253–270 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Haddadin, A. De Luca, A. Albu-Schaffer, Robot collisions: a survey on detection, isolation, and identification, IEEE Trans. Robot. 33, 1292–1312 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  4. A. De Luca, R. Mattone, Sensorless robot collision detection and hybrid force/motion control, in: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, IEEE, Barcelona, Spain, 2005, pp. 999–1004 [Google Scholar]
  5. S.S. Jujjavarapu, A.H. Memar, M.A. Karami, E.T. Esfahani, Variable stiffness mechanism for suppressing unintended forces in physical human–robot interaction, J. Mech. Robot. 11, 020915 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Yang, G. Peng, L. Cheng, J. Na, Z. Li, Force sensorless admittance control for teleoperation of uncertain robot manipulator using neural networks, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 51, 3282–3292 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  7. L. Peternel, N. Tsagarakis, D. Caldwell, A. Ajoudani, Robot adaptation to human physical fatigue in human–robot co-manipulation, Auton. Robots 42, 1011–1021 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Bamaarouf, F. Paccot, L. Sarry, H. Chanal, Development of a robotic ultrasound system to assist ultrasound examination of pregnant women, IEEE Trans. Med. Robot. Bionics 6, 796–805 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  9. V. Villani, F. Pini, F. Leali, C. Secchi, Survey on human–robot collaboration in industrial settings: safety, intuitive interfaces and applications, Mechatronics 55, 248–266 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  10. L. Villani, J. De Schutter, Force control, in: B. Siciliano, O. Khatib, (Éds.), Springer Handbook of Robotics, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016, pp. 195–220 [Google Scholar]
  11. F. Caccavale, B. Siciliano, L. Villani, Robot impedance control with nondiagonal stiffness, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 44, 1943–1946 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  12. N. Hogan, Impedance control: an approach to manipulation, in: 1984 American Control Conference, IEEE, San Diego, CA, USA, 1984, pp. 304–313 [Google Scholar]
  13. A.-N. Sharkawy, P.N. Koustoumpardis, Human–robot interaction: a review and analysis on variable admittance control, safety, and perspectives, Machines, 10, 591 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Scibilia, M. Laghi, E. De Momi, L. Peternel, A. Ajoudani, A self-adaptive robot control framework for improved tracking and interaction performances in low-stiffness teleoperation, in: 2018 IEEE-RAS 18th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), IEEE, Beijing, China, 2018, pp. 280–283 [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Gopinathan, S.K. Ötting, J.J. Steil, A user study on personalized stiffness control and task specificity in physical human–robot interaction, Front. Robot. AI 4, 58 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  16. L. Peternel, N. Tsagarakis, A. Ajoudani, Towards multi-modal intention interfaces for human–robot co-manipulation, IEEE Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst., 2016, 2663–2669 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  17. P. Maurice, Y. Measson, V. Padois, P. Bidaud, Assessment of physical exposure to musculoskeletal risks in collaborative robotics using dynamic simulation, in: V. Padois, P. Bidaud, O. Khatib, (Eds.), Romansy 19 – Robot Design, Dynamics and Control. CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, vol. 544., Springer, Vienna, 2013, pp. 325–332 [Google Scholar]
  18. D. Kushida, M. Nakamura, S. Goto, N. Kyura, Human direct teaching of industrial articulated robot arms based on force-free control, Artif. Life Robot. 5, 26–32 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Jlassi, S. Tliba, Y. Chitour, An event-controlled online trajectory generator based on the human–robot interaction force processing, Ind. Robot Int. J. 41, 15–25 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Bahloul, Sur la commande des robots manipulateurs industriels en co-manipulation robotique, Université Paris-Saclay, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Zhang, S. Wang, F. Jing, M. Tan, A sensorless hand guiding scheme based on model identification and control for industrial robot, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., 15, 5204–5213 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  22. S.-D. Lee, K.-H. Ahn, J.-B. Song, Torque control based sensorless hand guiding for direct robot teaching, in: 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), IEEE, Daejeon, South Korea, 2016 [Google Scholar]
  23. H. Sang, J. Yun, R. Monfaredi, E. Wilson, H. Fooladi, K. Cleary, External force estimation and implementation in robotically assisted minimally invasive surgery, Int. J. Med. Robot., 13, e1824 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Winkler, J. Suchý, Force-guided motions of a 6-d.o.f. industrial robot with a joint space approach, Adv. Robot. 20, 1067–1084 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  25. D. Kubus, T. Kroger, F.M. Wahl, Improving force control performance by computational elimination of non-contact forces/torques, in: 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, IEEE, Pasadena, CA, USA, 2008, pp. 2617–2622 [Google Scholar]
  26. E. Mariotti, E. Magrini, A.D. Luca, Admittance control for human–robot interaction using an industrial robot equipped with a F/T Sensor, in: 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2019, pp. 6130–6136 [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Milstein, T. Ganel, S. Berman, I. Nisky, human-centered transparency of grasping via a robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery system, IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst. 48, 349–358 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  28. N. Jarrasse et al., A methodology to quantify alterations in human upper limb movement during co-manipulation with an exoskeleton, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 18, 389–397 (2010) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.