EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 27 (2026) Mechanics & Industry, 27 (2026) 26 References
Issue
Mechanics & Industry
Volume 27, 2026
A French vision of advances and prospects in mechanics: industry, research and training needs
Article Number 26
Number of page(s) 41
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/meca/2026022
Published online 11 June 2026
  1. J.A. Lee, M. Verleysen, Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction, Springer, New York, 2007 [Google Scholar]
  2. T. Roweis, L.K. Saul, Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding, Science 290, 2323–2326 (2000) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. L. Maaten, G. Hinton, Visualizing data using t-SNE, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 2579–2605 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  4. I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, A. Courville, Deep learning, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2016 [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Schmidhuber, Deep learning in neural networks: An overview, Neural Netw. 61, 85–117 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. G.E. Hinton, R.S. Zemel, Autoencoders, minimum description length and helmholtz free energy, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 6 (nisp 1993), Morgan Kaufmann, 1994, pp. 3–10 [Google Scholar]
  7. D.P. Kingma, M. Welling, An introduction to variational autoencoders, Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 12, 307–392 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Makhzani, B. Frey, K-sparse autoencoders. arXiv preprint, arXiv:1312.5663 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  9. J. MacQueen, Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations, in: Proceedings of 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, University of California Press, 1967, pp. 281–297 [Google Scholar]
  10. D. MacKay, An example inference task: clustering, in: Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms, Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 284–292 [Google Scholar]
  11. N. Cristianini, J. Shawe-Taylor, An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-Based Learning Methods, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2000 [Google Scholar]
  12. L. Breiman, J. Friedman, R.A. Olshen, C.J. Stone, Classification and Regression Trees, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  13. L. Breiman, Random forests, Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  14. M.O. Williams, I.G. Kevrekidis, C.W. Rowley, A data-driven approximation of the Koopman operator: extending dynamic mode decomposition, J. Nonlinear Sci. 25, 1307–1346 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  15. S.L. Brunton, B.W. Brunton, J.L. Proctor, E. Kaiser, J.N. Kutz, Chaos as an intermittently forced linear system, Nat. Commun. 8, 19 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  16. G. Carlsson, Topology and data, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 46, 2009 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  17. S.S.Y. Oudot, Persistence theory: from quiver representation to data analysis, in: Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, American Mathematical Society, 2010, pp. 209 [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Yun, C. Argerich, E. Cueto, J.L. Duval, F. Chinesta, Nonlinear regression operating on microstructures described from topological data analysis for the real-time prediction of effective properties, Materials 13, 2335 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  19. T. Frahi, M. Yun, C. Argerich, A. Falco, F. Chinesta, Tape surfaces characterization with persistence images, AIMS Mater. Sci. 7, 364–380 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  20. T. Frahi, F. Chinesta, A. Falco, A. Badias, E. Cueto, H.Y. Choi, M. Han, J.L. Duval, Empowering advanced driver-assistance systems from topological data analysis, Mathematics 9, 634 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  21. T. Frahi, A. Falco, B. Vinh Mau, J.L. Duval, F. Chinesta, Empowering advanced parametric modes clustering from topological data analysis, Appl. Sci. 11, 6554 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Torquato, Statistical description of microstructures, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 32, 77–111 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Ibanez, E. Abisset-Chavanne, E. Cueto, A. Ammar, J.L. Duval, F. Chinesta, Some applications of compressed sensing in computational mechanics: model order reduction, manifold learning, data-driven applications and nonlinear dimensionality reduction, Comput. Mech. 64, 1259–1271 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  24. I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, Y. Bengio, Generative adversarial nets, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 27 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  25. D.P. Kingma, M. Welling, Auto-encoding variational bayes, in: International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2014 [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Kullback, R.A. Leibler, On information and sufficiency, Ann. Math. Stat. 22, 79–86 (1951) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Mounayer, S. Rodriguez, C. Ghnatios, C. Farhat, F. Chinesta, Rank reduction autoencoders. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2405.13980v1 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  28. F. Chinesta, P. Ladeveze, E. Cueto, A short review in model order reduction based on proper generalized decomposition, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 18, 395–404 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  29. F. Chinesta, A. Leygue, F. Bordeu, J.V. Aguado, E. Cueto, D. Gonzalez, I. Alfaro, A. Ammar, A. Huerta, Parametric PGD based computational vademecum for efficient design, optimization and control, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 20, 31–59 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  30. F. Chinesta, R. Keunings, A. Leygue, The Proper Generalized Decomposition for Advanced Numerical Simulations: a Primer, SpringerBriefs, Springer, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  31. F. Chinesta, A. Huerta, G. Rozza, K. Willcox, Model order reduction, in: The Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics. Erwin Stein, Rene de Borst, 2nd edn, Tom Hughes Edt., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  32. D. Borzacchiello, J.V. Aguado, F. Chinesta, Non-intrusive sparse subspace learning for parametrized problems, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 26, 303–326 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  33. R. Ibanez, E. Abisset-Chavanne, A. Ammar, D. Gonzalez, E. Cueto, A. Huerta, J. L. Duval, F. Chinesta, A multi-dimensional data-driven sparse identification technique: the sparse proper generalized decomposition, Complexity 5608286 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  34. S.L. Brunton, J.L. Proctor, J.N. Kutz, Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 3932–3937 (2016) [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. A. Sancarlos, V. Champaney, J.L. Duval, E. Cueto, F. Chinesta, PGD-based advanced nonlinear multiparametric regressions for constructing metamodels at the scarce-data limit. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2103.05358 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  36. K. Tang, P.M. Congedo, R. Abgrall, Sensitivity analysis using anchored anova expansion and high order moments computation [Research Report], RR-8531, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  37. M. Kubicek, E. Minisci, M. Cisternino, High dimensional sensitivity analysis using surrogate modeling and high dimensional model representation, Int. J. Uncertain. Quantif. 5, 393–414 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  38. M. Nielsen. Neural networks and deep learning. http://neuralnetworksanddeeplearning.com/chap4.html, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  39. T. Chen, H. Chen, Approximations of continuous functionals by neural networks with application to dynamic systems, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 4, 910–918 (1993) [Google Scholar]
  40. T. Chen, H. Chen, Universal approximation to nonlinear operators by neural networks with arbitrary activation functions and its application to dynamical systems, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 6, 911–917 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  41. R. Venkatesan, B. Li, Convolutional Neural Networks in Visual Computing: A Concise Guide, CRC Press, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  42. S. Roux, F. Hild, Optimal procedure for the identification of constitutive parameters from experimentally measured displacement fields, Int. J. Solids Struct. 184, 14–23 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  43. P.J. Schmid, Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data, J. Fluid Mech. 656, 528 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  44. A. Sancarlos, J.M. Le Peuvedic, J. Groulier, J.L. Duval, E. Cueto, F. Chinesta, Learning stable reduced-order models for hybrid twins, Data-Centric Eng. 2, e10 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  45. A. Sancarlos, M. Cameron, A. Abel, E. Cueto, J.L. Duval, F. Chinesta, From ROM of electrochemistry to AI-based battery digital and hybrid twin, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 28, 979–1015 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  46. T. Qin, K. Wu, D. Xiu, Data driven governing equations approximation using deep neural networks, J. Comput. Phys. 395, 620–635 (2019) [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  47. S.A. Billings, Nonlinear System Identification: NARMAX Methods in the Time, Frequency and Spatio-Temporal Domains, Wiley, 2013 [Google Scholar]
  48. F. Takens, Detecting strange attractors in turbulence, in: Dynamical Systems and Turbulence, Warwick 1980: Proceedings of a Symposium Held at the University of Warwick 1979/80, Springer, 2006, pp. 366–381 [Google Scholar]
  49. R.T.Q. Chen, Y. Rubanova, J. Bettencourt, D.K. Duvenaud, Neural ordinary differential equations, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 31 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  50. C. Ghnatios, X. Kestelyn, G. Denis, F. Chinesta, Learning data-driven stable corrections of dynamical systems—application to the simulation of the top-oil temperature evolution of a power transformer, Energies 16, 5790 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. M.M. Bronstein, J. Bruna, T. Cohen, P. Veličković, Geometric deep learning: grids, groups, graphs, geodesics, and gauges. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2104.13478 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  52. P.W. Battaglia, J.B. Hamrick, V. Bapst, A. Sanchez-Gonzalez, V. Zambaldi, M. Malinowski, A. Tacchetti, D. Raposo, A. Santoro, R. Faulkner, et al., Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networks. arXiv preprint, arXiv:1806.01261 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  53. K. Weiss, T.M. Khoshgoftaar, D.D. Wang, A survey of transfer learning, J. Big Data 3, 9 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. A.G. Baydin, B.A. Pearlmutter, A.A. Radul, J.M. Siskind, Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 18, 1–43 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  55. M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, G.E. Karniadakis, Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations, J. Comput. Phys. 378, 686–707 (2019) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. L. Lu, P. Jin, G.E. Karniadakis, DeepONet: learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operators. arXiv preprint, arXiv:1910.03193 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  57. D. González, F. Chinesta, E. Cueto, Thermodynamically consistent data-driven computational mechanics, Continuum Mech. Thermodyn. 31, 239–253 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  58. S. Greydanus, M. Dzamba, J. Yosinski, Hamiltonian neural networks, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 32 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  59. T. Bertalan, F. Dietrich, I. Mezić, I.G. Kevrekidis, On learning hamiltonian systems from data, Chaos 29 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  60. Q. Hernandez, A. Badias, D. Gonzalez, F. Chinesta, E. Cueto, Deep learning of thermodynamics-aware reduced-order models from data, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 379, 113763 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  61. D. González, F. Chinesta, E. Cueto, Learning non-Markovian physics from data, J. Comput. Phys. 428, 109982 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  62. F. Masi, I. Stefanou, P. Vannucci, L. Stainier, Thermodynamics-based learning of hyperelastic constitutive models, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 147, 104277 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. Z. Zhang, Y. Shin, G.E. Karniadakis, GFINNs: Generic formalism informed neural networks for deterministic and stochastic dynamical systems, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 380, 20210207 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  64. K. Lee, N. Trask, P. Stinis, Machine learning structure preserving brackets for forecasting irreversible processes, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 34, 5696–5707 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  65. M. Vermeeren, A. Bravetti, M. Seri, Contact variational integrators, J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 52, 445206 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  66. S. Huang, Z. He, C. Reina, Variational Onsager neural networks (VONNs): a thermodynamics-based variational learning strategy for non-equilibrium PDEs, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 163, 104856 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  67. F. Chinesta, E. Cueto, E. Abisset-Chavanne, J.L. Duval, F. El Khaldi, Virtual, digital and hybrid twins: a new paradigm in data-based engineering and engineered data, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 27, 105–134 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  68. B. Moya, A. Badías, Í. Alfaro, F. Chinesta, E. Cueto, Digital twins that learn and correct themselves, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 123, 3034–3044 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  69. C.A. Martín, A. C. Méndez, O. Sainges, E. Petiot, A. Barasinski, M. Piana, L. Ratier, F. Chinesta, Empowering design based on hybrid twin: application to acoustic resonators, Designs 4, 44 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  70. F. Chinesta, E. Cueto, V. Champaney, C. Ghnatios, A. Ammar, N. Hascoet, D. Gonzalez, I. Alfaro, D. Di Lorenzo, A. Pasquale, D. Baillargeat, A Gentle Short Introduction on Data, Learning, Model Order Reduction and Twining Methodologies and Techniques, Springer Nature, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  71. Y. Wang, K. Shimada, A.B. Farimani, Airfoil GAN: Encoding and synthesizing airfoils for aerodynamic shape optimization, J. Comput. Des. Eng. 10, 1350–1362 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  72. A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A.N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, I. Polosukhin, Attention is all you need, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 30, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  73. A. Tierz, J. Mounayer, B. Moya, F. Chinesta, Variational rank reduction autoencoders for generative thermal design, Results Eng. 108418 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  74. F. Chinesta, E. Cueto, Empowering engineering with data, machine learning and artificial intelligence: a short introductive review, Adv. Model. Simul. Eng. Sci. 9, 21 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  75. B.K. Bay, T.S. Smith, D.P. Fyhrie, M. Saad, Digital volume correlation: three-dimensional strain mapping using x-ray tomography, Exp. Mech. 39, 217–226 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  76. A. Buljac, C. Jailin, A. Mendoza, J. Neggers, T. Taillandier-Thomas, A. Bouterf, B. Smaniotto, F. Hild, S. Roux, Digital volume correlation: review of progress and challenges, Exp. Mech. 58, 661–708 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  77. F. Hild, S. Roux, On the future of experimental mechanics in the digital world: an eikological perspective, Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids 113, 105654 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  78. J.-Y. Buffière, E. Maire, J. Adrien, J.-P. Masse, E. Boller, In situ experiments with x ray tomography: an attractive tool for experimental mechanics, Exp. Mech. 50, 289–305 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  79. L. Herrmann, S. Kollmannsberger, Deep learning in computational mechanics: a review, Comput. Mech. 74, 281–331 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  80. D. Jeulin, Morphological Models of Random Structures, Springer, 2021 [Google Scholar]
  81. G. Fourrier, A. Rassineux, F.-H. Leroy, M. Hirsekorn, C. Fagiano, E. Baranger, Automated conformal mesh generation chain for woven composites based on ct-scan images with low contrasts, Compos. Struct. 308, 116673 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  82. E.A. Holm, R. Cohn, N. Gao, A.R. Kitahara, T.P. Matson, B. Lei, S.R. Yarasi, Overview: computer vision and machine learning for microstructural characterization and analysis, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 51, 5985–5999 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  83. O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, T. Brox, U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, in: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer, 2015, pp. 234–241 [Google Scholar]
  84. F. Xing, Y. Xie, H. Su, F. Liu, L. Yang, Deep learning in microscopy image analysis: a survey, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 29, 4550–4568 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  85. A.M. Hilmas, C. Przybyla, M. Schey, Developing automated characterization techniques to quantify 3D datasets for ceramic matrix composite materials, MRS Commun. 14, 876–887 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  86. M. Nicol, F. Laurin, M. Hirsekorn, M. Kaminski, S. Feld-Payet, P. Paulmier, W. Albouy, Automated crack detection in laminated composites by optical flow measurements, Compos. Part B Eng. 255, 110599 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  87. A. Mendoza, R. Trullo, Y. Wielhorski, Descriptive modeling of textiles using FE simulations and deep learning, Compos. Sci. Technol. 213, 108897 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  88. A.K. Matpadi Raghavendra, L. Lacourt, L. Marcin, V. Maurel, H. Proudhon, Generation of synthetic microstructures containing casting defects: A machine learning approach, Sci. Rep. 13, 11852 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  89. S. Boukhtache, K. Abdelouahab, F. Berry, B. Blaysat, M. Grédiac, F. Sur, When deep learning meets digital image correlation, Opt. Lasers Eng. 136, 106308 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  90. R. Yang, Y. Li, D. Zeng, P. Guo, Deep DIC: Deep learning-based digital image correlation for end-to-end displacement and strain measurement, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 302, 117474 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  91. L. Himanen, A. Geurts, A.S. Foster, P. Rinke, Data-driven materials science: status, challenges, and perspectives, Adv. Sci. 6, 1900808 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  92. P. Xu, X. Ji, M. Li, W. Lu, Small data machine learning in materials science, npj Comput. Mater. 9, 42 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  93. X. Zhong, B. Gallagher, S. Liu, B. Kailkhura, A. Hiszpanski, T.Y.-J. Han, Explainable machine learning in materials science, npj Comput. Mater. 8, 204 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  94. C.-T. Chen, G.X. Gu, Learning hidden elasticity with deep neural networks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2102721118 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  95. C.-T. Chen, G.X. Gu, Physics-informed deep-learning for elasticity: forward, inverse, and mixed problems, Adv. Sci. 10, 2300439 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  96. H. Dong, L. Wang, Q. Chen, Physics-informed neural networks for elastography, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 382, 113891 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  97. Y.K. Mariappan, K.J. Glaser, R.L. Ehman, Magnetic resonance elastography: a review, Clin. Anat. 23, 497–511 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  98. H. Li, M. Bhatt, Z. Qu, S. Zhang, M.C. Hartel, A. Khademhosseini, G. Cloutier, Deep learning in ultrasound elastography imaging: a review, Med. Phys. 49, 5993–6018 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  99. R. Bouclier, R. Bonnet-Eymard, E. Rabineau, J. Réthoré, Pinn-based identification of spatially varying elastic moduli from experimental full-field displacement data, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 455, 118874 (2026) [Google Scholar]
  100. F.E. Bock, R.C. Aydin, C.J. Cyron, N. Huber, S.R. Kalidindi, B. Klusemann, A review of the application of machine learning and data mining approaches in continuum materials mechanics, Front. Mater. 6, 110 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  101. H. Jin, E. Zhang, H.D. Espinosa, Recent advances and applications of machine learning in experimental solid mechanics: a review, Appl. Mech. Rev. 75, 061001 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  102. J. Ghaboussi, J.H. Garrett Jr, X. Wu, Knowledge-based modeling of material behavior with neural networks, J. Eng. Mech. 117, 132–153 (1991) [Google Scholar]
  103. A. Sherstinsky, Fundamentals of recurrent neural network (RNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) network, Physica D 404, 132306 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  104. S. Nosouhian, F. Nosouhian, A.K. Khoshouei, A review of recurrent neural network architecture for sequence learning: comparison between LSTM and GRU, Appl. Sci. 11, 1528 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  105. L. Alzubaidi et al., Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions, J. Big Data 8, 1–74 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  106. J. Zhou, G. Cui, S. Hu, Z. Zhang, C. Yang, Z. Liu, L. Wang, C. Li, M. Sun, Graph neural networks: a review of methods and applications, AI Open 1, 57–81 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  107. M. Mozaffar, R. Bostanabad, W. Chen, K. Ehmann, J. Cao, Deep learning predicts path-dependent plasticity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 26414–26420 (2019) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. D.W. Abueidda, S. Koric, N.A. Sobh, Deep learning for plasticity and thermoviscoplasticity, Int. J. Plast. 136, 102852 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  109. M.H. Gorji, M. Mozaffar, L. Nguyen, M.A. Bessa, Recurrent neural networks for path-dependent plasticity, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 143, 103972 (2020) [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  110. C. Bonatti, D. Mohr, From crystal plasticity finite-element simulations to recurrent neural networks: data-driven constitutive models for rate-dependent polycrystals, Int. J. Plast. 152, 103430 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  111. Z. Liu, Y. Mo, S. Keten, W. Chen, W.K. Liu, A deep material network for multiscale topology learning and accelerated nonlinear modeling of heterogeneous materials, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 345, 1138–1168 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  112. X. Lu, Y. Liu, C.T. Wu, A neural network based computational homogenization method for nonlinear anisotropic composites, Comput. Mech. 64, 307–321 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  113. T. Kirchdoerfer, M. Ortiz, Data-driven computational mechanics, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 304, 81–101 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  114. R. Ibañez, D. Borzacchiello, J.V. Aguado, E. Abisset-Chavanne, E. Cueto, P. Ladeveze, F. Chinesta, Data-driven non-linear elasticity: constitutive manifold construction and problem discretization, Comput. Mech. 60, 813–826 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  115. P. Carrara, M. Ortiz, L. De Lorenzis, Model-free fracture mechanics and fatigue, in: Current Trends and Open Problems in Computational Mechanics, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022, pp. 75–82. [Google Scholar]
  116. L. Costecalde, A. Leygue, M. Coret, E. Verron, Data-driven identification of hyperelastic models by measuring the strain energy density field, Rubber Chem. Technol. 96, 443–454 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  117. X. He, Q. He, J.-S. Chen, U. Sinha, S. Sinha, Physics-constrained local convexity data-driven modeling of anisotropic nonlinear elastic solids, Data-Centric Eng. 1, e4 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  118. B. Bahmani, W.C. Sun, Manifold embedding data-driven mechanics, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 166, 104927 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  119. J.N. Fuhg, G.A. Padmanabha, N. Bouklas, B. Bahmani, W. Sun, N.N. Vlassis, M. Flaschel, P. Carrara, L. De Lorenzis, A review on data-driven constitutive laws for solids, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., 1–43 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  120. A. Hussain, A.H. Sakhaei, M. Shafiee, Machine learning-based constitutive modelling for material non-linearity: a review, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 1–19 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  121. D.W. Abueidda, S. Koric, E. Guleryuz, N.A. Sobh, Enhanced physics-informed neural networks for hyperelasticity, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 124, 1585–1601 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  122. A. Danoun, E. Prulière, Y. Chemisky, Thermodynamically consistent recurrent neural networks to predict non linear behaviors of dissipative materials subjected to non-proportional loading paths, Mech. Mater. 173, 104436 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  123. F. Masi, I. Stefanou, P. Vannucci, V. Maffi-Berthier, Thermodynamics-based artificial neural networks for constitutive modeling, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 147, 104277 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  124. F. Masi, I. Stefanou, Evolution TANN and the identification of internal variables and evolution equations in solid mechanics, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 174, 105245 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  125. M. Fernández, M. Jamshidian, T. Böhlke, K. Kersting, O. Weeger, Anisotropic hyperelastic constitutive models for finite deformations combining material theory and data-driven approaches with application to cubic lattice metamaterials, Comput. Mech. 67, 653–677 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  126. D.K. Klein, M. Fernández, R.J. Martin, P. Neff, O. Weeger, Polyconvex anisotropic hyperelasticity with neural networks, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 159, 104703 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  127. F. As’ad, P. Avery, C. Farhat, A mechanics-informed artificial neural network approach in data-driven constitutive modeling, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 123, 2738–2759 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  128. L. Linden, D.K. Klein, K.A. Kalina, J. Brummund, O. Weeger, M. Kästner, Neural networks meet hyperelasticity: a guide to enforcing physics, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 105363 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  129. K. Linka, E. Kuhl, A new family of Constitutive Artificial Neural Networks towards automated model discovery, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 403, 115731 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  130. B. Amos, L. Xu, J.Z. Kolter, Input convex neural networks, Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. 146–155 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  131. S.H. Rudy, S.L. Brunton, J.L. Proctor, J.N. Kutz, Data-driven discovery of partial differential equations, Sci. Adv. 3, e1602614 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  132. P. Thakolkaran, Y. Guo, S. Saini, M. Peirlinck, B. Alheit, S. Kumar, Can KAN CANS? Input-convex Kolmogorov-Arnold networks (KANs) as hyperelastic constitutive artificial neural networks (CANNs), Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 443, 118089 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  133. G.A. Maugin, R. Drouot, F. Sidoroff (Eds.), Continuum Thermomechanics: The Art and Science of Modelling Material Behaviour, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002 [Google Scholar]
  134. D.Z. Huang, K. Xu, C. Farhat, E. Darve, Learning constitutive relations from indirect observations using deep neural networks, J. Comput. Phys. 416, 109491 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  135. M. Flaschel, S. Kumar, L. De Lorenzis, Unsupervised discovery of interpretable hyperelastic constitutive laws, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 381, 113852 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  136. M. Flaschel, H. Yu, N. Reiter, J. Hinrichsen, S. Budday, P. Steinmann, S. Kumar, L. De Lorenzis, Automated discovery of interpretable hyperelastic material models for human brain tissue with EUCLID, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 180, 105404 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  137. P. Thakolkaran, A. Joshi, Y. Zheng, M. Flaschel, L. De Lorenzis, S. Kumar, NN-EUCLID: Deep-learning hyperelasticity without stress data, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 169, 105076 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  138. A. Benady, E. Baranger, L. Chamoin, Unsupervised learning of history-dependent constitutive material laws with thermodynamically-consistent neural networks in the modified Constitutive Relation Error framework, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 425, 116967, (2024) [Google Scholar]
  139. L. Li, C.Q. Chen, Equilibrium-based convolution neural networks for constitutive modeling of hyperelastic materials, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 164, 104931 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  140. D. Claire, F. Hild, S. Roux, A finite element formulation to identify damage fields: the equilibrium gap method, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 61, 189–208 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  141. S. Meng, A.A.K. Yousefi, S. Avril, Machine-learning-based virtual fields method: Application to anisotropic hyperelasticity, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 434, 117580 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  142. R. Shi, H. Yang, J. Chen, K. Hackl, S. Avril, Y. He, Deep learning without stress data on the discovery of multi-regional hyperelastic properties, Comput. Mech. 1–30 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  143. C. Jailin, S. Roux, A. Benady, E. Baranger, Noise-bias compensation for the unsupervised learning of constitutive laws, C.R. Mécanique 354, 1–24 (2026) [Google Scholar]
  144. F. Regazzoni, The internal law of a material can be discovered from its boundary. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2603.26517 (2026) [Google Scholar]
  145. A. Joshi, P. Thakolkaran, Y. Zheng, M. Escande, M. Flaschel, L. De Lorenzis, S. Kumar, Bayesian-EUCLID: discovering hyperelastic material laws with uncertainties, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 398, 115225 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  146. G.E. Karniadakis, I.G. Kevrekidis, L. Lu, P. Perdikaris, S. Wang, L. Yang, Physics-informed machine learning, Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 422–440 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  147. M. Bourdyot, M. Compans, R. Langlois, B. Smaniotto, E. Baranger, C. Jailin, Learning a hyperelastic constitutive model from 3d experimental data, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 450, 118592 (2026) [Google Scholar]
  148. C. Jailin, A. Benady, R. Legroux, E. Baranger, Experimental learning of a hyperelastic behavior with a physics-augmented neural network, Exp. Mech. 1–17 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  149. A. Ammar, B. Mokdad, F. Chinesta, R. Keunings, A new family of solvers for multidimensional PDEs in kinetic theory of complex fluids, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 139, 153–176 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  150. F. Chinesta, P. Ladevèze, Separated representations and PGD-based model reduction: fundamentals and applications, Int. Cent. Mech. Sci. Courses Lect. 554, 24 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  151. L. Lu, X. Meng, Z. Mao, G.E. Karniadakis, DeepXDE: a deep learning library for solving differential equations, SIAM Rev. 63, 208–228 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  152. S. Cai, Z. Mao, Z. Wang, M. Yin, G.E. Karniadakis, Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: a review, Acta Mech. Sin. 37, 1727–1738 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  153. J.-H. Bastek, W. Sun, D.M. Kochmann, Physics-informed diffusion models. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2403.14404 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  154. S. Cheng, C. Quilodrán-Casas, S. Ouala, A. Farchi, C. Liu, P. Tandeo, R. Fablet, D. Lucor, B. Iooss, J. Brajard, et al., Machine learning with data assimilation and uncertainty quantification for dynamical systems: a review, IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin. 1 [Google Scholar]
  155. Y. Zhao, H. Li, H. Zhou, H.R. Attar, T. Pfaff, N. Li, A review of graph neural network applications in mechanics-related domains, Artif. Intell. Rev. 57, 315 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  156. Y. Heider, K. Wang, W. Sun, SO(3)-invariance of informed-graph-based deep neural network for anisotropic elastoplastic materials, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 363, 112875 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  157. J.-M. Hestroffer, M.-A. Charpagne, M.I. Latypov, I.J. Beyerlein, Graph neural networks for efficient learning of mechanical properties of polycrystals, Comput. Mater. Sci. 217, 111894 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  158. Z. Li, N. Kovachki, K. Azizzadenesheli, B. Liu, K. Bhattacharya, A. Stuart, A. Anandkumar, Fourier neural operator for parametric partial differential equations. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2010.08895 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  159. N.B. Kovachki, Z. Li, B. Liu, K. Azizzadenesheli, K. Bhattacharya, A. Stuart, A. Anandkumar, Neural operator: learning maps between function spaces. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2108.08481 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  160. F. Lehmann, F. Gatti, M. Bertin, D. Clouteau, 3D elastic wave propagation with a factorized Fourier neural operator (F-FNO), Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 420, 116718 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  161. S. Goswami, A. Bora, Y. Yu, G.E. Karniadakis, Physics-informed deep neural operators for learning parametric PDEs. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2207.05748 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  162. Y. Cao, L. Lu, X. Meng, Z. Mao, G.E. Karniadakis, Geom-DeepONet: physics-informed geometry-adaptive operator learning for parametric PDEs on irregular domains. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2303.03154 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  163. T.N. Nguyen, J. Lee, L. Dinh-Tien, L.M. Dang, Deep learned one-iteration nonlinear solver for solid mechanics, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 123, 1841–1860 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  164. J. Aghili, E. Franck, R. Hild, V. Michel-Dansac, V. Vigon, Accelerating the convergence of Newton’s method for nonlinear elliptic PDEs using Fourier neural operators, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 140, 108434 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  165. F. Feyel, J.-L. Chaboche, Fe2 multiscale approach for modelling the elastoviscoplastic behaviour of long fibre sic/ti composite materials, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 183, 309–330 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  166. B.A. Le, J. Yvonnet, Q.-C. He, Computational homogenization of nonlinear elastic materials using neural networks, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 104, 1061–1084 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  167. F. Masi, I. Stefanou, Multiscale modeling of inelastic materials with thermodynamics-based artificial neural networks (TANN), Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 398, 115190 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  168. F. Aldakheel, E.S. Elsayed, T.I. Zohdi, P. Wriggers, Efficient multiscale modeling of heterogeneous materials using deep neural networks, Comput. Mech. 72, 155–171 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  169. J. Lißner, F. Fritzen, Microstructure homogenization: human vs machine, Adv. Model. Simul. Eng. Sci. 11, 21 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  170. J.P. Stöcker, E.S. Elsayed, F. Aldakheel, M. Kaliske, FE-NN: Efficient-scale transition for heterogeneous microstructures using neural networks, PAMM 23, e202300011 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  171. J. Storm, I.B.C.M. Rocha, F.P. van der Meer, A microstructure-based graph neural network for accelerating multiscale simulations, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 427, 117001 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  172. M.A. Maia, I.B.C.M. Rocha, P. Kerfriden, F.P. van der Meer, Physically recurrent neural networks for path-dependent heterogeneous materials: embedding constitutive models in a data-driven surrogate, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 407, 115934 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  173. S.E. Sekkal, M. El Fallaki Idrissi, F. Meraghni, G. Chatzigeorgiou, F. Chinesta, Multiscale thermodynamics-informed neural networks (MuTINN) for nonlinear structural computations of recycled thermoplastic composites, Compos. Part B Eng. 300, 112455 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  174. M. Mirkhalaf, I. Rocha, Micromechanics-based deep-learning for composites: Challenges and future perspectives, Eur. J. Mech. A Solids 105, 105242 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  175. Y. Liu, K.P. Kelley, R.K. Vasudevan, H. Funakubo, M.A. Ziatdinov, S.V. Kalinin, Experimental discovery of structure–property relationships in ferroelectric materials via active learning, Nat. Mach. Intell. 4, 341–350 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  176. V. Matray, F. Amlani, F. Feyel, D. Néron, A hybrid numerical methodology coupling reduced order modeling and graph neural networks for non-parametric geometries: Applications to structural dynamics problems, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 430, 117243 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  177. B. Shahriari, K. Swersky, Z. Wang, R.P. Adams, N. De Freitas, Taking the human out of the loop: A review of Bayesian optimization, Proc. IEEE 104, 148–175 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  178. T. Park, E. Kim, J. Sun, M. Kim, E. Hong, K. Min, Rapid discovery of promising materials via active learning with multi-objective optimization, Mater. Today Commun. 37, 107245 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  179. N.K. Brown, A.P. Garland, G.M. Fadel, G. Li, Deep reinforcement learning for engineering design through topology optimization of elementally discretized design domains, Mater. Des. 218, 110672 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  180. L. Regenwetter, A.H. Nobari, F. Ahmed, Deep generative models in engineering design: A review, J. Mech. Des. 144, 071704 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  181. S. Kumar, S. Tan, L. Zheng, D.M. Kochmann, Inverse-designed spinodoid metamaterials, npj Comput. Mater. 6, 73 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  182. N.N. Vlassis, W. Sun, Denoising diffusion algorithm for inverse design of microstructures with fine-tuned nonlinear material properties, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 413, 116126 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  183. Z. Sun, S. Jayasinghe, A. Sidiq, F. Shahrivar, M. Mahmoodian, S. Setunge, Approach towards the development of digital twin for structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure: A comprehensive review, Sensors 25, 59 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  184. T.G. Ritto, F.A. Rochinha, Digital twin, physics-based model, and machine learning applied to damage detection in structures, Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 155, 107614 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  185. M. Torzoni, M. Tezzele, S. Mariani, A. Manzoni, K.E. Willcox, A digital twin framework for civil engineering structures, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 418, 116584 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  186. V. Champaney, F. Chinesta, E. Cueto, Engineering empowered by physics-based and data-driven hybrid models: a methodological overview, Int. J. Mater. Form. 15, 31 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  187. L. Chamoin, E. Baranger, A. Benady, P.-É. Charbonnel, M. Diaz, S. Farahbakhsh, L. Fribourg, D. Martin Xavier, M. Poncelet, A novel DDDAS architecture combining advanced sensing and simulation technologies for effective real-time structural health monitoring (2023) [Google Scholar]
  188. H. Yamada, C. Liu, S. Wu, Y. Koyama, S. Ju, J. Shiomi, J. Morikawa, R. Yoshida, Predicting materials properties with little data using shotgun transfer learning, ACS Cent. Sci. 5, 1717–1730 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  189. Y. Gal, Z. Ghahramani, Dropout as a Bayesian approximation: representing model uncertainty in deep learning, in: International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2016, pp. 1050–1059 [Google Scholar]
  190. L.M. Ghiringhelli, J. Vybiral, S.V. Levchenko, C. Draxl, M. Scheffler, Big data of materials science: critical role of the descriptor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 105503 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  191. F. Gatti, D. Clouteau, Towards blending physics-based numerical simulations and seismic databases using generative adversarial network, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 372, 113421 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  192. J. Wei, Y. Tay, R. Bommasani, C. Raffel, B. Zoph, S. Borgeaud, D. Yogatama, M. Bosma, D. Zhou, D. Metzler, et al., Emergent abilities of large language models. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2206.07682 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  193. C. Lu, C. Lu, R.T. Lange, J. Foerster, J. Clune, D. Ha, The AI scientist: towards fully automated open-ended scientific discovery. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2408.06292 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  194. B. Ni, M.J. Buehler, MechAgents: Large language model multi-agent collaborations can solve mechanics problems, generate new data, and integrate knowledge, Extreme Mech. Lett. 67, 102131 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  195. J. Gottweis, W. Weng, A. Daryin, T. Tu, A. Palepu, P. Sirkovic, A. Myaskovsky, F. Weissenberger, K. Rong, R. Tanno, et al., Towards an AI co-scientist. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2502.18864 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  196. H. Wang, T. Fu, Y. Du, W. Gao, K. Huang, Z. Liu, P. Chandak, S. Liu, P. Van Katwyk, A. Deac, et al., Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence, Nature 620, 47–60 (2023) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. R. Keunings C. Binetruy, F. Chinesta, Flows in Polymers, Reinforced Polymers and Composites. A Multiscale Approach, Springerbriefs, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  198. E. Abisset, F. Chinesta, A Journey Around the Different Scales Involved in the Description of Matter and Complex Systems, SpringerBriefs, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  199. R. Ibañez, F. Casteran, C. Argerich, C. Ghnatios, N. Hascoet, A. Ammar, P. Cassagnau, F. Chinesta, On the data-driven modeling of reactive extrusion, Fluids 5, 94 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  200. F. Castéran, R. Ibanez, C. Argerich, K. Delage, F. Chinesta, P. Cassagnau, Application of machine learning tools for the improvement of reactive extrusion simulation, Macromol. Mater. Eng. 305, 2000375 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  201. C. Ghnatios, E. Gravot, V. Champaney, N. Verdon, N. Hascoët, F. Chinesta, Polymer extrusion die design using a data-driven autoencoders technique, Int. J. Mater. Form. 17, 4 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  202. M. Yun, C.A. Martin, P. Gilormini, F. Chinesta, S. Advani, Learning the macroscopic flow model of short fiber suspensions from fine-scale simulated data, Entropy 22, 30 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  203. M. Tannous, S. Rodriguez, C. Ghnatios, F. Chinesta, Integrating simulation and machine learning for accurate preform charge prediction in sheet molding compound manufacturing, Int. J. Mater. Form. 18, 15 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  204. S. Rodriguez, E. Monteiro, N. Mechbal, M. Rebillat, F. Chinesta, Hybrid twin of RTM process at the scarce data limit, Int. J. Mater. Form. 16, 40 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  205. F. Chinesta, A. Leygue, B. Bognet, C. Ghnatios, F. Poulhaon, F. Bordeu, A. Barasinski, A. Poitou, S. Chatel, S. Maison-Le-Poec, First steps towards an advanced simulation of composites manufacturing by automated tape placement, Int. J. Mater. Form. 7, 81–92 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  206. C. Argerich, R. Ibánez, A. León, E. Abisset-Chavanne, F. Chinesta, Tape surface characterization and classification in automated tape placement processability: modeling and numerical analysis, AIMS Mater. Sci. 5, 870–888 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  207. B. Ferrándiz, M. Palacios, C. Mailhé, A.S. Barasinski, F. Chinesta, Thermal field estimation in cfrtp composites using an attention-enhanced u-net, Int. J. Mater. Form. 18, 76 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  208. T. Loreau, V. Champaney, N. Hascoet, J. Lambarri, M. Madarieta, I. Garmendia, F. Chinesta, Parametric analysis and machine learning-based parametric modeling of wire laser metal deposition induced porosity, Int. J. Mater. Form. 15, 33 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  209. M. Nouri, J. Artozoul, A. Caillaud, A. Ammar, F. Chinesta, O. Köser, Shrinkage porosity prediction empowered by physics-based and data-driven hybrid models, Int. J. Mater. Form. 15, 25 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  210. A. Ammar, M.B. Saada, E. Cueto, F. Chinesta, Casting hybrid twin: physics-based reduced order models enriched with data-driven models enabling the highest accuracy in real-time, Int. J. Mater. Form. 17, 16 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  211. B. Ferrándiz, M. Daoud, N. Kohout, F. Chinesta, Prediction of cross-sectional features of spr joints based on the punch force-displacement curve using machine learning, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 128, 4023–4034 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  212. K. Derouiche, M. Daoud, K. Traidi, F. Chinesta, Real-time prediction by data-driven models applied to induction heating process, Int. J. Mater. Form. 15, 48 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  213. S. Garois, M. Daoud, K. Traidi, F. Chinesta, Artificial intelligence modeling of induction contour hardening of 300M steel bar and C45 steel spur-gear, Int. J. Mater. Form. 16, 26 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  214. M. Raffel, C.E. Willert, F. Scarano, C.J. Kähler, S.T. Wereley, J. Kompenhans, Particle Image Velocimetry: A Practical Guide, Springer, 2018 [Google Scholar]
  215. S.L. Brunton, B.R. Noack, P. Koumoutsakos, Machine learning for fluid mechanics, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 52, 477–508 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  216. D. Kochkov, J.A. Smith, A. Alieva, Q. Wang, M.P. Brenner, S. Hoyer, Machine learning–accelerated computational fluid dynamics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2101784118 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  217. P.J. Schmid, Dynamic mode decomposition and its variants, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 54, 225–254 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  218. M. Milano, P. Koumoutsakos, Neural network modeling for near wall turbulent flow, J. Comput. Phys. 182, 1–26 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  219. L. Agostini, Exploration and prediction of fluid dynamical systems using auto-encoder technology, Phys. Fluids 32 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  220. K. Fukami, K. Taira, Grasping extreme aerodynamics on a low-dimensional manifold, Nat. Commun. 14, 6480 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  221. J. Deng, C. Bi, L. Deng, A masked autoencoder-based three-dimensional foundation model for vortex identification, Phys. Fluids 37 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  222. A. Cremades, S. Hoyas, R. Deshpande, P. Quintero, M. Lellep, W.J. Lee, J.P. Monty, N. Hutchins, M. Linkmann, I. Marusic, et al., Identifying regions of importance in wall-bounded turbulence through explainable deep learning, Nat. Commun. 15, 3864 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  223. S. Hoyas, N. Benedikt, A. Cremades, R. Vinuesa, Deep-learning-based assessment of skin friction in wall-bounded turbulence, Phys. Rev. Fluids 10, L062601 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  224. L. Merrick, A. Taly, The explanation game: explaining machine learning models using shapley values, in: International Cross-Domain Conference for Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, Springer, 2020, 17–38 [Google Scholar]
  225. J. Jiménez, Coherent structures in wall-bounded turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 842, P1 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  226. E. Kaiser, B.R. Noack, L. Cordier, A. Spohn, M. Segond, M. Abel, G. Daviller, J. Östh, S. Krajnović, R.K. Niven, Cluster-based reduced-order modelling of a mixing layer, J. Fluid Mech. 754, 365–414 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  227. E. Saetta, R. Tognaccini, Identification of flowfield regions by machine learning, AIAA J. 61, 1503–1518 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  228. S. Roweis, Z. Ghahramani, A unifying review of linear Gaussian models, Neural Comput. 11, 305–345 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  229. J.L. Callaham, J.V. Koch, B.W. Brunton, J.N. Kutz, S.L. Brunton, Learning dominant physical processes with data-driven balance models, Nat. Commun. 12, 1016 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  230. H. Zou, T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, Sparse principal component analysis, J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 15, 265–286 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  231. R. Tibshirani, Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 58, 267–288 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  232. B.E. Kaiser, J.A. Saenz, M. Sonnewald, D. Livescu, Automated identification of dominant physical processes, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 116, 105496 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  233. D. Leusink, D. Alfano, P. Cinnella, Multi-fidelity optimization strategy for the industrial aerodynamic design of helicopter rotor blades, Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 42, 136–147 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  234. F. Casenave, B. Staber, X. Roynard, MMGP: a mesh morphing gaussian process-based machine learning method for regression of physical problems under nonparametrized geometrical variability, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 36, 43972–43999 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  235. J. Van Langenhove, D. Lucor, A. Belme, Robust uncertainty quantification using preconditioned least-squares polynomial approximations with l1-regularization, Int. J. Uncertainty Quantif. 6, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  236. P. Seshadri, A. Narayan, S. Mahadevan, Effectively subsampled quadratures for least squares polynomial approximations, SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quantif. 5, 1003–1023 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  237. D. Kumar, M. Raisee, C. Lacor, An efficient non-intrusive reduced basis model for high dimensional stochastic problems in CFD, Comput. Fluids 138, 67–82 (2016) [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  238. T.W. Lukaczyk, P. Constantine, F. Palacios, J.J. Alonso, Active subspaces for shape optimization, in: 10th AIAA Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Conference, 2014, p. 1171 [Google Scholar]
  239. G.D. Bird, S.E. Gorrell, J.L. Salmon, Dimensionality-reduction-based surrogate models for real-time design space exploration of a jet engine compressor blade, Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 118, 107077 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  240. E. Saetta, R. Tognaccini, G. Iaccarino, Uncertainty quantification in autoencoders predictions: Applications in aerodynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 506, 112951 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  241. G. Catalani, S. Agarwal, X. Bertrand, F. Tost, M. Bauerheim, J. Morlier, Neural fields for rapid aircraft aerodynamics simulations, Sci. Rep. 14, 25496 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  242. Z. Li, D.Z. Huang, B. Liu, A. Anandkumar, Fourier neural operator with learned deformations for PDEs on general geometries, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 24, 1–26 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  243. J. Cho, S. Nam, H. Yang, S.-B. Yun, Y. Hong, E. Park, Separable physics-informed neural networks, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 36, 23761–23788 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  244. Y.-H. Tsai, H.-T. Juan, P.-H. Chiu, C.-A. Lin, Multi-level datasets training method in physics-informed neural networks. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2504.21328 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  245. C.W. Rowley, S.T.M. Dawson, Model reduction for flow analysis and control, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 49, 387–417 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  246. S. Le Clainche, J.M. Vega, Higher order dynamic mode decomposition, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. 16, 882–925 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  247. S. Le Clainche, D. Izbassarov, M. Rosti, L. Brandt, O. Tammisola, Coherent structures in the turbulent channel flow of an elastoviscoplastic fluid, J. Fluid Mech. 888, A5 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  248. K. Fukami, T. Nakamura, K. Fukagata, Convolutional neural network based hierarchical autoencoder for nonlinear mode decomposition of fluid field data, Phys. Fluids 32 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  249. N. Lepage, S. Beneddine, C. Fiorini, I. Mortazavi, D. Sipp, N. Thome, Hybrid autoencoder/Galerkin approach for nonlinear reduced order modelling, Comput. Fluids 106811 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  250. R. Saegusa, H. Sakano, S. Hashimoto, Nonlinear principal component analysis to preserve the order of principal components, Neurocomputing 61, 57–70 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  251. C.J.G. Rojas, A. Dengel, M.D. Ribeiro, Reduced-order model for fluid flows via neural ordinary differential equations. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2102.02248 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  252. A.T. Mohan, D.V. Gaitonde, A deep learning based approach to reduced order modeling for turbulent flow control using LSTM neural networks. arXiv preprint, arXiv:1804.09269 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  253. L. Guastoni, P.A. Srinivasan, H. Azizpour, P. Schlatter, R. Vinuesa, On the use of recurrent neural networks for predictions of turbulent flows. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2002.01222 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  254. N.B. Erichson, M. Muehlebach, M.W. Mahoney, Physics-informed autoencoders for lyapunov-stable fluid flow prediction. arXiv preprint, arXiv:1905.10866 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  255. X. Yang, G. Tartakovsky, A. Tartakovsky, Physics-informed kriging: a physics-informed Gaussian process regression method for data-model convergence. arXiv preprint, arXiv:1809.03461 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  256. S. Cuomo, V. Schiano Di Cola, F. Giampaolo, G. Rozza, M. Raissi, F. Piccialli, Scientific machine learning through physics–informed neural networks: where we are and what’s next, J. Sci. Comput. 92, 88 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  257. J.J. Monaghan, Smoothed particle hydrodynamics, Rep. Prog. Phys. 68, 1703 (2005) [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  258. Z. Guo, K. Xu, Progress of discrete unified gas-kinetic scheme for multiscale flows, Adv. Aerodyn. 3, 6 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  259. C. Zhao, F. Zhang, W. Lou, X. Wang, J. Yang, A comprehensive review of advances in physics-informed neural networks and their applications in complex fluid dynamics, Phys. Fluids 36, (2024) [Google Scholar]
  260. T.-Y. Hsieh, T.-H. Huang, A multiscale stabilized physics informed neural networks with weakly imposed boundary conditions transfer learning method for modeling advection dominated flow, Eng. Comput. 40, 3353–3387 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  261. R. Molinaro, J.-S. Singh, S. Catsoulis, C. Narayanan, D. Lakehal, Embedding data analytics and CFD into the digital twin concept, Comput. Fluids 214, 104759 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  262. C. He, S. Li, Y. Liu, Data assimilation: new impetus in experimental fluid dynamics, Exp. Fluids 66, 1–24 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  263. L. Lu, P. Jin, G.E. Karniadakis, Learning nonlinear operators via DeepONet based on the universal approximation theorem of operators, Nat. Mach. Intell. 3, 218–229 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  264. Y. Wang, Z. Li, Z. Yuan, W. Peng, T. Liu, J. Wang, Prediction of turbulent channel flow using Fourier neural operator-based machine-learning strategy, Phys. Rev. Fluids 9, 084604 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  265. J. Pathak, S. Subramanian, A. Harrington, et al., FourCastNet: A global data-driven high-resolution weather model using adaptive Fourier neural operators. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2202.11214 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  266. R. Lam, K. Azizzadenesheli, A. Anandkumar et al., GraphCast: learning skillful medium-range global weather forecasting, Science 382, 1416–1421 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  267. M. Herde, B. Raonic, T. Rohner, R. Käppeli, R. Molinaro, E. de Bézenac, S. Mishra, Poseidon: efficient foundation models for PDEs, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 37, 72525–72624 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  268. M. McCabe, P. Mukhopadhyay, T. Marwah, B. Regaldo-Saint Blancard, F. Rozet, C. Diaconu, L. Meyer, K.W.K. Wong, H. Sotoudeh, A. Bietti, et al., Walrus: a cross-domain foundation model for continuum dynamics. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2511.15684 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  269. N. Ashton, J. Brandstetter, S. Mishra, Fluid intelligence: a forward look on AI foundation models in computational fluid dynamics. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2511.20455 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  270. Z. Li, H. Zheng, N. Kovachki, D. Jin, H. Chen, B. Liu, K. Azizzadenesheli, A. Anandkumar, Physics-informed neural operator for learning partial differential equations, ACM/IMS J. Data Sci. 1, 1–27 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  271. M. Lino, S. Fotiadis, A.A. Bharath, C.D. Cantwell, Multi-scale rotation-equivariant graph neural networks for unsteady Eulerian fluid dynamics, Phys. Fluids 34 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  272. H. Wu, H. Luo, H. Wang, J. Wang, M. Long, Transolver: A fast transformer solver for PDEs on general geometries. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2402.02366 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  273. H. Xiao, P. Cinnella, Quantification of model uncertainty in RANS simulations: a review, Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 108, 1–31 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  274. K. Duraisamy, G. Iaccarino, H. Xiao, Turbulence modeling in the age of data, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 51, 357–377 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  275. A. Beck, M. Kurz, A perspective on machine learning methods in turbulence modeling. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2010.12226 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  276. K. Duraisamy, Perspectives on machine learning-augmented reynolds-averaged and large eddy simulation models of turbulence, Phys. Rev. Fluids 6, 050504 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  277. J. Ling, A. Kurzawski, J. Templeton, Reynolds stress and turbulence modeling with deep neural networks, J. Fluid Mech. 807, 155–166 (2016) [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  278. E.J. Parish, K. Duraisamy, A paradigm for data-driven predictive modeling using field inversion and machine learning, J. Comput. Phys. 305, 758–774 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  279. J. Weatheritt, R. Sandberg, A novel evolutionary algorithm applied to algebraic modifications of the RANS stress–strain relationship, J. Comput. Phys. 325, 22–37 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  280. M. Schmelzer, R.P. Dwight, P. Cinnella, Discovery of algebraic Reynolds-stress models using sparse symbolic regression, Flow Turbul. Combust. 104, 579–603 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  281. Y. Fang, Y. Zhao, F. Waschkowski, A.S.H. Ooi, R.D. Sandberg, Toward more general turbulence models via multicase computational-fluid-dynamics-driven training, AIAA J. 61, 2100–2115 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  282. S. Cherroud, X. Merle, P. Cinnella, X. Gloerfelt, Space-dependent aggregation of stochastic data-driven turbulence models, J. Comput. Phys. 527, 113793 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  283. M. Oulghelou, S. Cherroud, X. Merle, P. Cinnella, Machine-learning-assisted blending of data-driven turbulence models, Flow Turbul. Combust. 1–38 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  284. M. Boxho, T. Toulorge, M. Rasquin, G. Winckelmans, G. Dergham, K. Hillewaert, Wall model based on a mixture density network to predict the wall shear stress distribution for turbulent separated flows, Flow Turbul. Combust. 1–24 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  285. A. Lozano-Durán, H.J. Bae, Machine learning building-block-flow wall model for large-eddy simulation, J. Fluid Mech. 963, A35 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  286. A. Amarloo, M.J. Rincón, M. Reclari, M. Abkar, Progressive augmentation of turbulence models for flow separation by multi-case CFD-driven surrogate optimization, Phys. Fluids 35 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  287. P. Cinnella, Data-driven turbulence modeling. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2404.09074 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  288. N. Parolini, A. Poiatti, J. Vené, M. Verani, Structure-preserving neural networks in data-driven rheological models, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 47, C182–C206 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  289. A. Kontogiannis, R. Hodgkinson, S. Reynolds, E.L. Manchester, Learning rheological parameters of non-Newtonian fluids from velocimetry data, J. Fluid Mech. 1011, R3 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  290. A. Iftakher, C.M. Aras, M.S. Monjur, M.M.F. Hasan, Data-driven approximation of thermodynamic phase equilibria, AIChE J. 68, e17624 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  291. R. Hassanian, Á. Helgadóttir, F. Gharibi, A. Beck, M. Riedel, Data-driven deep learning models in particle-laden turbulent flow, Phys. Fluids 37, 2 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  292. L. Piu, A. Péquin, R.S.M. Freitas, S. Iavarone, H. Pitsch, A. Parente, A data-driven approach to refine the partially stirred reactor closure for turbulent premixed flames, Flow Turbul. Combust. 1–26 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  293. P. Sharpe, R. Ranade, K. Tangsali, M.A. Nabian, R. Cherukuri, S. Choudhry, Accelerating transient CFD through machine learning-based flow initialization. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2503.15766 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  294. P. Sousa, C.V. Rodrigues, A. Afonso, Enhancing CFD solver with machine learning techniques, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 429, 117133 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  295. C. Scherding, G. Rigas, D. Sipp, P.J. Schmid, T. Sayadi, Data-driven framework for input/output lookup tables reduction: Application to hypersonic flows in chemical nonequilibrium, Phys. Rev. Fluids 8, 023201 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  296. P. Novello, G. Poëtte, D. Lugato, S. Peluchon, P.M. Congedo, Accelerating hypersonic reentry simulations using deep learning-based hybridization (with guarantees), J. Comput. Phys. 498, 112700 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  297. E. Bunschoten, A. Cappiello, M. Pini, Data-driven regression of thermodynamic models in entropic form using physics-informed machine learning, Comput. Fluids, 106932 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  298. V. Ojha, G. Chen, K. Fidkowski, Initial mesh generation for solution-adaptive methods using machine learning, in: AIAA SciTech 2022 Forum, 2022, pp. 1244 [Google Scholar]
  299. K.J. Fidkowski, G. Chen, Metric-based, goal-oriented mesh adaptation using machine learning, J. Comput. Phys. 426, 109957 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  300. K. Tlales, K.-E. Otmani, G. Ntoukas, G. Rubio, E. Ferrer, Machine learning mesh-adaptation for laminar and turbulent flows: Applications to high-order discontinuous Galerkin solvers, Eng. Comput. 40, 2947–2969 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  301. D. Huergo, G. Rubio, E. Ferrer, A reinforcement learning strategy for p-adaptation in high order solvers, Results Eng. 21, 101693 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  302. O. Ovadia, A. Kahana, E. Turkel, A large time step numerical method for the euler equations using deep learning, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (ICCFD11), 2022, pp. ICCFD11–2022–4202. [Google Scholar]
  303. A. Hamid, D. Rafiq, S.A. Nahvi, M.A. Bazaz, Hierarchical deep learning-based adaptive time stepping scheme for multiscale simulations, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 133, 108430 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  304. A. Zandbergen, T. van Noorden, A. Heinlein, Improving pseudo-time stepping convergence for CFD simulations with neural networks, Comput. Math. Appl. 196, 64–83 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  305. A. Kiener, S. Langer, P. Bekemeyer, Data-driven correction of coarse grid CFD simulations, Comput. Fluids 264, 105971 (2023) [Google Scholar]
  306. Y. Yin, V. Le Guen, J. Dona, E. de Bézenac, I. Ayed, N. Thome, P. Gallinari, Augmenting physical models with deep networks for complex dynamics forecasting, J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2021, 124012 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  307. K. Um, R. Brand, Y.R. Fei, P. Holl, N. Thuerey, Solver-in-the-loop: learning from differentiable physics to interact with iterative PDE-solvers, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 33, 6111–6122 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  308. K. Fukami, T. Nabae, K. Kawai, K. Fukagata, Super-resolution reconstruction of turbulent flows with machine learning, J. Fluid Mech. 909, A9 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  309. Z. Deng, C. He, Y. Liu, K.C. Kim, Super-resolution reconstruction of turbulent velocity fields using a generative adversarial network-based artificial intelligence framework, Phys. Fluids 31 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  310. Z. Wang, X. Li, L. Liu, X. Wu, P. Hao, X. Zhang, F. He, Deep-learning-based super-resolution reconstruction of high-speed imaging in fluids, Phys. Fluids 34, (2022) [Google Scholar]
  311. A. Kontogiannis, M.P. Juniper, Physics-informed compressed sensing for PC-MRI: an inverse Navier–Stokes problem, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 32, 281–294 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  312. S. Torregrosa, V. Champaney, A. Ammar, V. Herbert, F. Chinesta, Predicting high-fidelity data from coarse-mesh computational fluid dynamics corrected using hybrid twins based on optimal transport, Mech. Ind. 25, 31 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  313. C. Bermejo-Barbanoj, B. Moya, A. Badías, F. Chinesta, E. Cueto, Thermodynamics-informed super-resolution of scarce temporal dynamics data, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 430, 117210 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  314. F. Sofos, D. Drikakis, A review of deep learning for super-resolution in fluid flows, Phys. Fluids 37, (2025) [Google Scholar]
  315. Y. Yin, I. Ayed, E. de Bézenac, N. Baskiotis, P. Gallinari, LEADS: learning dynamical systems that generalize across environments, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 34, 7561–7573 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  316. L. Serrano, A. Kassa Koupa, T.X. Wang, P. Erbacher, P. Gallinari, Zebra: In-context and generative pretraining for solving parametric PDEs. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2410.03437 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  317. L. Le Gratiet, J. Garnier, Recursive co-kriging model for design of computer experiments with multiple levels of fidelity, Int. J. Uncertain. Quantif. 4 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  318. X. Meng, G.E. Karniadakis, A composite neural network that learns from multi-fidelity data: Application to function approximation and inverse PDE problems, J. Comput. Phys. 401, 109020 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  319. G. Lamberti, C. Gorlé, A multi-fidelity machine learning framework to predict wind loads on buildings, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 214, 104647 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  320. C. Matar, P. Cinnella, X. Gloerfelt, Cost-effective multi-fidelity strategy for the optimization of high-Reynolds number turbine flows guided by LES, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 110426 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  321. A. Cremades, S. Hoyas, R. Vinuesa, Additive-feature-attribution methods: a review on explainable artificial intelligence for fluid dynamics and heat transfer, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 112, 109662 (2025) [Google Scholar]
  322. H. Tang, Y. Wang, T. Wang, L. Tian, Y. Qian, Data-driven Reynolds-averaged turbulence modeling with generalizable non-linear correction and uncertainty quantification using Bayesian deep learning, Phys. Fluids 35, (2023) [Google Scholar]
  323. S. Cherroud, X. Merle, P. Cinnella, X. Gloerfelt, Sparse bayesian learning of explicit algebraic reynolds-stress models for turbulent separated flows, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 98, 109047 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  324. A. Ivagnes, N. Tonicello, P. Cinnella, G. Rozza, Enhancing non-intrusive reduced-order models with space-dependent aggregation methods, Acta Mech. 1–30 (2024) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.