Issue |
Mechanics & Industry
Volume 16, Number 6, 2015
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 609 | |
Number of page(s) | 12 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/meca/2015036 | |
Published online | 04 September 2015 |
Comparison between mixed ceramic and reinforced ceramic tools in terms of cutting force components modelling and optimization when machining hardened steel AISI 4140 (60 HRC)
1 Département de Construction Mécanique
et Productique (CMP), FGM&GP, Université des Sciences et de la Technologie Houari
Boumediene (USTHB), BP
32
El-Alia, Bab-Ezzouar,
16111
Alger,
Algérie
2 Laboratoire Mécanique Appliquée des
Nouveaux Matériaux (LMANM), Université 08 mai 1945-Guelma,
BP 401, 24000
Guelma,
Algérie
3 École Nationale Supérieure de
Technologie (ENST) – ex CT siège DG. SNVI, R. N° 5 Z.I. Rouiba,
Alger,
Algérie
4 Laboratoire Mécanique et Structures
(LMS), Université 08 mai 1945-Guelma, BP 401
Guelma, 24000, Algérie
5 LRTAPM, Université
Badji-Moukhtar, BP
12, 23000
Annaba,
Algérie
a Corresponding author:
fbrahim@yahoo.fr
Received:
23
June
2014
Accepted:
17
May
2015
This paper describes a comparison between mixed ceramic [Al2O3 (70%) + TiC (30%)] and reinforced ceramic [Al2O3 (75%) + SiC (25%)] tools in terms of cutting force components when machining in dry hard turning AISI 4140 steel, hardened to 60 HRC. The response surface methodology (RSM) and the analysis of variance (ANOVA) are applied to investigate effects of cutting speed, feed rate and depth of cut on cutting force components in order to model and optimize these technological parameters. Results of this study indicate that the machining with the mixed ceramic insert generates lower values of cutting force components than reinforced ceramic insert. Consequently, the mixed ceramic CC650 is the most powerful tool. The developed models can be used in the metal machining industries and would be helpful in selecting cutting variables for optimization of hard cutting process.
Key words: Ceramic / hard turning / AISI 4140 / cutting force / ANOVA / RSM
© AFM, EDP Sciences 2015
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.