Issue |
Mechanics & Industry
Volume 22, 2021
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 24 | |
Number of page(s) | 10 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/meca/2021022 | |
Published online | 09 April 2021 |
Regular Article
Dual-rotor misalignment fault quantitative identification based on DBN and improved D-S evidence theory
1
Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Health Maintenance for Mechanical Equipment, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, PR China
2
School Computer Science and Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, PR China
3
Lushan College of Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou 545006, PR China
* e-mail: hyydl216@163.com
Received:
30
June
2020
Accepted:
5
March
2021
Misalignment fault is the main factor that affects the normal running of dual-rotor system. Quantitative identification the misalignment fault is an important way to ensure the safe and stable service of the dual-rotor system, while the identification accuracy of traditional methods is low. Aiming at the above problems, this paper proposed a dual-rotor misalignment fault quantitative identification method based on DBN and D-S evidence theory improved by mutual information measure (MIMD-S). Seven groups experiments were conducted and several vibration signals were collected. By comparing it with the traditional methods D-S, and Pignistic improved D-S (PD-S) evidence theory, the results show that the method proposed in this paper improves the accuracy of the misalignment fault quantitative identification of the dual-rotor, the identification error rate was only 0.36%.
Key words: Deep belief network / mutual information measure / D-S evidence theory / dual-rotor system / misalignment fault quantitative identification
© Y. Dalian et al., published by EDP Sciences 2021
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.