Open Access
Issue
Mécanique & Industries
Volume 5, Number 2, Mars-Avril 2004
Virtual Concept 2002
Page(s) 199 - 205
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/meca:2004021
Published online 29 April 2004
  1. D. Clausing, Total Quality Development – A Step-by-Step Guide to World-Class Concurrent Engineering, ASME Press, 1994 [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Nahavandi, C. Preece, A Virtual Manufacturing Environment with an Element of Reality, in: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Advanced Factory Automation, UK, 1994, pp. 624–629 [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Hitchcock, A. Baker, J. Brink, The Role of Hybrid Systems Theory in Virtual Manufacturing, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference, 1994, pp. 345–350 [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Shukla, M. Vazquez, F. Chen, Virtual Manufacturing: An Overview, in: International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering 31(1), 1996, pp. 79–82 [Google Scholar]
  5. G. Mukundan, Editorial Virtual Manufacturing, in: Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems 1, 2002, pp. 1–3 [Google Scholar]
  6. N.H. Robertson, T. Perera, Feasibility for Automatic Data Collection, in: Proceedings of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference, Arlington, 2001, pp. 984–990 [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Roll, T. Altan, A.E. Tekkaya, M. Hermann, Virtuelle Umformtechnik, in: Umformtechnik 2000 PLUS, Meisenbach Bamberg, 1999, pp. 255–274 [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Klocke, Th. Beck, St. Hoppe., T. Krieg, N. Müller, T. Nöthe, H.W. Raedt, K. Sweeney, Examples of FEM application in manufacturing technology, in: Journal of Materials Processing Technology 120, 2002, pp. 450–457 [Google Scholar]
  9. S.V.G. Cobb, M.D. D'Cruz, J.R. Wilson, Integrated Manufacturing: A role for virtual reality?, in: International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 16, 1995, pp. 411–425 [Google Scholar]
  10. F. Klocke, A.M. Straube, G. Messner, T. Bergs, Virtual Process Engineering, submitted in response to Call EOI. FP6. 2002 of the European Commision, 2002 [Google Scholar]
  11. C. Caesar, H. Flegel, D. Friedrich, J. Grams, P.O. Hahn, F. Klocke, D. Lung, S. Nöken, D. Pähler, W. Schmidt, G. Trommer, K. Weinert, H. Willms, R. Zeller, Design and Optimisation of Process Chains – Today's and Tomorrow's Implementation of Alternative Production Sequences, in: AWK2002, Aachen, 2002 [Google Scholar]
  12. D. Friedrich, C. Gottschalk, H. G. Haldenwanger, F. Klocke, R. Kopp, D. Lung, D. Löhe, L. Markworth, A. Ostertag, H. W. Raedt, K. Steffens, U. Wunsch, P. Zeller, Simulation of Manufacturing Processes – Potentials and Limits of Part Design, in: AWK2002, Aachen, 2002 [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Lang, D. Rainer, U. Woessner, P. Wolf, VirCinity, Covise Module Reference Guide, 2001 [Google Scholar]
  14. vrcom GmbH, virtual design 2 User Guide, 2000 [Google Scholar]
  15. I. Nikitin, L. Nikitina, P. Frolov, G. Goebbels, M. Goebel, S. Klimenko, G.M. Nielson, Real-time simulation of elastic objects in Virtual Environments using finite element methods and precomputed Green's functions, in: Proc. of EGVE 2002, Barcelona, 2002, p. 47 [Google Scholar]
  16. K. Großmann, Zukunftspotential – Simulation, in SIM2000, Dresden, 2000, pp. 1–23 [Google Scholar]
  17. F. Schirmacher, H. Wiemer, Kopplung von Prozess- und Anlagensimulation – ein wesentlicher Schritt auf dem Weg zum, Virtuellen Umformen, in: EFB-Kolloquium, Stuttgart, 2001, pp. 11.1–11.18 [Google Scholar]
  18. K. Großmann, H. Wiemer, Anforderungen an die Simulation des Systems, Maschine-Werkzeug-Prozess in der Umformtechnik, in SIM2000, Dresden, 2000, pp. 775–793 [Google Scholar]
  19. F. Christoph, T. Collisi, R. Kohlbauer, R. Völkl, C. Effert, T. Oertli, T. Siggenauer, Durchgängiger Einsatz der Simulationstechnik, in VDI-Z, 144, No. 3, 2002 [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Dierssen, Die Virtuelle Maschine: Konfiguration, Simulation, Visualisierung, in: Simulation und Visualisierung 2000, Magdeburg, 2000 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.