EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 5 / No 2 (Mars-Avril 2004) Mécanique & Industries, 5 2 (2004) 147-159 References
Open Access
Issue
Mécanique & Industries
Volume 5, Number 2, Mars-Avril 2004
Virtual Concept 2002
Page(s) 147 - 159
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/meca:2004015
Published online 29 April 2004
  1. Bibliographie générale [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Tollenaere, Modélisation de données. Gestion des données techniques, Conception de produits mécaniques ; méthodes, modèles et outils – Hermès, Paris, 1998, p. 413–434 [Google Scholar]
  3. R.W. Bourke, Software survey: collaborative product commerce, Midrange Entreprise, November, 2000 [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Cavaillès, Méthodes de management de programme, Technea-DGA, 1991 [Google Scholar]
  5. AFNOR, Analyse de la valeur, analyse fonctionnelle, vocabulaire, NFX50-150, Afnor Edition, 1990 [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Tassinary, Pratique de l'analyse fonctionnelle, Dunod, Paris, 1997 [Google Scholar]
  7. N. Troussier, Contribution à l'intégration du calcul mécanique dans la conception de produits techniques : proposition méthodologiques pour l'utilisation et la réutilisation, Thèse de doctorat, Université Joseph Fourier-Grenoble I, 1999 [Google Scholar]
  8. X. Fischer, P. Sébastian, J.P. Nadeau, P. Joyot, La Conception Inversée Intégrée (CII), CPI'01, Fez-Maroc, 2001 [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Montare, Knowledge acquired from learning procedural cognition and its declarative cognisance, International journal of psychology, 27(121) (July, 1992) [Google Scholar]
  10. X. Fischer, P. Sébastian, J.P. Nadeau, P. Joyot, Modélisation en Conception Inversée Intégré ; une approche par contraintes, IDMME 2002, Clermont-Ferrand, France, 2002 [Google Scholar]
  11. X. Fischer, Stratégie de conduite du calcul pour l'aide à la décision en conception mécanique intégrée ; application aux appareils à pression, Thèse de doctorat, École nationale supérieure d'arts et métiers, 2000 [Google Scholar]
  12. C. Merlo, P. Girard, Knowledge modelling in engineering design control, IDMME 2000, Montreal-Québec, 2000 [Google Scholar]
  13. XXXXX Azuma, T.A. Ronald, A survey of augmented reality, Presence, teloperator and virtual environments, ACM Siggraph, Los Angeles, 1995, pp. 355–385 [Google Scholar]
  14. K.P. Akesson, Augmented virtuality: a method to automatically augment virtual worlds with video images, Chalmers University of technology-Gothemberg-Sweden, Master thesis, 1997 [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Bilinghurst, Collaborative mixed reality, International symposium on mixed reality, Yokohama-Japan, March, 1999 [Google Scholar]
  16. C. Fencott, Towards a design methodology or virtual environments, Workshop on user centred design of virtual environments, York-UK, 1999 [Google Scholar]
  17. T. Baudel, A. Braffort, Reconnaissance des gestes de la main en environnement réel, Informatiques'93, Montpellier-France, 1993, pp. 207–213 [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Braffort, Reconnaissance et compréhension de gestes, application à la langue des signes, Thèse de doctorat, Université Paris XI, 1996 [Google Scholar]
  19. K. Boehm, W. Broll, M. Sokolewicz, Dynamic gesture recognition using neural networks ; a fundament for advanced interaction construction, Conference electronic imaging science and technology, San Jose-USA, February, 1994 [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Peruch, DR. Mestre, Between desktop and head immersion: Functional Dynamic Field during vehicle control and navigation in virtual environments. Presence, 8, 1999, pp. 54–64 [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Kilchenman, Development of Sensor Packages and Software for a Three Degree-of-Freedom Haptic Interface, Master of Science Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 1999 [Google Scholar]
  22. Société Immersion, PSA Peugeot Citroën choisit Immersion SA pour équiper 60 points de vente du simulateur réalité virtuelle de la Xsara Picasso, http://www.immersion.fr/appli_picasso_milieu.html [Google Scholar]
  23. V. Lehner, T. DeFanti, Distributed Virtual Reality: Supporting Remote Collaboration in Vehicle Design, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 17([SEE TEXT]), March-April 1997, pp. 13–17 [Google Scholar]
  24. Collaborative Virtual Reality, Caterpillar Inc. Directors of Research meeting, NCSA, October 2nd 1997 [Google Scholar]
  25. P. Christiansson, Capture of User Requirements and Structuring of Collaborative VR environments, AVR II & CONVR 2001. Conference on Applied Virtual Reality in Engineering & Construction Applications of Virtual Reality. O. Tullberg, N. Dawood, M. Connell (Eds.), pp. 1–17. Gothenburg October 4–5, 2001 [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Nahvi, D.D. Nelson, J.M. Hollerbach, D.E. Johnson, Haptic Manipulation of Virtual Mechanisms from Mechanical CAD Designs, IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation (Leuven, Belgium), May 1998, pp. 375–380 [Google Scholar]
  27. J.M. Hollerbach, E. Cohen, W. Thompson, R. Freier, D.E. Johnson, A. Nahvi, D.D. Nelson, Thompson II T.V., S.C. Jacobsen, Haptic Interfacing for Virtual Prototyping of Mechanical CAD Designs, Design for Manufacturing Symposium (Sacramento, CA), September 1997 [Google Scholar]
  28. T. Pasquier, L. Todeschini, Gestuelles et apprentissage pour la detection de cibles, CAO et simulation en mécanique, P. Chedmail (Ed.), Hermès-Paris, 2002 [Google Scholar]
  29. D. Foster, W.H. Danker, The nature of stimuli. Basic principles of sensory evaluation, ASTM Special Technical Publication, No. 433, American Society for Testing Materials, pp. 7–10, 1968 [Google Scholar]
  30. J.J. Gibson, The senses considered as perceptual systems, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1966 [Google Scholar]
  31. J.J. Gibson, On the proper meaning of the term stimulus. Psychological review, Vol. 74, 1967, 533–534 [Google Scholar]
  32. G.M. Murch, Visual and auditory perception, Bobbs-Merrill Company Inc, Indaniapolis, 1973 [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Cayol, P. Bonhoure, Prospective Design Oriented towards Customer Pleasure, International Conference on Design and Emotion, Loughborough, 1–3 juillet, 2002 [Google Scholar]
  34. A. Guenand, Comment une approche sémiologique déployée en amont de la conception peut contribuer à maîtriser la qualité perçue du produit industriel ? Application aux produits domestiques dangereux, Colloque Confere, Nancy, juillet 2002 [Google Scholar]
  35. C. Fencott, Comparative contents analysis of virtual environments using Perceptual Opportunities, Conference on Digital Content Creation, Bradford, UK, 2000 [Google Scholar]
  36. J. Coutaz, L. Crowley, Interpreting human gesture with computer vision, Workshop on Gesture at the Unser Interface, CHI'95, Denver, 1995 [Google Scholar]
  37. G. Chrysslouris, D. Mavrikios, D. Fragos, V. Karabatsou, A virtual reality-based experimentation environment for the verification of human related factors in assembly processes, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 16(4), August 2000, pp. 267–276 [Google Scholar]
  38. C. Lemarchand, N. Boudaoud, Evaluation of complex systems: case study Driving-Assistance, Nordic Ergonomics Society's 34th Annual Congres, Linköping, Sweden, 1–3 Octobre, 2002 [Google Scholar]
  39. R.O. Duda, P.E. Hart, Pattern classification and scene analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1973 [Google Scholar]
  40. P. Chedmail, B. Maille, E. Ramstein, Accessibility and ergonomics study with virtual reality, state of the art, Mécanique et Industries, Vol. 3(2), 2002, pp. 147–152 [Google Scholar]
  41. S.S. Fels, Glove-TalkII, mapping hand gesture to speech using neural networks-An approach to building adaptative interfaces, Ph.D., Toronto, 1994 [Google Scholar]
  42. L. Michlet, Méthodes structurelles pour la reconnaissances de formes, Collection technique et scientifiques des télécommunications, Paris, 1994 [Google Scholar]
  43. D.J. Cohen, J.M. Ferell, N. Johnson, What very small numbers meanFormula On the psychological relation, University of North Carolina, Wilmington, 2000 [Google Scholar]
  44. S. Morin-Delerme, La clarté des objectifs des tests de produits : une condition pour augmenter leur validité et réduire l'incertitude liée au lancement des nouveaux produits. IAE Paris, GREGOR, Cahier de recherche 1996.05, 1996 [Google Scholar]
  45. X. Fischer, P. Sébastian, J.P. Nadeau, Inverted Integrated Design: constraint satisfaction for design support system, Mécaniques et Industries, Elsevier, Paris, 2000 [Google Scholar]
  46. F. Bonnay, C. Lemarchand, Evaluation of a fuzzy system-based automotive copilot dedicated to lateral guidance, Joint 9th IFSA World Congress and 20th NAFIPS International Congress and 20th NAFIPS, Vancouver, BC, July 25–28, 2001 [Google Scholar]
  47. M. Weyrick, P. Drews, An interactive environment for virtual manufacturing: the virtual workbench, computers industry, 38(1) (1999), 5–15 [Google Scholar]
  48. G. Chryss Louris, D. Maurikios, D. Fragos, V. Karabatsou, A virtual reality-based experimentation environment for the verification of human related factors in assembly processes, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 16(4) (2000), 267–276 [Google Scholar]
  49. C. Cruz Neira, Virtual Reality in Industry: successes and challenges [Google Scholar]
  50. O. Magneau, P. Bourdot, R. Gherbi, Positioning and identification of markers 3D tracking [Google Scholar]
  51. D. Mestre, Interactions entre Réalité Virtuelle et neurosciences comportementales [Google Scholar]
  52. E. Ramstein, P. Chedmail, Réalité Virtuelle et conception de produits – Évolutions récentes dans l'industrie [Google Scholar]
  53. E. Bibonne, Contraintes réelles d'une implémentation des technologies du virtuel dans les processus de conception [Google Scholar]
  54. A.M. Kunz, T. Kennel, A. Mazzone, S. Muller, Workspace to support the teamwork in the early stage of the product development process [Google Scholar]
  55. D. Paillot, F. Merienne, J.P. Frachet, M. Neveu, S. Thivent, L. Fine, Revue de projet immersive pour le style automobile [Google Scholar]
  56. D. Gutierrez, F.J. Seron, J.A. Magallon, E.J. Sobreviela, J.A. Gutierrez, CLS: a low cost vizualisation environment for the train industry [Google Scholar]
  57. T. Duval, C. Le Ternier, Interactions 3D cooperatives en environnements virtuels avec openMask pour exploitation de données techniques [Google Scholar]
  58. J.A. Gil, S. Montesinos, M. Alcaniz, J.A. Lozano, A radiosity based solution proposal for virtual scene representation in tile industry [Google Scholar]
  59. J. Posada, A. Larzabal, A. Stork, Semantic-based parametric control of CAD model conversion for large model vizualisation in Virtual Reality [Google Scholar]
  60. F. Klocke, A.M. Straube, Virtual process engineering approach to integrate Virtual Reality, FEM and simulation tools in manufacturing chain [Google Scholar]
  61. J.C. Léon, A. Michkevitch, A. Gouskov, A proposal of simulation environment operation involving flexible parts [Google Scholar]
  62. M. Collet, F. Philippe, M. Chevaldonne, D. Rigaudière, F. Merienne, F. Guillaume, N. Chevassus, Manipulation intuitive d'objets virtuels à l'aide d'une interface à deux mains [Google Scholar]
  63. G. Moreau, P. Fuchs, P. Stergiopoulos, Virtual Reality: CAD end Beyond [Google Scholar]
  64. D. Chablat, F. Bennis, B. Hoessler, M. Guibert, Haptic device and object/robot/mannequin simulation in CAD/CAM software: eM-Virtual Desktop [Google Scholar]
  65. D. Borro, A. Amundarain, A. Garcia-Alonso, J.J. Gil, L. Matey-Munoz, J. Savall, Virtual Reality for aircraft engines maintenability [Google Scholar]
  66. L. Matey-Munoz, A. Ustarroz, A. Lozano, J. Siemon, D. Klockmann, M.I. Berasategi, VIRTOOL: Virtual Reality for machine tool training [Google Scholar]
  67. J.C. Fauroux, A. Vaxelaire, DVTAM: a distributed tutorial for virtual analysis of mechanism [Google Scholar]
  68. L. Le Bodic, P. De Loor, J. Khan, F. Harrouet, Utilisation de la Réalité Virtuelle pour l'évaluation des interfaces multimodales [Google Scholar]
  69. S. Weibel, Remote control for immersive workplace [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.