EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 11 / No 6 (Novembre-Décembre 2010) Mécanique & Industries, 11 6 (2010) 439-451 References
Open Access
Issue
Mécanique & Industries
Volume 11, Number 6, Novembre-Décembre 2010
VCB (Vibrations, Chocs et Bruits)
Page(s) 439 - 451
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/meca/2010063
Published online 22 December 2010
  1. T.G. Trucano, L.P. Swiler, T. Igusa, W.L. Oberkampf, M. Pilch, Calibration, validation, and sensitivity analysis: What’s what, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 91 (2006) 1331–1357 [Google Scholar]
  2. W.L. Oberkampf, T.G. Trucano, Verification and validation benchmarks, Nucl. Eng. Des. 238 (2008) 716–743 [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Zang, C.W. Schwingshackl, D.J. Ewins, Model validation for structural dynamic analysis: An approach to the Sandia Structural Dynamic Challenge, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 197 (2008) 2645–2659 [Google Scholar]
  4. R.G. Hills, M. Pilch, K.J. Dowding, J. Red-Horse, T.L. Paez, I. Babuska, R. Tempone, Validation Challenge Workshop, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 197 (2008) 2375–2380 [Google Scholar]
  5. T.L. Paez, J. Red-Horse, Structural dynamics challenge problem: Summary, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 197 (2008) 2660–2665 [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Red-Horse, T.L Pae, Sandia National Laboratories Validation workshop: Structural dynamics application, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 197 (2008) 2578–2584 [Google Scholar]
  7. G.I. Schuëller, H.J. Pradlwarter, Benchmark study on reliability estimation in higher dimensions in structural systems – An overview, Struct. Saf. 29 (2007) 167–182 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Link, M. Friswell, Working group 1: generation of validated structural dynamic models – Results of a benchmark study utilising the GARTEUR SM-AG19 test-bed, Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 17 (2003) 9–20 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Lermitte, T. Chaudat, D. Vandeputte, T. Payen, E. Viallet, Evaluation de la fragilité d’un bâtiment de trois étages présentant des effets tridimensionnels, Actes du 7e Colloque national Agence Française du Génie Parasismique AFPS’07, Châtenay-Malabry, France, 4–6 juillet 2007 [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Lermitte, Seismic Design and Best-Estimate Methods Assesment for RC Buildings Subjected to Torsion, Proceedings of 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Smart 2008, Beijing, China, October 12–17, 2008 [Google Scholar]
  11. W. Lienau, P. Stanford, Y. Deger, Identification of bearing housing vibrations of a large barrel type injection pump and their analysis by means of the finite element method, Proceedings of 22nd International Pump Users Symposium, 2005 [Google Scholar]
  12. http://www.salome-platform.org [Google Scholar]
  13. R.J. Allemang, The Modal Assurance Criterion Twenty years of use and abuse, Sound and Vibration, 2003 [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Rebba, S. Mahedevan, Validation of models with multivariate output, Reliab. Eng. System Safe. 91 (2006) 861–871 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Rebba, S. Mahadevan, S. Huang, Validation and error estimation of computational models, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 91 (2006) 1390–1397 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. R.A. Ibrahim, C.L. Pettit, Uncertainties and dynamic problems of bolted joints and other fasteners, J. Sound Vib. 279 (2005) 857–936 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Ewins, Effective integration of analysis and test in structural dynamics, Benchmark The international magazine for engineering designers & analysts, NAFEMS, October 2009 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jeong Kim, Joo-Cheol Yoon, Beom-Soo Kang, Finite element analysis and modeling of structure with bolted joints, Appl. Math. Modell. 31 (2007) 895–911 [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Mackerle, Finite element analysis of fastening and joining: a bibliography (1990–2002), Int. J. Press. Vessels Piping 80 (2003) 253–271 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. E.J. Bergman et al., Probabilistic investigation of sensitivities of advanced test-analysis model correlation methods, J. Sound Vib. 329 (2010) 2516–2531 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. G.I. Schuëller, On the treatment of uncertainties in structural mechanics and analysis, Comput Struct. 85 (2007) 235–243 [Google Scholar]
  22. A.E. Rice, T.G. Carne, D.W. Kelton, Model validation of a complex aerospace structure, Sound and Vibration, 2008 [Google Scholar]
  23. W. D’Ambrogio, A. Fregolent, Effect of uncertainties on substructure coupling: modelling and reduction strategies, Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 23 (2009) 588–60 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Adhikari, M.I. Friswell, K. Lonkar, A. Sarkar, Experimental case studies for uncertainty quantification in structural dynamics, Prob. Eng. Mech. 24 (2009) 473–492 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Guedri, S. Ghanmi, R. Majed, N. Bouhaddi, Robust tools for prediction of variability and optimization in structural dynamics, Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 23 (2009) 1123–1133 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. J. McFarland, S. Mahadevan, Error and variability characterization in structural dynamic modeling, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 197 (2008) 2621–2631 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. S.N. Voormeeren, D. de Klerk, D.J. Rixen, Uncertainty quantification in experimental frequency based substructuring, Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 24 (2010) 106–118 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Butland, P. Avitabile, A reduced, test verified component mode synthesis approach for system modelling applications, Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 24 (2010) 904–921 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. L. Hinke, F. Dohnal, B.R. Mace, T.P. Waters, N.S. Ferguson, Component mode synthesis as a framework for uncertainty analysis, J. Sound Vib. 324 (2009) 161–178 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.