Open Access
Mechanics & Industry
Volume 20, Number 6, 2019
Article Number 629
Number of page(s) 12
Published online 02 December 2019
  1. F. Chaari, T. Fakhfakh, M. Haddar, Analytical modeling of spur gear tooth crack and influence on gear mesh stiffness, Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids 28, 461–468 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. O.D. Mohammed, M. Rantatalo, J.O. Aidanpää, Dynamic modeling of a one-stage spur gear system and vibration-based tooth crack detection analysis, Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 54, 293–305 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Shao, F. Dong, W. Wang, P. Jia, Influence of cracks on dynamic characteristics and stress intensity factor of gears, Eng. Fail. Anal. 32, 63–80 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. T. Fakhfakh, F. Chaari, M. Haddar, Numerical and experimental analysis of a gear system with teeth defects, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 25, 542–550 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. G. Nicoletto, Approximate stress intensity factors for cracked gear teeth, Eng. Fract. Mech. 44, 231–242 (1993) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. K. Inoue, G. Deng, M. Kato, Evaluation of strength of carburized spur gear teeth based on fracture mechanics-1st report. Trans. JSME, Paper No. 88-1017A (1989) [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Naresh, Raghuwanshi, A. Parey, Experimental measurement of gear mesh stiffness of cracked spur gear by strain gauge technique, Measurement 86, 266–275 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Wu, M.J. Zuo, A. Parey, Simulation of spur gear dynamics and estimation of fault growth, J. Sound Vib. 317, 608–624 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Pehan, T.K. Hellen, J. Flasker, S. Glodez, Numerical methods for determining stress intensity factors vs crack depth in gear tooth roots, Int. J. Fatigue 19, 677–685 (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Zouari, M. Maatar, T. Fakhfakh, M. Haddar, Three-dimensional analyses by finite element method of a spur gear: effect of cracks in the teeth foot on the mesh stiffness, J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 74, 75–481 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Zouari, M. Maatar, T. Fakhfakh, M. Haddar, Following Spur Gear Crack Propagation in the Tooth Foot by Finite Element Method, J Fail. Anal. Prev. 10, 531–539 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Guagliano, L. Vergani, M. Vimercati, Determination of stress intensity factors for three-dimensional subsurface cracks in hypoid gears, Eng. Fract. Mech. 73, 1947–1958 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Z. Li, H. Ma, M. Feng, B. Wen, Meshing characteristics of spur gear pair under different crack types, Eng. Fail. Anal. 80, 123–140 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Y. Yang, J. Wang, Q. Zhou, Y. Huang, J. Zhu, W. Yang, Mesh stiffness modeling considering actual tooth profile geometry for a spur gear pair, Mech. Ind. 19, 306–320 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. F. Chaari, T. Fakhfakh, M. Haddar, Simulation numérique du comportement dynamique d'une transmission par engrenages en présence de défauts de dentures, Mech. Ind. 6, 625–633 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  16. M.L. Williams, Pasadena, Calif. On the stress distribution at the base of stationary crack, J. Appl. Mech. 24, 109–114 (1957) [Google Scholar]
  17. G.L. Qian, S.N. Gu, J.S. Jiang, The dynamic behaviour and crack detection of a beam with a crack, Journal of Sound Vib. 138, 233–243 (1990) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Aloui, K. Hamrouni, T. Fakhfakh, M. Haddar, Analytical and numerical solution of the stress field and the dynamic stress Intensity factors in a cracked plate under sinusoidal loading, J Fail. Anal. Prev. 8, 551–556 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. F. Chaari, W. Baccar, M.S. Abbes, M. Haddar, Effect of spalling or tooth breakage on gearmesh stiffness and dynamic response of a one-stage spur gear transmission, Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids 27, 691–670 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.