Issue
Mechanics & Industry
Volume 21, Number 5, 2020
Scientific challenges and industrial applications in mechanical engineering
Article Number 518
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/meca/2020060
Published online 13 August 2020
  1. D. Pritima, P. Padmanabhan, Investigation of sheet bending parameters on springback in nickel coated mild steel sheets using response surface methodology, Mech. Ind. 19, 206 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. W.M. Chan, H.I. Chew, H.P. Lee, B.T. Cheok, Finite element analysis of spring-back of V-bending sheet metal forming processes, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 148, 15–24 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. H.K. Yi, D.W. Kim, C.J. Van Tyne, Y.H. Moon, Analytical prediction of springback based on residual differential strain during sheet metal bending, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. C 222, 117–129 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  4. J.R. Cho, S.J. Moon, Y.H. Moon, S.S. Kang, Finite element investigation on springback characteristics in sheet metal U-bending process, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 141, 109–116 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. J.H. Jie, D.H. Liang, A novel model to predict U-bending springback and time-dependent springback for a HSLA steel plate, Int. J. Adv. Manufactur. Technol. 81, 1055–1066 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Maati, V. Pouzols, L. Tabourot, P. Balland, E.H. Ouakdi, Numerical simulation of springback during an operation of V-bending, application to titanium and aluminum sheets, Adv. Mater. Res. 698, 69–78 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. F.J. Gardiner, The spring back of metals, Trans. ASME 1–9 (1957) [Google Scholar]
  8. S.K. Panthi, N. Ramakrishnan, A. Meraj Ahmed, S.S. Shambhavi, Finite Element Analysis of sheet metal bending process to predict the springback, Mater. Des. 31, 657–662 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  9. A.L. Castro, J.F. Durodola, N.A. Fellows, A closed form solution for predicting springback in bending of beams including hardening effect, Adv. Steel Construct. 5, 127–135 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Queener, R.J. De Angelis, Trans. ASME 757 (1968) [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Tabourot, N.A. Sène, P. Balland, N. Ksiksi, L. Charleux, M. Issack, Comparative study of modelling efficiency regarding localization development, AIP Conf. Proc. 2017 [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Maati, L. Tabourot, P. Balland, E.H. Ouakdi, M. Vautrot, N. Ksiksi, Constitutive modelling effect on the numerical prediction of springback due to a stretch-bending test applied on titanium T40 alloy, Arch. Civil Mech. Eng. 15, 836–846 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. R.R. Boyer, An overview on the use of titanium in the aerospace industry, Mater. Sci. Eng. 1–2, 103–114 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. S.B. Chikalthankar, G.D. Belurkar, V.M. Nandedkar, Factors affecting on springback in sheet metal bending, Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol. 3, 4 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  15. Z.Q. Jiang, H. Yang, M. Zhan, W.D. Xu, G.J. Li, Coupling effects of material properties and bending angle on the springback angle of titanium alloy tube during numerically controlled bending, Mater. Des. 31, 2001–2010 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  16. P. Vacher, S. Dumoulin, F. Morestin, S. Mguil-Toucha, Bidimensional strain measurement using digital images, J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 213, 811–817 (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. T. Furushima, H. Tsunezaki, T. Nakayama, K. Manabe, S. Alexsandrov, Prediction of surface roughening and necking behaviour for metal foils by inhomogeneous FE material modelling, Key Eng. Mater. 554, 169–173 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  18. L. Tabourot, P. Balland, N.A. Sène, M. Vautrot, N. Ksiksi, A. Maati, Numerical study of the impact of constitutive modelling on the evolution of necking in the case of a tensile test on C68 grade steel, Key Eng. Mater. 611–612, 521–528 (2014) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.