Issue
Mechanics & Industry
Volume 21, Number 5, 2020
Scientific challenges and industrial applications in mechanical engineering
Article Number 524
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/meca/2020058
Published online 25 August 2020
  1. S. Akin, A.R. Kovscek, Computed tomography in petroleum engineering research, in Application of X-ray computed tomography in the geosciences, Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 215, 23–38 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. F. Larachi, R. Hannaoui, P. Horgue, F. Augier, Y. Haroun, S. Youssef, E. Rosenberg, M. Prat, M. Quintard, X-ray micro-tomography and pore network modeling of single-phase fixed-bed reactors, Chem. Eng. J. 240, 290–306 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  3. T. Pak, I.B. Butler, S. Geiger, M.I.J. Van Dijke, K.S. Sabie, Droplet fragmentation: a new pore-scale process, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 1947–1952 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. D. Bernard, 3D quantification of pore scale geometrical changes using synchrotron computed microtomography, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 60, 747–762 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Chen, K.-H. Kim, F. Qin, A.T. Watson, Quantitative NMR imaging of multiphase flow in porous media, Magn. Reson. Imag. 10, 815–826 (1992) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Zhao, Y. Song, Y. Liu, H. Liang, B. Dou, Visualization and measurement of CO2 flooding in porous media using MRI, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50, 4707–4715 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  7. Y. Zhao, Y. Song, Experimental investigation on spontaneous counter-current imbibition in water-wet natural reservoir sandstone core using MRI, Magn. Reson. Chem. 55, 546–552 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Mitchell, T.C. Chandrasekera, D.J. Holland, L.F. Gladden, E.J. Fordham, Magnetic resonance imaging in laboratory petrophysical core analysis, Phys. Rep. 526, 165–225 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Li, L. Romero-Zerón, F. Marica, B.J. Balcom, Polymer flooding enhanced oil recovery evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging and relaxation time measurements, Energy Fuels 31, 4904–4914 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  10. M.L. Johns, L.F. Gladden, Magnetic resonance imaging study of the dissolution kinetics of octanol in porous media, Colloid Interface Sci. 210, 261–270 (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. G. Ersland, M.A. Fernø, A. Graue, B.A. Baldwin, J. Stevens, Complementary imaging of oil recovery mechanisms in fractured reservoirs, Chem. Eng. J. 158, 32–38 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  12. W. Salameh, S. Leclerc, D. Stemmelen, J.M. Escanye, NMR imaging of water flow in packed beds, diffusion-fundamentals.org 14, 1–5 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  13. I. Panfilova, M. Panfilov, Phenomenological meniscus model for two-phase flow through porous media, Transp. Porous Media 58, 87–119 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Zeppieri, J. Rodriguez, A.L. Lopez de Ramos, Interfacial tension of alkane + water systems, Chem. Eng. J. 46, 1086–1088 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Fannir, S. Leclerc, I. Panfilova, D. Stemmelen, Two-Phase displacement in porous media studied by MRI techniques, in 16th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, 2018, pp. 1–13 [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Yan, X. Luo, W. Wang, F. Chen, R. Toussaint, J. Schmittbuhl, G. Vasseur, L. Zhang, Testing oil saturation distribution in migration paths using MRI, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 86–87, 237–245 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. G. Løvoll, Y. Meheust, K. Jørgen Maløy, E. Aker, J. Schmittbuhl, Competition of gravity, capillary and viscous forces during drainage in a two-dimensional porous medium, a pore scale study, Energy 30, 861–872 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. M.J. Blunt, Multiphase Flow in Permeable Media, Cambridge University Press, 2017 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. C. Marle, Cours de production, Les écoulements polyphasiques en milieu poreux, tome 4, Technip, 1972 [Google Scholar]
  20. R. Lenormand, E. Touboul, C. Zarcone, Numerical models and experiments on immiscible displacements in porous media, J. Fluid Mech. 189, 165–187 (1988) [Google Scholar]
  21. R. Lenormand, Liquids in porous media, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2, 79–88 (1990) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.