Open Access
Mécanique & Industries
Volume 12, Number 6, 2011
Page(s) 503 - 512
Published online 06 January 2012
  1. ISO 8015, ISO 1101, ISO 5458, ISO 5459, ISO 1660, ISO 2768, ISO 10578, ISO 10579, Tolérances géométriques, International Standard Organisation [Google Scholar]
  2. ASME Y14.5-2009, Geometric and Dimensioning Tolerancing, ASME Press, 2009 [Google Scholar]
  3. ISO 21747, Statistical methods, Process performance and capability statistics for measured quality characteristics, International Standard Organisation, 2006, p. 42 [Google Scholar]
  4. A.M. Polansky, A smooth nonparametric approach to multivariate process capability, Technometrics 43 (2001) 199–211 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M.K. Nejad, F. Vignat, F. Villeneuve, 3D Simulation of Manufacturing Defects for Tolerance Analysis, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 45 (2009) 631–648 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Desrochers, W. Ghie, L. Laperriere, Statistical tolerance analysis using the unified Jacobian-Torsor model, Int. J. Prod. Res. 48 (2010) 4609–4630 [Google Scholar]
  7. D.M. Hawkins, Multivariate quality control based on regression adjusted variables, Technometrics 33 (1991) 61–75 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A.M. Polansky, A general framework for constructing control charts, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 21 (2005) 633–653 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. H. Chen, A multivariate process capability index over a rectangular solid zone, Stat. Sinica 4 (1994) 749–758 [Google Scholar]
  10. E.J. Foster, R.R. Barton, N. Gautam, L.T. Truss, J.D. Tew, The process-oriented multivariate capability index, Int. J. Prod. Res. 43 (2005) 2135–2148 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. W. Taam, P. Subbaiah, J.W. Liddy, A note on multivariate capability indices, J. Appl. Stat. 20 (1993) 339–351 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. F.K. Wang, N.F. Hubele, F.P. Lawrence, J.D. Miskulin, H. Shahriari, Comparison of three multivariate process capability indices, J. Quality Technol. 32 (2000) 263–275 [Google Scholar]
  13. K. Mannar, D. Ceglarek, Functional capability space and optimum process adjustments for manufacturing processes with in-specs failure, IIE Transactions 42 (2010) 95–106 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. P.F. Jackson, Simple Process Capability? J. Quality Eng. 40 (2001) 34–38 [Google Scholar]
  15. F.K. Wang, N.F. Hubele, Quality evaluation of geometric tolerance regions in form and location, J. Quality Eng. 14 (2002) 205–211 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. G. Knowles, G. March, J. Anthony, Evaluation process capability for geometrically toleranced parts: A practical approach, J. Quality Eng. 14 (2002) 365–374 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. H.C. Zhang, Advanced Tolerancing Techniques, Wiley Interscience, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1997 [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Dowling, P. Griffin, K. Tsui, C. Zhou, Statistical issues in geometric feature inspection using coordinate measuring machines, Technometrics 39 (1997) 3–17 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. D.R. Bothe, Assessing capability for hole location, J. Quality Eng. 18 (2006) 325–331 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Xi, E.A. Lehtihet, T.M. Cavalier, Numerical approximation approach to the producibility of composite position tolerance specifications for pattern of holes, Int. J. Prod. Res. 42 (2004) 243–266 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. M.D. Phillips, B. Cho, Quality improvements for process with circular and spherical specification regions, J. Quality Eng. 11 (1999) 235–243 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Shan, R.N. Roth, R.J. Wilson, A new approach to statistical geometrical tolerance analysis, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 15 (1999) 222–230 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Papoulis, Probability, random variables, and stochastic process, 3rd Edition, McGraw Hill, 1991 [Google Scholar]
  24. N.D. Cox, S.S. Shapiro, Statistical Model in Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1967 [Google Scholar]
  25. M.J. Harry, Six Sigma Mechanical Design Tolerancing, Publication No. 6s-2-10/88, Motorola Inc., 1988, p. 242 [Google Scholar]
  26. ASME B5.54, Methods for Performance Evaluation of Computer Numerically Controlled Machining Centers, ASME Press, 1992 [Google Scholar]
  27. S. Tichadou, et al., 3-D manufacturing dispersions: two experimental applications, 10th CIRP International Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing, Erlangen, Germany, 2007 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.