Open Access
Mechanics & Industry
Volume 16, Number 2, 2015
Article Number 202
Number of page(s) 10
Published online 22 January 2015
  1. D. Dowson, History of tribology. 2nd edn., John Wiley, 1998 [Google Scholar]
  2. V.L. Popov, Contact mechanics and friction, physical principles and application, Springer Verlag, 2010 [Google Scholar]
  3. Y. Song et al., Simulation of dynamics of beam structures with bolted joints using adjusted Iwan beam elements, J. Sound. Vib. 273 (2004) 249–276 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. H.A. Sherif, Effect of contact stiffness on the establishment of self-excited vibrations, Wear 141 (1991) 227–234 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Flores, J. Ambrosio, J.C.P. Claro, H.M. Lankarani, Influence of the contact-impact model on the dynamic response of multi-body systems, ImechE 2006, Vol. 220, Part K, pp. 21–34. [Google Scholar]
  6. K. Anandavel, R.V. Prakash, Extension of Ruiz criterion for evaluation of 3-D fretting fatigue damage parameter, Procedia Engineering 55 (2013) 655–660 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. J.-L. Ligier, N. Antoni, Cumulative microslip in conrod big end bearing system, ASME 8-10 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  8. N. Antoni, Q.-S. Nguyen, J.-L. Ligier, P. Saffré, J. Pastor, On the cumulative microslip phenomenon, Eur. J. Mech. – A/Solids 26 (2007) 626–646 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  9. D.D. Quinn, A new regularization of Coulomb friction, J. Vib. Acoust. 126 (2004) 391–397 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Berthoud, T. Baumberger, Shear stiffness of a solid–solid multicontact interface, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 454 (1998) 1615–1634 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Bureau, T. Baumberger, C. Caroli, O. Ronsin, Low velocity friction between macroscopic solids. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, t.2, Serie IV, 2001, pp. 699–707 [Google Scholar]
  12. W.D. Iwan, A distributed element model for hysteresis and its steady–state dynamic response, ASME J. Appl. Mech. 33 (1966) 893–900 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Liang, S. Fillmore, O. Ma, An extended bristle friction force model with experimental validation, Mech. Mach. Theory 56 (2012) 91–100 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J.J. O’Connor, K.L. Johnson, The role of surface asperities in transmitting tangential forces between metals, Wear 6 (1963) 118–139 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. J.A. Greenwood, J.B.P. Williamson, Contact of nominally flat surfaces, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 295 (1966) 300 [Google Scholar]
  16. H.A. Sherif, S.S. Kossa, Relationship between normal and tangential contact stiffness of nominally flat surfaces, Wear 151 (1991) 49–62 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Gonzalez-Valadez, A. Baltazar, R.S. Dwyer-Joyce, Study of interfacial stiffness ratio of a rough surface in contact using a spring model, Wear 268 (2010) 373–379 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Gonzalez-Valadez, R.S. Dwyer-Joyce, On the interface stiffness in rough contacts using ultrasonic waves, Ingenieria Mecanica 3 (2008) 29–36 [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Medina, D. Nowell, D. Dini, Analytical and numerical models for tangential stiffness of rough elastic contacts, Tribol. Lett. 49 (2013) 103–115 [Google Scholar]
  20. F. Robbe-Valloire, Statistical analysis of asperities on a rough surface, Wear 249 (2001) 401–408 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Timoshenko, Résistance des matériaux, Dunod, 1990 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.