Open Access
Issue
Mechanics & Industry
Volume 22, 2021
Article Number 7
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/meca/2020101
Published online 08 March 2021
  1. M. Martinjak, Numerical simulation of Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) system, Bologna: Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, Zagreb University (2016) [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Capetillo, F. Ibarra, Multiphase injector modeling for automotive SCR systems: a full factorial design of experiment and optimization, Comput. Math. Appl. 74 , 188–200 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  3. G. Zheng, M.K. Sampath, W. Alcini et al. Design improvements of urea SCR mixing for medium-duty trucks, SAE Paper. Detroit, Michigan, USA, 2013, 2013-01-1074 [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Zhang, C. Sun, M. Wu et al. Optimization design of SCR mixer for improving deposit performance at low temperatures, Fuel 237 , 465–474 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  5. Y. Zhang, D. Lou, P. Tan, Z. Hu, Experimental study on the particulate matter and nitrogenous compounds from diesel engine retrofitted with DOC + CDPF + SCR, Atmos. Environ. 177 , 45–53 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Choi, Y. Sung, G.M. Choi, D.J. Kim, Numerical analysis of NOx reduction for compact design in marine urea-SCR system, Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng. 7 , 1020–1033 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  7. Z. Wen-juan, S. Shi-jin, D. Hong-yi, W. Zhi, W. Jian-xin, 3d modeling of flow, spray of reductant and surface chemical reaction in diesel urea scr-nox catalytic converter, Trans. CSICE 25 , 433–438 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  8. G. Zheng, G. Palmer, G. Salanta, A. Kotrba, Mixer Development for Urea SCR Applications; No. 2009-01-2879; SAE Technical Paper: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2009 [Google Scholar]
  9. G. Zheng, A. Fila, A. Kotrba, R.A. Floyd, Investigation of urea deposits in urea SCR systems for medium and heavy duty trucks; SAE Technical Paper: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2010 [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Park, Y. Sung, T. Kim, I. Lee, G. Choi, D. Kim, Effect of static mixer geometry on flow mixing and pressure drop in marine SCR applications, Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng. 6 , 27–38 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  11. S.G.M. Hasan, W.M.K. Aditya, L.O. Taeck, Investigation of urea-water solution spray impingement on the hot surface of automotive SCR system, J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 32 , 2935–2946 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  12. G. Mehdi, S. Zhou, Y. Zhu et al., Numerical investigation of SCR mixer design optimization for improved performance, Processes 7 , 168 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Schmid, I. Zarikos, A. Terzis, N. Roth, B. Weigand, Crystallization of urea from an evaporative aqueous solution sessile droplet at sub-boiling temperatures and surfaces with different wettability, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 91 , 80–88 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  14. L. Tan, P. Feng, S. Yang, Y. Guo, S. Liu, Z. Li, CFD studies on effects of SCR mixers on the performance of urea conversion and mixing of the reducing agent, Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 123 , 82–88 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  15. X. Tian, Y. Xiao, W. Zhang, Numerical simulation of urea aqueous solution injection process in a selective catalytic reduction system, Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (iCBBE), 2010 4th International Conference on. IEEE, 2010 [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Börnhorst, O. Deutschmann, Single droplet impingement of urea water solution on a heated substrate, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 69 , 55–61 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Börnhorst, J. Amsler et al., Thermodynamics and reaction mechanism of urea decomposition, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 16785–16797 (2019) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. T.J. Wang, S.W. Baek, S.Y. Lee, D.H. Kang, G.K. Yeo, Experimental investigation on evaporation of urea‐water‐solution droplet for SCR applications, AIChE J. 55 , 3267–3276 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  19. F. Birkhold, U. Meingast, P. Wassermann, O. Deutschmann, Modeling and simulation of the injection of urea-water-solution for automotive SCR DeNOx-systems, Appl. Catal. B Environ. 70 , 119–127 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  20. D. Kuhnke, Spray/wall interaction modelling by dimensionless data analysis, Shaker: Düren, Germany, 2004 [Google Scholar]
  21. H. Ström, A. Lundström, B. Andersson, Choice of urea-spray models in CFD simulations of urea-SCR systems, Chem. Eng. J. 150 , 69–82 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  22. Y. Liao, P.D. Eggenschwiler, R. Furrer, M. Wang, K. Boulouchos, Heat transfer characteristics of urea-water spray impingement on hot surfaces, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 117 , 447–457 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Oh, K. Lee, Spray Characteristics of a urea solution injector and optimal mixer location to improve droplet uniformity and NOx conversion efficiency for selective catalytic reduction, Fuel 119 , 90–97 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  24. K.W. Ku, J.G. Hong, C.W. Park et al., Effects of various factors on the conversion efficiency of urea solution in a urea selective catalytic reduction system, Energy Fuels 28 , 5959–5967 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  25. T.L. Mckinley, A.G. Alleyne, C.F. Lee, Mixture non-uniformity in SCR systems: Modeling and uniformity index requirements for steady-state and transient opera-tion, SAE Paper. Detroit, Michigan, USA, 2010, 2010-01-0883 [Google Scholar]
  26. C. Zhao, D. Lou, Y. Zhang et al., Application study on a new hybrid canning structure of after-treatment system for diesel engine, MDPI 13 , 734 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  27. T.O. Lockyer, B.A. Reid, G.K. Hargrave, P. Gaynor, J. Wilson, Optical investigation on the ability of a cordierite substrate mixing device to combat deposits in SCR dosing systems, SAE Technical Paper: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  28. A.M. Bernhard, D. Peitz, M. Elsener et al., Hydrolysis and thermolysis of urea and its decomposition byproducts biuret, cyanuric acid and melamine over anatase TiO2, Appl. Catal. B Environ. 115–116 , 129–137 (2012) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.